Grand jury: UL stripper scandal
- Thread starter Delk#00
- Start date
These things go to grand juries and there's almost always a wild card of new info or evidence that comes out. And in some instances, others are implicated.
I've got a strange feeling, there's a big twist that's about to come out.
I've got a strange feeling, there's a big twist that's about to come out.
But it is too late for that. I would agree that it would look suspicious if this would have happened at the outset, but the ship has largely sailed. There was already a post-season ban and the final ruling on the NCAA case will come down soon, long before any potential prosecutions proceed criminally. If anything, this is harmful to UofL because to the extent the NCAA folks handing out the punishment were on the fence, they will certainly feel pressure to drop the hammer with news that this has turned criminal due to sex with minors.
The grand jury indictment is saying there's enough evidence that it did in fact happen. This doesn't help UL cause. It hurts it and puts them at more risk.
Age of consent means nothing when you cross state lines to do it. The federal age consent is 18 across the board.
Per funkyrhino on the scout board there's nothing to worry about.
wdrb.com/story/35516419/jefferson-county-grand-jury-hearing-evidence-today-in-katina-powell-sex-scandal
"It has nothing to do with our case though."
wdrb.com/story/35516419/jefferson-county-grand-jury-hearing-evidence-today-in-katina-powell-sex-scandal
"It has nothing to do with our case though."
Well that was a quick turnaround. Sounds like a dog and pony show designed to clear UL's name at the 11th hour. Probably concocted by Jurich and his buddies in the legal system. Brings to mind the shooting incident that got swept under the rug. Boss Hogg has nothing on the turtleneck.
What a joke. The book claims Blakeney hit it again the next day and can't identify her? He would have been 17 at the time, and likely the girl too.
Certainly the recruits could not confirm payments were made. Duh. That is a question for either Powell...already said so a million times....and McGee...and he is not forced to testify against himself. That is a meaningless statement from Jason Riley and only says there was not enough evidence to indict....not that there was no evidence or that it isn't true.
Similar threads
