ADVERTISEMENT

Global Climate Changes

One needs an Ivy League resume to understand that there’s nothing we can do to cut carbon emissions without China and India? Or to understand that a grand focus on climate did nothing to prepare LA for this event and likely made it worse?
Annual_CO2_emissions_by_region%2C_2022.png


Anything we could've done but didn't to cut carbon emissions would've been just a drop in the bucket. So, if you grant them their "argumetn" that climate change was the cause of the devastaing fires, then there's literally nothing we could've done to prevent it. It's a ruse, a politically expedient lie, and nothing more. I'ts a deflection from ALL the things they could've done TO PREVENT IT.

A very profitable (for some) ruse.
 
Annual_CO2_emissions_by_region%2C_2022.png


Anything we could've done but didn't to cut carbon emissions would've been just a drop in the bucket. So, if you grant them their "argumetn" that climate change was the cause of the devastaing fires, then there's literally nothing we could've done to prevent it. It's a ruse, a politically expedient lie, and nothing more. I'ts a deflection from ALL the things they could've done TO PREVENT IT.

A very profitable (for some) ruse.

What is the actual number in terms of overall carbon in the atmosphere that this chart represents? You can give it in decimals or percentage, I don't care. Just support it with actual data as opposed to a graph that doesn't tell you jack shit in the grand scheme of things.
 
His graph shows that if we cut our emissions in half that it wouldn't mean shit. It wouldn't matter if we went to zero.

China and Asia emissions are growing with massive gains year over year. Their increase in the last 20 years equals our current total output. They aren't slowing down much less reducing. China will throw these ****ers that care a bone with solar and wind production. They will state, "Without China's commitment to renewables, it would be even higher!!!"

The people that buy the green energy arguments bought Obama's JobsSavedOrCreated or Biden's ReturningPandemicWorkersEqualJobGains.
 
I want anyone that’s worried about global climate change to get off of the grid. Ride your bike or pony everywhere. Stop using your computers and get rid of your cell phones
 
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12
What is the actual number in terms of overall carbon in the atmosphere that this chart represents? You can give it in decimals or percentage, I don't care. Just support it with actual data as opposed to a graph that doesn't tell you jack shit in the grand scheme of things.

That graph tells you a lot. It is data. Total carbon data are not relevant to the point I made. What point is it that you think I'm making?
 
Since most of our climate activist friends like to talk about

History of Wildfires in western US
  • Before 1800: The area burned annually was large due to the more forested landscape.

  • 1400–1700 CE: Burning levels were low due to a decrease in droughts and temperatures.

  • 950–1250 CE: Burning levels peaked due to the Medieval Climate Anomaly.

  • 1800s: Burning levels peaked again due to human activities.

  • 20th century: Burning levels were low due to changing fire outbreak management practices.

That graph tells you a lot. It is data. Total carbon data are not relevant to the point I made. What point is it that you think I'm making?
Your graph represents a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of increase. And if you deduct out what is human made vs natural it's even smaller. I would challenge you to do the math on total CO2, human made CO2, required human made CO2 (what we cannot get rid of no matter what), and then also start to factor in the circulation of CO2 to O2 from greenspace and it becomes extremely challenging to believe that CO2 is impacting anything except the power struggle to control oil supplies.

Try to google what i asked you to google above and let me know if you find it easily. You won't because they don't want you to. You have to dig to get to the numbers and put them together. You can choose to at least challenge status quo for yourself or just continue to trust everything the media says, which has proven time and again to be more propaganda than fact these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sefus12
Thankfully we finally got above the average high this month. Been frigid. About 7 degrees above normal average. Record temp for today in Louisville was a blazing 69 degrees in 1951. Record low = -13 in 1976. Yikes!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
Thankfully we finally got above the average high this month. Been frigid. About 7 degrees above normal average. Record temp for today in Louisville was a blazing 69 degrees in 1951. Record low = -13 in 1976. Yikes!!
Saturday morning CBS news warns of “Life Threatening” low temps to hit us in the coming week.
 
John Coleman has been dead seven years. Calling him the CEO of the weather channel is true. This was in 1981 before being fired shortly after.

You dopes will grasp at any warm body willing to recite your Fox beliefs.

Well, should we rely upon Al Gore, TV kids show host, actors?

My carbon footprint can be exponentially increased and I would never equal Al Gore, Taylor Swift, John Kerry, etc. So, I rely upon them to decide if there is an existential threat. They say “no.”

Those dopes.
 
Well, should we rely upon Al Gore, TV kids show host, actors?

My carbon footprint can be exponentially increased and I would never equal Al Gore, Taylor Swift, John Kerry, etc. So, I rely upon them to decide if there is an existential threat. They say “no.”

Those dopes.
Those are more of your made up bullchit.

professional Scientists- the people that have given their life to analyzing and studying the climate. Of course, this will not work for you because you do not like what they to say. It goes against your Fox News.
 
Those are more of your made up bullchit.

professional Scientists- the people that have given their life to analyzing and studying.

Dude. You are unraveled with your name calling and your “bullchit.” Take a break and a deep breath. You aren’t impressing or influencing anyone with your panic posts.
 
John Coleman has been dead seven years. Calling him the CEO of the weather channel is true. This was in 1981 before being fired shortly after.

You dopes will grasp at any warm body willing to recite your Fox beliefs.
Does it matter when he died? I bet you’re a real tough guy too. Dopes. I would love to meet you to see how big and tough you are in real person. And given the fact that is been proven time and again that media is biased and outright lie about anything, including the climate agenda, but you still just keep believing. ALL scientists agreed that the vaccine was harmless until X gets taken over and now you start to hear the truth. But keep believing buddy, and take your boosters too. We need to weed out more like you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GJNorman
Does it matter when he died? I bet you’re a real tough guy too. Dopes. I would love to meet you to see how big and tough you are in real person. And given the fact that is been proven time and again that media is biased and outright lie about anything, including the climate agenda, but you still just keep believing. ALL scientists agreed that the vaccine was harmless until X gets taken over and now you start to hear the truth. But keep believing buddy, and take your boosters too. We need to weed out more like you.
Does it matter if he died in 18? Yes.

So you’re comparing a vaccine that was put together in months to 170 years of data collected by climate scientists.

I’m glad to meet you anytime. Private message me and we can figure it out.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT