That's one reason.It’s because espn has the women’s tournament so they are hyping the hell out of it.
It’s because espn has the women’s tournament so they are hyping the hell out of it.
Are they making money on it? My understanding is that the ratings aren't really all that great. But, if they've already invested in it, might as well try to maximize it's value, for whatever it's worth.ESPN is promoting a product they make money on. Shocker, I know...
Last year's the women's Final Four got better ratings than the men's. They're trying to keep that momentum going. But even if they're not making a profit on it yet, the more they have a financial interest to promote those games.Are they making money on it? My understanding is that the ratings aren't really all that great. But, if they've already invested in it, might as well try to maximize it's value, for whatever it's worth.
Without Clark, I don't see it.Last year's the women's Final Four got better ratings than the men's. They're trying to keep that momentum going. But even if they're not making a profit on it yet, the more they have a financial interest to promote those games.