Couple that with California regulation getting stymied.
One needs an Ivy League resume to understand that there’s nothing we can do to cut carbon emissions without China and India? Or to understand that a grand focus on climate did nothing to prepare LA for this event and likely made it worse?
Anything we could've done but didn't to cut carbon emissions would've been just a drop in the bucket. So, if you grant them their "argumetn" that climate change was the cause of the devastaing fires, then there's literally nothing we could've done to prevent it. It's a ruse, a politically expedient lie, and nothing more. I'ts a deflection from ALL the things they could've done TO PREVENT IT.
A very profitable (for some) ruse.
What is the actual number in terms of overall carbon in the atmosphere that this chart represents? You can give it in decimals or percentage, I don't care. Just support it with actual data as opposed to a graph that doesn't tell you jack shit in the grand scheme of things.
Your graph represents a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of increase. And if you deduct out what is human made vs natural it's even smaller. I would challenge you to do the math on total CO2, human made CO2, required human made CO2 (what we cannot get rid of no matter what), and then also start to factor in the circulation of CO2 to O2 from greenspace and it becomes extremely challenging to believe that CO2 is impacting anything except the power struggle to control oil supplies.That graph tells you a lot. It is data. Total carbon data are not relevant to the point I made. What point is it that you think I'm making?