We put 40 up on them last year at their place. No way they duplicate what they did. I thinking UK 45 UofLsucksville 24
And Louisville put up 44 and Kentucky had Dupree and Smith while UofL playing their 3rd String QB
We put 40 up on them last year at their place. No way they duplicate what they did. I thinking UK 45 UofLsucksville 24
You have more than just an unproven Oline. You have an unproven WR corps, unproven QB that couldn't keep his job last year, and an unproven secondary. You lost nearly all of your depth across the board with over half of your two deep on offense and defense graduating or leaving early for the NFL. You also never beat us with Kragthorpe so how well did you actually play? I wouldn't bank on playing well in CWS going forward Stoops will start packing the place again. Past performance has zero bearing on future performance in an away game at a certain stadium. That'd be like me saying it doesn't matter that we go to UGA this year we usually play well there. That doesn't mean it won't be a really tough place to play or guarantee any level of success there
And Louisville put up 44 and Kentucky had Dupree and Smith while UofL playing their 3rd String QB
And Louisville put up 44 and Kentucky had Dupree and Smith while UofL playing their 3rd String QB
Again, this 3rd string QB comment is always used by UL fans...but it isn't true. Gardner was unavailable, but when he was playing, he wasn't always QB1...Bonnafon at times was...then for the bowl game, Bonnafon was available, but Bolin was QB1...truth is UL was a merry-go-round at QB and there wasn't a difference between 1-2-3 from week to week.
UK loses Dupree and Smith and will have to make up for it...they also cant believe that they will get the defensive scores as they did last year. UL loses the secondary, OL and a few other defensive pieces to go along with missing Parker...they obviously shouldn't believe that the production from Parker will be replaced by a similar output either.
Yeah, this is often conveniently overlooked by UofL fans. They like to chirp about how their third string QB lit us up, but if your third string QB is better (much better?) than your second string QB, isn't that a reflection on your all-knowing offensive genius coach?The way it was looking we might have run away with it had your 2nd string QB not got hurt..
UK will not come up short this season.Or the 3rd Team QB would not have handed Kentucky 14 Points...point being both sides can go around in a circle on this.
Fact is Kentucky gave its best shot and came up short
UK will not come up short this season.
PE we beat your Cards this year...mark it down
I am going to warn you. Don't bring up Steelers name. You don't know him personally so you aren't allowed to talk about him. I got chastised on Friday for bringing up his name. I just wanted help in clarifying some info and I got hammered. Just a little friendly advice. Keep his name out of your mouth or he'll be after you.Steelers isn't in the same league as Zipp...
I think that Steelers is probably a good guy and I don't think he's ever been a problem on this board.
Zipp needs to be institutionalized.
That was Jared Steelman who used to be on 680. But honestly, if you listened to him it actually made a lot of sense and quite honestly I think Brady would have had UofL's crop of receivers. A lot of the callers agreed. Like I said, if you could go back and hear it, it made a lot of sense.Remember 2 years ago the big summer story was "would Tom Brady rather have ul's receivers than his own"?
If that's true, why does Tom hate the Underdogs and WKRD so much? I can answer. It's because they cover UK too much and also are far to critical of UofL. Vanetti trashes UofL far too much for me. Won't listen anymore.You are listening to the Underdogs on station WKRD. The Underdogs are unapologetically biased towards UL.
Don't care for Deener. Self proclaimed UK fan is far to heavy lean towards the Cats. Billy Reed on the other hand is a legend in this area and has a wealth of knowledge. He is very good and basically speaks common sense. I feel like he is the one guy around here who will tell it like it is. Count me as a big fan of Billy Reed. I wish he was on Deener's show more often. Heck, I wish he had Denner's show instead of Deener.Diener is way worse than them...especially when Reed is on there
Don't care for Deener. Self proclaimed UK fan is far to heavy lean towards the Cats. Billy Reed on the other hand is a legend in this area and has a wealth of knowledge. He is very good and basically speaks common sense. I feel like he is the one guy around here who will tell it like it is. Count me as a big fan of Billy Reed. I wish he was on Deener's show more often. Heck, I wish he had Denner's show instead of Deener.
The area that Louisville DID NOT Lose Depth was the Defensive Front Seven...11 out of the 14 in the 2 Deep is Returning and one of the Replacement on the Front Seven is the Big XII 2012 Post Season and 2014 Preseason Defensive Player of the Year
Um, okay. What exactly is the posing part? Didn't Deener name one of his kids after Cawood Ledford? So you are telling me he is not a UK fan?This says everything that anyone needs to know about you. Mods, this guy is obviously a poser, please get rid of him!
I'm not going to use the "toss up" explanation ....it will be a UK win.Kentucky can beat Louisville this year and Louisville can beat Kentucky...it is a Toss Up to me...both Schools IMO will be Bowl Eligible going into the game
And Louisville put up 44 and Kentucky had Dupree and Smith while UofL playing their 3rd String QB
Don't care for Deener. Self proclaimed UK fan is far to heavy lean towards the Cats. Billy Reed on the other hand is a legend in this area and has a wealth of knowledge. He is very good and basically speaks common sense. I feel like he is the one guy around here who will tell it like it is. Count me as a big fan of Billy Reed. I wish he was on Deener's show more often. Heck, I wish he had Denner's show instead of Deener.
The fact your defending that comparison shows how ignorant you are of football outside ul. Every person on the Patriots team was a nfl receiver. UL had 3 guys off that team make an nfl roster??? He might of loved to have parker but I'm sure he's happy with the rest of his wr's over anyone else on that ul team.That was Jared Steelman who used to be on 680. But honestly, if you listened to him it actually made a lot of sense and quite honestly I think Brady would have had UofL's crop of receivers. A lot of the callers agreed. Like I said, if you could go back and hear it, it made a lot of sense.
Oh wow!I am going to warn you. Don't bring up Steelers name. You don't know him personally so you aren't allowed to talk about him. I got chastised on Friday for bringing up his name. I just wanted help in clarifying some info and I got hammered. Just a little friendly advice. Keep his name out of your mouth or he'll be after you.
Billy Reed on the other hand is a legendary @sshole in this area and has a wealth of knowledge that is totally fabricated from his own hypocritical opinions and self serving BS. He is not very good and basically speaks from a drunken stupor. I feel like he is the one guy around here who will bad mouth UK at just about every chance he gets. Count me as a big fan of Billy Reed. I wish he was on Deener's show more often. Heck, I wish he had Denner's show instead of Deener.
The "3rd string" nonsense makes you look stupid. What does it say about your coaching staff when that 3rd string QB clearly should have been playing instead of Bonnafon? You should consider yourself lucky Bonnafon got hurt and that "3rd string QB" came in, cause you were getting your ass kicked with your 1st/2nd string QB. What an idiotic, tired response.
You act as if UK caught a break when Bonnafon went down. Sorry. You guys were clearly the ones that benefited from that, so save your 3rd string response. Just makes you look dumb.
I'm not going to use the "toss up" explanation ....it will be a UK win.
Kentucky had spent 2 weeks preparing to defend a poor throwing mobile QB, the D was built and focused on stacking the box and stopping UL's run game. Not that hard to figure out why what happened in the game if your football intelligence is beyond pop warner.
Auburn will have the same gameplan in a month FWIW. Better hope your coaches have a counter plan.
UK will beat your Cards this year....again mark it down.We will see...as of 2 August 2015 Louisville is the Favorite according to the Boys in Vegas
I'm pretty sure (and I could be wrong here) that Fields was the Big XII defensive freshman of the year which isn't quite the same as the defensive POY. I think UL has a really good front seven but I also don't think it's elite or any better than what we see every week in the SEC. Boom was burning you guys to the edges every play, Georgia torched you for an all-time SEC rushing record, and in the second half of the FSU game their freshman RB was burning your defense up too. UL's defense benefitted from playing some very offensively challenged teams last year. Clemson was supposed to present a challenge to the defense but when Watson went out they sucked. UL's defense played really well and shut down a good offense in NC St but other than that I can't think of a good offense they stopped last year. In the governors cup UK's front 7 looked better than UL's
I'm pretty sure (and I could be wrong here) that Fields was the Big XII defensive freshman of the year which isn't quite the same as the defensive POY. I think UL has a really good front seven but I also don't think it's elite or any better than what we see every week in the SEC. Boom was burning you guys to the edges every play, Georgia torched you for an all-time SEC rushing record, and in the second half of the FSU game their freshman RB was burning your defense up too. UL's defense benefitted from playing some very offensively challenged teams last year. Clemson was supposed to present a challenge to the defense but when Watson went out they sucked. UL's defense played really well and shut down a good offense in NC St but other than that I can't think of a good offense they stopped last year. In the governors cup UK's front 7 looked better than UL's
Couple of good points made in this thread.
First, P.E. is right when he says either team could win the rivalry game this year. I think as of now it is a true toss up. And a ton can happen between now and the game - good and bad - for both teams. I just love that we appear to finally be in an era when both teams are at least decent.
I do think the Card front 7 is going to be very good again. Best part of their team, no question.
I also firmly believe that if R.B. doesn't get hurt, UK wins that game last year going away. RB was rattled and ineffective. The pressure was getting to him and he wasn't looking down the field much. UK had a ton of momentum and could have easily stretched out that early lead. To Bolin's credit, he came in and repeatedly found UK's vulnerability. (our secondary, which is still a concern this year)
Regardless, last year showed the talent gap between the schools had narrowed considerably. Without the Cards high profile (and good to very good) troubled transfers, I'd be very confident in a Cat win this year. As it is, promises to be an entertaining game between 2 good teams.
Just as some Cat fans will never give the Cards credit for being a good team, most Card fans are either unaware or purposely ignorant that this Cat program is improving very quickly under Stoops.
Btw, living in Louisville, I can tell you that there are good people on both sides of this rivalry. And complete jerks too. I want to beat the *&^% out of Louisville when we play them. But I also know that the most fanatic on both sides that are sure that the rival has only the worst type of people, well, that is just dumb.
I kind of disagree. I don't think UK is bowl eligible without Louisville this season.Kentucky can beat Louisville this year and Louisville can beat Kentucky...it is a Toss Up to me...both Schools IMO will be Bowl Eligible going into the game
I see you getting the other 3 OOC Games, Vanderbilt, Florida and Mississippi State with a shot at South CarolinaI kind of disagree. I don't think UK is bowl eligible without Louisville this season.
Also...when Watson went out Midway into the 2nd Quarter the Clemson Offense had 5 Total Yards
I see you getting the other 3 OOC Games, Vanderbilt, Florida and Mississippi State with a shot at South Carolina
Fantastic and IMO accurate post..the talent gap is GONE...Kentucky is as talented as anyone outside of Georgia and Tennessee in the SEC East...yes a Card Fan Is saying this...JMO it is going to come down to mindset for your team if they have a successful season