Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meeks in '10 is a guaranteed championship & maybe 40-0, so I'm going that route.
Easy. MKG for four years.
Meeks in '10 had a shot at 40-0 and more than likely the title.
You sure?
First I thought Meeks in 10 but after further review you can't argue with this post.Yes.
You don't think a Senior MKG added to the '15 team goes 40-0 and wins the title? Senior MKG locks Dekker down for sure.
Plus Soph MKG keeps us out of the NIT in '13.
Then as a Junior, he probably wins the title again. Remember that team almost won the title anyway.
Three more years of MKG likely gets us two more titles plus keeps us out of the NIT in '13.
As far as hypotheticals go, this one is a no-brainier to me.
This might be a good one?
Would you rather have had Meeks on '10, or MKG for 4 years.
(mkg would have been a junior on '14 senior on '15)
Does MKG get to play on the 2012 team that won it all?
Because if that's the case. Since banners aren't guaranteed. I'd take the one year of Meeks in '10 and the one of MKG in '12 than take the last 3 years of MKG. I think Meeks in 2010 would've been as sure fire as a banner that we would get.
Unless my math is wrong, yes.
2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Well no Meeks no '10, but MKG on '15 we might win.
So basically we are swapping Meeks for the '10 or MKG for the '15. Pretty much a wash if you ask me.
But then MKG and Randle together against Uconn?
I think '15 had a hole in the roster that we filled with Lyles. MKG on '14 and '15 might have been back to back.
You sure?
Exactly how I feel. Damn, that 2010 team would have been unreal with Jodie.MKG in the long haul. But I sure as hell would have loved to have seen Meeks on that 2010 team. I have no doubt that team goes 40-0.
I think '15 had a hole in the roster that we filled with Lyles. MKG on '14 and '15 might have been back to back.
You sure?
Meeks. Kidd still cannot shot the ball.This might be a good one?
Would you rather have had Meeks on '10, or MKG for 4 years.
(mkg would have been a junior on '14 senior on '15)
2010 needed a 3 point shooter, Meeks filled that
While 2015 needed an MKG...they still were 38-1 and they had a guy to fill that role (Poythress) that got hurt. Defense was not a problem, we struggled in halfcourt sets at time..but our length and depth had us playing great D.
Sure, we remember the Wisconsin players we needed to stop...but we lost that game because we could not figure out any offense at the end of the year outside of KAT's post game.