If we go zone that means Willis and Murray on the wings. The two guys who give up the most penetration, a zone won't stop them from giving up drives.
If we go zone that means Willis and Murray on the wings. The two guys who give up the most penetration, a zone won't stop them from giving up drives.
Not playing some zone, boggles me, when all your bigs are in foul trouble, playing some zone may have saved them a foul or two considering most of the big guys fouled out because they were helping out on a guard who beat our guard into the lane.We are young, if u can't shoot free throws I can't play you, this is on me I must coach better. I have ruined this team. I think I will stand on sidelines and scream louder and never ever play a zone.
It is not a matter of can't teach but won't, but I believe you have to be prepared for any and everything and playing some zone once in awhile should be in the play book, you do what it takes to win the game. Kansas proved that, how many times do you think they practiced a triangle and 2. They were getting beat off the dribble, looked at our bigs and not huge threats and drew up a junk defense that worked.If you can't teach zone defense to a team of 5 star players, what does that say about your coaching skills? Zone defenses are some of the first defenses that young players are taught.
Good catch. Bourbon steered me wrong. That and watching IU vs Mich.
Agree.. nothing else needs to be said.Cal is a GREAT RECRUITER, without a doubt he's probably the best in college basketball. However, I do not think he is a good bench coach. I know I will catch a lot of flak for that statement, but when you have the No1 recruiting class for 6 straight years, you need more then 1 Championship, and I believe he had a couple of top recruiting classes at Memphis.
I know, I'm going to hear all the BS about how we've been to the Final Fours, etc., but he has been out-coached in the NCAA Tournament. Against U Conn twice and Wisconsin last year, and West Virginia with Wall and group.
OLD STOLL FIELD GUY!
He must have those quotes on a device that he can just leave at the podium and play after every loss every year.
Same old same old.
Cal has said he basically breaks down players and rebuilds them over the course of the season. It's hard to do this while teaching them to play both man and zone. I have made my peace with it. His goal is to get his guys to the NBA so he prepares them to play the way they play in the NBA. His guys have been pretty successful there. Fortunately I love the NBA, but if all you care about is UK winning, be prepared to be disappointed from time to time.
That is what bugs me. Cal is employed by UK, To win games, not to run a NBA development program. If he can do both , then fine. To lose big leads to inferior teams and lose the game is Low job performance. But I know what you are saying is true, this is how Cal has decided to run the program. I have accepted that, but I sure don't like it. Call me old school.
I'm not going to call you idiots because I have been censored, but I want to. Know that.
The space bar can be your friend if you allow it to be.IhateCal bashing but constructive critism is fine IMO! Cal has made it clear that THEY DO PRACTICE ZONE IN PRACTICE IN CASE WE NEED IT, and has also admited that he Prolly should use the zone more often after it worked wonders in other years!
I rarely critique Calbecause he's so good we should cut him a lotofslack but to say that there's NEVER a time to use a zone, even if it's just to keep the otherteamsgyesing is ridiculous, and hardheaded!
I agree, you are a better coach than Cal. What do you do for a living?
Do you realize UK has won more games in the past 6and a half years than any other team in the country? Do you realize UK has won by far the most tournament games in the last 6 and a half years? He's doing his damn job better than any other coach in the country and yet the bitching, whining, and moaning continues. You must be old school like our longest final four drought in the history of our program before Cal. Great times getting those role players and knowing we had no chance in hell of winning a title.That is what bugs me. Cal is employed by UK, To win games, not to run a NBA development program. If he can do both , then fine. To lose big leads to inferior teams and lose the game is Low job performance. But I know what you are saying is true, this is how Cal has decided to run the program. I have accepted that, but I sure don't like it. Call me old school.
I'm not making excuses, so I'll cut nothing out. My point is not to have a referendum on Cal's tenure. My point is that stating things like "we'd have X more wins/titles/Final Fours/etc... if we'd just play a zone" is ridiculous. Maybe? But there's trade offs for everything. It's a world of finite resources (in this case, practice time). If Cal gets a nice upperclassmen team, would he implement some zone defenses to throw other teams off? Maybe. I bet our offense would have new wrinkles, too. More out of bounds plays, you bet. Because that's the type of stuff you can do with a more experienced team - hence the notion that you can't win titles with freshmen teams (before Cal). But to argue that implementing a zone would have necessarily turned some losses to wins is pure idiocy. It's speculation, plain and simple, by posters who are upset after a loss.