I'd go with the 76ers having the better supporting cast. Had Mutombo, still highly productive even at 34 and is a hall of famer.2015 Cavs w/o Lebron >>> 2001 Sixers w/o Iverson.
I'd go with the 76ers having the better supporting cast. Had Mutombo, still highly productive even at 34 and is a hall of famer.2015 Cavs w/o Lebron >>> 2001 Sixers w/o Iverson.
Yes I watched it. The supporting cast of GSW is better than the supporting cast that Kobe/Shaq had.
Are you kidding? Eric Snow, Aaron Mckie, Tyrone Hill, Raja Bell and Mutombo are better than any of the other starters the Cavs had last night...maybe other than Mosgov(sp?).2015 Cavs w/o Lebron >>> 2001 Sixers w/o Iverson.
Yes he hit the block, but not enough. I know I saw more fadeaway's than post ups out of the best player in the world. You can scream Iggy all you want but come man even with him being a good defender Lebron should be able to handle that.
Not to go all Jordan>Lebron but the best usually do their best vs the best and then guard them too! Not Lebron!
Just frustrating when he is very damn capable!
Didn't mean to hurt your feelings. I was complimenting Lebron.I guess to admit you are an idiot, but that's probably asking too much because you don't seem to be aware of it.
Yes I watched it. The supporting cast of GSW is better than the supporting cast that Kobe/Shaq had.
Don't flatter yourself, and no you weren't.Didn't mean to hurt your feelings. I was complimenting Lebron.
He's also using two players that have each other versus Lebron by himself, the fact that Kobe had Shaq and Shaq had Kobe makes that argument moot.Deeper. 2001 Kobe/Shaq though were arguably the best 1-2 punch in the history of the game.
If GS had tried to play small ball, Shaq would have put up 40/20 per night.
The Lakers best playoff run was absolutely 2001. Everyone was healthy and everything was clicking. They missed running the table by one game.
I said best team was the 2000 Lakers, not best playoff run. Obviously that is 2001. In fact, 2002, 2009 and 2010 all lost less playoff games than 2000 (albeit 7, and 7 for 09, 10 vs. 8 for 2000). I just meant purely the best team I'd rate the Lakers in 2000, with 82 wins overall.
I said best team was the 2000 Lakers, not best playoff run. Obviously that is 2001. In fact, 2002, 2009 and 2010 all lost less playoff games than 2000 (albeit 7, and 7 for 09, 10 vs. 8 for 2000). I just meant purely the best team I'd rate the Lakers in 2000, with 82 wins overall.
Yep, agreed....It always bugged me in the "Player vs Player" debate that people RARELY brought up coaching. Now, true to form, NBA is probably last in all sports for influence of coaching. Jordan was going to win games regardless. But how many more titles do Lebron/Manning get with HOF coaching? How many less titles do Jordan/Brady get without Jackson/Belichick? Even worse, how does Jordan fair with Blatt and Spoelstra at the helm. Coaching is worth way more than people think, and it has nothing to with Lebron or Jordan.. that coach is responsible for all players. A HOF coach will make the entire squad better.
I'll take your word for it, as I can't very well recall that Philly team. But if true - man, they must've been terrible. In the Finals when LJ was on the bench, Cleveland scored 54 points per 100 possessions. The league low for the year was 93. Just awful....2015 Cavs w/o Lebron >>> 2001 Sixers w/o Iverson.
Easy Lebron = King of the Court ....right NOW.What does this finals performance mean for Lebron's overall legacy? Lebron did everything he could do to give this team a chance to win but it wasn't close to enough. Could Kobe win two games in the finals with the same roster? Could Michael? We can never really know. Lebron may not be the best ever but he is certainly the most unique player I've ever seen. I personally see this performance as a push for him. Next year will be key.