That’s 2 scheduled zooms. Him and Thomas Jr.
Would love to get em.
I'm with you, I feel there are better options out there. But Pope and experience might bring more consistency to his game. The big problem for me is I really think we need to get much better defensively.I don't want him!
Way too streaky....
Me either really, I mean I’d take him because he obviously has serious scoring ability in him but I’d prefer a couple options ahead of him but I’ll defer to the staff to get who they think will fit best.I don't want him!
Way too streaky....
Most good shooters are streaky. Reeves, Grady, Brea all had stretches or games where they couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn. Just need those to be isolated.I don't want him!
Way too streaky....
Well you need to get used to the lower tiers being the feeders first the bigger tiers. That’s eventually how this is all going to shake out.My thoughts are, I'm fine eithbthis if Pope wants him. But I really only want high end midmajor and power conference transfers (as best we can). A low major transfer is fine, but we only need one or two of them, tops. If its this guy? I'm all for it. Just need to be cautious that at the end of the day, the team has as many high level players as possible.
I think Pope learned a valuable lesson after the injuries this year. You try to land as many legitimate ball handlers as possible, push for retention, but if you make a guy upset along the way due to lack of playing time, so be it.My thoughts are, I'm fine eithbthis if Pope wants him. But I really only want high end midmajor and power conference transfers (as best we can). A low major transfer is fine, but we only need one or two of them, tops. If its this guy? I'm all for it. Just need to be cautious that at the end of the day, the team has as many high level players as possible.
Eaglestaff was also #1 player on scouting report …he won’t be #1 at UK…give him better looks with better players around him and also Pope offense will create better shots for him.Most good shooters are streaky. Reeves, Grady, Brea all had stretches or games where they couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn. Just need those to be isolated.
Almost no player can get 50 pts one night...Eaglestaff was also #1 player on scouting report …he won’t be #1 at UK…give him better looks and also Pope offense will create better shots for him
Yup. Which is one reason I'm hyped about our future. Because unless they just happened to get luckier than what is actually statistically possible, our staff has already proven they have a serious knack for plucking diamonds out of that lower tier rough.Well you need to get used to the lower tiers being the feeders first the bigger tiers. That’s eventually how this is all going to shake out.
Yeah Wilkerson over Eaglestaff for me.I’m not this guys biggest fan but if pope wants him then let’s get him. I like kam Williams and Wilkerson a lot better
Are they mutually exclusive though?I’m not this guys biggest fan but if pope wants him then let’s get him. I like kam Williams and Wilkerson a lot better
I can see us adding 4-5 portal players: a center, 2 fours, a wing, a point guard. I could see him only adding one player at the the 1,2, or 3 but I don't know how we could only add 2 players at the 4/5 spots with only Garrison, Moreno, and Noah to play those spots. Unless Pope thinks Noah or Moreno will be too good to not play next year.Are they mutually exclusive though?
I think there's an assumption that Pope has to be committed to playing Perry and Noah rotation minutes next year, but I'm not sold on that quite yet.
We know Lewis probably fills out the Kriisa role, but most are assuming Pope just wants two additional guards from the portal because of Lewis' presence. I'm not so sure. I could see Pope adding three guards/wings (one point guard, one combo, and one big guard/wing).
His goal is to win a national title, not make a bunch of role players happy.
Yes, 3pt shooting is more streaky than 2's or FTs. But he is way more streaky than any of those.Most good shooters are streaky. Reeves, Grady, Brea all had stretches or games where they couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn. Just need those to be isolated.
No one would have expected Oweh to do what he did this year either. Definitely want this guy, he's shown he can do it against big time programs, and with better players around him and a coach like Pope guiding him, sky is the limit for this kinda guy.I love this kid as a foundational piece to next year's roster. He looks like the type of guy who becomes your third or fourth option.
Oweh is your bona fide stud, and then hopefully UK can add a guy like Wilkerson as the #2 option.
You could say that same thing about most of the top perimeter players in the portal.Eaglestaff was also #1 player on scouting report …he won’t be #1 at UK…give him better looks with better players around him and also Pope offense will create better shots for him.
Deference to the professional coaches in roster decisions is reasonable.Me either really, I mean I’d take him because he obviously has serious scoring ability in him but I’d prefer a couple options ahead of him but I’ll defer to the staff to get who they think will fit best.
NeverThis raising the age-old question raised so many times on Rafters over the years: Can you have too many shooters?
My opinion: No, you cannot. Have too many shooters, that is.
Every kid in the portal that averages 15+/gm is the only or top scoring threat on his team.It's crazy that people don't want this guy. Dropped 51 points in a game and also 40 against Bama. Wanna know why he's streaky? Because he's legitimately the only scoring threat for his team. If he's shooting those splits being the only guy (Meaning taking a lot of bad shots) there's no reason he can't be a high 30's- mid 40's 3 point percentage shooter on a team where he's not going to he the focal point. He can create his own shot as well, something this team severely lacks since Robinson went down. Although Brea has improved in that category.
That is a big reason too.I'm more concerned about his negative defensive efficiency rating. Especially when compared to his offense efficiency rating. He gives up more points than he scores per 100 possessions. No thanks.
Nor can you have too many big men.This raises the age-old question debated so many times on Rafters over the years: Can you have too many shooters?
My opinion: No, you cannot. Have too many shooters, that is.