Amount of CO2 in the atmosphere currently (400ppm) | 0.0004 | |
Human caused CO2 (3.2%) | 0.032 | |
Total | 0.0000128 | |
US Caused CO2 (21%) | 0.21 | 0.000002688 |
Causes and Impact of US Caused CO2
Breakout of US Caused CO2 by Source | % of US CO2 | Resulting % of total Human Caused CO2 | Total Global CO2 by Source | Total Global CO2 by Source as % |
Transportation (28%) | 0.28 | 0.0588 | 0.0000001580544 | 0.000016% |
Electric Power (25%) | 0.25 | 0.0525 | 0.0000001411200 | 0.000014% |
Industry (23%) | 0.23 | 0.0483 | 0.0000001298304 | 0.000013% |
Agriculture (10%) | 0.1 | 0.021 | 0.0000000564480 | 0.000006% |
Commercial & Residential (13%) | 0.13 | 0.0273 | 0.0000000733824 | 0.000007% |
So if every single car, bus, boat, plane, train, etc in the US was 100% carbon neutral they would improve the overall atmosphere by 0.0000001580544 parts per hundred or .000016%.
So please, explain to me how the hell it makes sense to spend trillions and trillions of dollars on something that will likely never any significant impact on CO2 levels globally. Even if every single source of CO2 in every single country were completely turned to CO2 neutral it would have a .0013% impact on overall CO2 in the atmosphere. This is 100% by the numbers so feel free to shoot holes in the numbers all you want. You can get a 10th of a percentage point here and there but ultimately this is the mathematic view of the issue and tends to put it into perspective for me.