ADVERTISEMENT

Does the snow storm disprove climate change?

ymmot31

All-American
Gold Member
Sep 17, 2004
33,555
113,837
113
Are you under the impression that the abnormally cold temperatures coupled with historic amounts of snow go toward proving man made global warming is just a thinly veiled attempt by our government to extract more money from us and to gain more control over us?

If you do, I believe you are mistaken. It was just weather. Don't feel bad though, the people that call 2015 the hottest year on record because of a statistically irrelevant increase of .02°F are just as far off base.

The next time someone tells you about oil companies pumping money into the "climate deniers" pockets, remind them that NASA, the source of the measurements, is a subsidiary of the US Commerce Dept. Not only does the government have more money than all the oil companies combined, by nature they are required to increase power to sustain control. What better way to achieve this goal? Tax the people for nature being nature.
 
Keep your replies short please, no need for clutter.
 
YOU ARE ALL SCIENCE DENIERS AND WILL BURN IN HELL FOR YOUR IGNORANCE. THIS EXTREME COLD WEATHER CONDITION IS A FREAK ABERRATION OF NATURE CAUSED BY THE SIDE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE DUE TO CO2 EMISSIONS IN OUR ATMOSPHERE. WHO ARE YOU TO ARGUE WITH 3,457 OF THE MOST QUALIFIED, EDUCATED AND SMARTEST SCIENTISTS IN THE WORLD. YES--YOU, WHO ARE NOTHING AND STUPID. NOW GO AWAY AND LIVE YOUR STUPID LITTLE LIFE. LET THOSE OF US WHO ARE WAY SMARTER MAKE YOUR DECISIONS FOR YOU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WayneDougan
What is proves is that if you are stupid then you should refrain from participating in matters of importance.
 
What is proves is that if you are stupid then you should refrain from participating in matters of importance.

What is the meaning of is? Is that the kind of attention to detail you apply to your global warming studies?
 
CO2 is a greenhouse gas. That is beyond dispute. We are dramatically increasing CO2 in the atmosphere to levels higher than they have been in 850,000 years and steadily climbing. From 300ppm to 400ppm and heading towards 600ppm before anything meaningful can even possibly be done to stop it.

Unless you can explain how it would be possible to dramatically increase the amount of a greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and not change climate then you simply have to be willing to ignore science (which many of you are) and instead believe in utter nonsense.

It is that simple. How do you increase the greenhouse gas content of the atmosphere without impacting climate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaBossIsBack
Don't feel bad though, the people that call 2015 the hottest year on record because of a statistically irrelevant increase of .02°F are just as far off base.
This statement alone disqualifies you from participating meaningfully in this thread. You blatantly have no idea of the consequences of a global trend in temperature upwards at even .02F. Please, just shut up as you are trolling and yet blatantly stupid simultaneously.
 
No one ever says that CO2 isn't a greenhouse gas. Do you acknowledge that there are other greenhouse gasses as well?
 
Shut up and go away. You are not worth wasting my Sunday on. I cannot help you. I am content to allow you to wallow in your own idiocy. The world has moved on and left you and your kind behind.

The United States DOD is scenario planning for climate change. Every scientific organization on earth with a national or international standing is in agreement on climate change. There really is no audience left for dithering idiots to loft up wads of nonsense in hopes of stalling progress. You are free to remain with your kind and discuss amongst yourselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaBossIsBack
Our government is so powerful and so influential that in their bid to expand power and create a global myth that the world is heating up, they've been able to fool/coerce/pay off the vast majority of the world's scientists. Thank god we've figured it out on the message board. Be afraid, everyone. Fight back. Don't let the government/all the scientists fool you. Stay woke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaBossIsBack
Statements by concurring organizations to Anthropogenic Global Warming:

The National Science Academies of the following countries:

of Australia,
of Belgium,
of Brazil,
of Cameroon,
Royal Society of Canada,
of the Caribbean,
of China,
Institut de France,
of Ghana,
Leopoldina of Germany,
of Indonesia,
of Ireland,
Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy,
of India,
of Japan,
of Kenya,
of Madagascar,
of Malaysia,
of Mexico,
of Nigeria,
Royal Society of New Zealand,
Russian Academy of Sciences,
of Senegal,
of South Africa,
of Sudan,
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences,
of Tanzania,
of Turkey,
of Uganda,
The Royal Society of the United Kingdom,
of the United States,
of Zambia,
and of Zimbabwe.

Concurring statements issued by the following Scientific Institutions with National or International Standing:

European Academy of Sciences and Arts
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Network of African Science Academies
Royal Society of New Zealand
Polish Academy of Sciences
National Research Council (US)
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Meteorological Society
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Institute of Physics
Australian Institute of Physics
European Physical Society
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
American Geophysical Union European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of London
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
American Meteorological Society
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
World Meteorological Organization
American Quaternary AssociationThe American Quaternary Association International Union for Quaternary Research
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Society for Microbiology
Australian Coral Reef Society
Institute of Biology (UK)
Society of American Foresters
The Wildlife Society (international)
American Academy of Pediatrics
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Medical Association
American Public Health Association
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Health Organization
American Astronomical Society
American Statistical Association
Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia)
International Association for Great Lakes Research
Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand

Dissenting Opinions from Scientific Institutions with National or International standing:

None.
 
Look Z, I know that you are one of the lemmings that follows in lockstep with everything your government tells you. I understand that you think the government is best equipped to micromanage each and every aspect of our lives. But how do you explain CO2 being the sole cause for warming despite the 18 year hiatus in warming?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pikespeak1
Our government is so powerful and so influential that in their bid to expand power and create a global myth that the world is heating up, they've been able to fool/coerce/pay off the vast majority of the world's scientists. Thank god we've figured it out on the message board. Be afraid, everyone. Fight back. Don't let the government/all the scientists fool you. Stay woke.
More trolling yet tragically stupid as well. So the United States can get the Soviet Union and China to go along with our scheme as well as all our other most bitter enemies? Not to mention somehow getting every scientific institution on earth to buy in on it? This, supposedly by some form of bribery when the opposing side has every big energy company on earth with their pocketbooks open funding individual quack scientists right and left a la the Big Tobacco playbook and we outbid them in every single instance? Worldwide?

Sounds legit. You're onto something there, Einstein.
 
WITH EMPHASIS!!!!!! THESE PEOPLE ARE REALLY REALLY SMART. WAY SMARTER THAN YOU. YOU ARE LIKE A TINY AKLOID SPECK COMPARED TO A GIANT CRIOSTAPHERE COMPARED TO THEM.

DO NOT DENY THEIR BRILLIANCE AND DO NOT DENY SCIENCE. IT IS FUTILL.

The National Science Academies of the following countries:

of Australia,
of Belgium,
of Brazil,
of Cameroon,
Royal Society of Canada,
of the Caribbean,
of China,
Institut de France,
of Ghana,
Leopoldina of Germany,
of Indonesia,
of Ireland,
Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy,
of India,
of Japan,
of Kenya,
of Madagascar,
of Malaysia,
of Mexico,
of Nigeria,
Royal Society of New Zealand,
Russian Academy of Sciences,
of Senegal,
of South Africa,
of Sudan,
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences,
of Tanzania,
of Turkey,
of Uganda,
The Royal Society of the United Kingdom,
of the United States,
of Zambia,
and of Zimbabwe.

Concurring statements issued by the following Scientific Institutions with National or International Standing:

European Academy of Sciences and Arts
International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sciences
Network of African Science Academies
Royal Society of New Zealand
Polish Academy of Sciences
National Research Council (US)
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Meteorological Society
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Institute of Physics
Australian Institute of Physics
European Physical Society
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
American Geophysical Union European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
Geological Society of America
Geological Society of London
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
American Meteorological Society
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
World Meteorological Organization
American Quaternary AssociationThe American Quaternary Association International Union for Quaternary Research
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Society for Microbiology
Australian Coral Reef Society
Institute of Biology (UK)
Society of American Foresters
The Wildlife Society (international)
American Academy of Pediatrics
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Medical Association
American Public Health Association
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Health Organization
American Astronomical Society
American Statistical Association
Engineers Australia (The Institution of Engineers Australia)
International Association for Great Lakes Research
Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand
 
  • Like
Reactions: ymmot31
Make nonsense laden circular arguments that are designed to keep the issue muddled rather than intelligently come to an understanding. Look, I've seen it all before. You can ask your tired old idiotic questions that are pointless and reveal an utter lack of understanding of the issue, I get it. But again, realize you no longer have an audience. The world has moved on and left you to your ignorance.

An idiot that doesn't even understand how greenhouse gasses work is actually trying to participate in this thread. What more do you need to know? The ignorant cannot be helped so they simply will be left behind. That is evolution at its finest. You are perfectly free to believe anything you want to but understand the entire collective body of the world's greatest minds has deemed you worthless to entertain and will ignore you and your kind as you have identified yourselves as useless to scientific understanding.
 
Z, please accept this gift.

preparation-information-H.I.C.jpg
 
CO2 is a greenhouse gas. That is beyond dispute. We are dramatically increasing CO2 in the atmosphere to levels higher than they have been in 850,000 years and steadily climbing. From 300ppm to 400ppm and heading towards 600ppm before anything meaningful can even possibly be done to stop it.

Unless you can explain how it would be possible to dramatically increase the amount of a greenhouse gas in the atmosphere and not change climate then you simply have to be willing to ignore science (which many of you are) and instead believe in utter nonsense.

It is that simple. How do you increase the greenhouse gas content of the atmosphere without impacting climate?
The composition of the atmosphere did change/is changing/will always change. The degree that any those changes impact the climate on their own is in dispute - quite large to infinitesimal. Throw other events on top of that such as sunspots & volcanic eruptions & water content of the air & I think those that think they know close to the likely impact are way to proud of their thoughts.
 
He dodged the question about the other greenhouse gasses because that is where his argument falls apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pikespeak1
I would like for him to explain how, when the climate models were proven wrong and the heat did not continue to increase, the narrative changed to "the heat is hiding in the oceans".
 
  • Like
Reactions: pikespeak1
YOU ARE ALL SCIENCE DENIERS AND WILL BURN IN HELL FOR YOUR IGNORANCE. THIS EXTREME COLD WEATHER CONDITION IS A FREAK ABERRATION OF NATURE CAUSED BY THE SIDE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE DUE TO CO2 EMISSIONS IN OUR ATMOSPHERE. WHO ARE YOU TO ARGUE WITH 3,457 OF THE MOST QUALIFIED, EDUCATED AND SMARTEST SCIENTISTS IN THE WORLD. YES--YOU, WHO ARE NOTHING AND STUPID. NOW GO AWAY AND LIVE YOUR STUPID LITTLE LIFE. LET THOSE OF US WHO ARE WAY SMARTER MAKE YOUR DECISIONS FOR YOU.

If climate change is real name a place in the world where the climate has changed in the past one hundred years.
 
Not only does the government have more money than all the oil companies combined, by nature they are required to increase power to sustain control.

ever heard of ALEC?

the idea that the government exists entirely outside the influence of oil companies is utterly ludicrous
 
yeah it's all a conspiracy of Big Climatology's greedhead researchers

this should be merged into the political thread so i don't have to look at it
 
I believe the moon is a frog's ass. Look, there it is. See, I told you.
This is literally the same logic used to explain global warming. You are a sucker, tricked into wasting your time freaking out over a myth. Belief in global warming requires you to willingly suspend disbelief. When is the last time you had a thought of you own on anything?
 
yeah it's all a conspiracy of Big Climatology's greedhead researchers

this should be merged into the political thread so i don't have to look at it
I wouldn't know, but it must be painful when you realize you've been so gullible over the years. Science proves that man made global warming has been drastically overstated. Why do you and the others continue to ignore science?
 
This is literally the same logic used to explain global warming. You are a sucker, tricked into wasting your time freaking out over a myth. Belief in global warming requires you to willingly suspend disbelief. When is the last time you had a thought of you own on anything?

yeah on average climate change deniers are extremely intelligent people and independent thinkers

sure
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckinden
I wouldn't know, but it must be painful when you realize you've been so gullible over the years. Science proves that man made global warming has been drastically overstated. Why do you and the others continue to ignore science?

this is really some elevated discourse here

kudos
 
When I explain to you that the climate models that predicted gloom and doom in the first place are wrong, you retort with I am stupid. Why don't you explain why they were wrong? None of you guys ever post anything compelling for your side other than some people agree that it is true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pikespeak1
All weather is proof of climate change. It's settled science. If you can't accept that then you're too stupid to understand it, earth hater.
 
I am not convinced one way or the other that we are effecting our climate change more than natural cycles do. But it amazes me at how one side is so incredibly adamant about our continued dependence on a non-renewable fuel source. Let's just contine to build shitty cities and shitty energy hog buildings because **** it... A little thought into our built environment doesn't propogate the continued lining of rich people's pockets.
 
Our industrialized civilization is very young. The non-renewable sources you are talking about are sufficient to sustain us for at least a couple thousand years going forward. Renewable sources will advance at their own pace over time. There is no pressing need to put undue pressure on society to advance them as quickly as possible. Don't pretend for a minute that rich people you demonize aren't profiting handsomely from alternative fuels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueworld_3.0
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT