ADVERTISEMENT

Caller asks Pope about the foul calls

If you go back and watch that game I don't think anyone in the front office of the SEC can tell you what rules they use to make some of those calls, they let the game get out of hand, did not call the game even close to even just look at the free throw difference. They were not even consistent in what they did call or did not call.
 
If you go back and watch that game I don't think anyone in the front office of the SEC can tell you what rules they use to make some of those calls, they let the game get out of hand, did not call the game even close to even just look at the free throw difference. They were not even consistent in what they did call or did not call.
The reels of phantom fouls that I’ve seen people compile is pretty astounding. You know it’s happening when you’re watching but seeing them again is something else.
 
There is bad and then there is blatantly biased (inconsistent). Bad is tolerable if still fair. Inconsistently biased is not tolerable.

But between:
- sliding 10’ on your back with the ball but no travel call
- a take down and pin to the floor that would get a 10 yard penalty on any offensive lineman, right in front of baseline ref, and not called
- multiple untouched or barely touched flops called fouls (one on Robinson on baseline, one on Butler on 3pt shot, maybe a third one)
- and lots of other inconsistent calls/no-calls not called the same on the 2 ends of the court


Had the game been called fairly, would we have won? Maybe not based on bad shooting. But it would have been much closer, we would have had a chance. Or maybe the shooting got worse as result of frustration of the biased officiating, we will never know.
 
If you go back and watch that game I don't think anyone in the front office of the SEC can tell you what rules they use to make some of those calls, they let the game get out of hand, did not call the game even close to even just look at the free throw difference. They were not even consistent in what they did call or did not call.
I’m just glad Pope and staff have contacted SEC offices and aren’t gonna let that shit slide.
 
There is bad and then there is blatantly biased (inconsistent). Bad is tolerable if still fair. Inconsistently biased is not tolerable.

But between:
- sliding 10’ on your back with the ball but no travel call
- a take down and pin to the floor that would get a 10 yard penalty on any offensive lineman, right in front of baseline ref, and not called
- multiple untouched or barely touched flops called fouls (one on Robinson on baseline, one on Butler on 3pt shot, maybe a third one)
- and lots of other inconsistent calls/no-calls not called the same on the 2 ends of the court


Had the game been called fairly, would we have won? Maybe not based on bad shooting. But it would have been much closer, we would have had a chance. Or maybe the shooting got worse as result of frustration of the biased officiating, we will never know.
You can slide 40' if want until you stop.. Just can't turn over or try to get up after that.. The rest I agree with..
 
Refs love a home crowd against UK. Won’t be the last time this season that the whistle is blown egregiously in one direction
Remember about 5 or 6 years ago the NCAA said that basketball was not football, but a game of finesse and movement and should be called that way? Whatever happened to that? None of the refs were willing to call 120 fouls a game to stop it so the NCAA just blew it off and here we are with pushing in the lower back, holding the rim when unnecessary to protect oneself, arm bars, flopping, mugging, holding, throwing people to the ground and I could go on for a few more sentences. If something isn't done, it's going to be a Triple A league for NBA aspirants with thuggery being the most important skill, if you can call it that. By today's rules, I guess it is considered a skill.
 
There is bad and then there is blatantly biased (inconsistent). Bad is tolerable if still fair. Inconsistently biased is not tolerable.

But between:
- sliding 10’ on your back with the ball but no travel call
- a take down and pin to the floor that would get a 10 yard penalty on any offensive lineman, right in front of baseline ref, and not called
- multiple untouched or barely touched flops called fouls (one on Robinson on baseline, one on Butler on 3pt shot, maybe a third one)
- and lots of other inconsistent calls/no-calls not called the same on the 2 ends of the court


Had the game been called fairly, would we have won? Maybe not based on bad shooting. But it would have been much closer, we would have had a chance. Or maybe the shooting got worse as result of frustration of the biased officiating, we will never know.
Enraging....he's right there with a clear look on both







A good rule of thumb on the fouls, never blow the whistle unless it's undeniable, in my opinion it's better to miss a foul, then call one that's not there
 
There is bad and then there is blatantly biased (inconsistent). Bad is tolerable if still fair. Inconsistently biased is not tolerable.

But between:
- sliding 10’ on your back with the ball but no travel call
- a take down and pin to the floor that would get a 10 yard penalty on any offensive lineman, right in front of baseline ref, and not called
- multiple untouched or barely touched flops called fouls (one on Robinson on baseline, one on Butler on 3pt shot, maybe a third one)
- and lots of other inconsistent calls/no-calls not called the same on the 2 ends of the court


Had the game been called fairly, would we have won? Maybe not based on bad shooting. But it would have been much closer, we would have had a chance. Or maybe the shooting got worse as result of frustration of the biased officiating, we will never

There is bad and then there is blatantly biased (inconsistent). Bad is tolerable if still fair. Inconsistently biased is not tolerable.

But between:
- sliding 10’ on your back with the ball but no travel call
- a take down and pin to the floor that would get a 10 yard penalty on any offensive lineman, right in front of baseline ref, and not called
- multiple untouched or barely touched flops called fouls (one on Robinson on baseline, one on Butler on 3pt shot, maybe a third one)
- and lots of other inconsistent calls/no-calls not called the same on the 2 ends of the court


Had the game been called fairly, would we have won? Maybe not based on bad shooting. But it would have been much closer, we would have had a chance. Or maybe the shooting got worse as result of frustration of the biased officiating, we will never know.
There is no travel for just sliding on your back as long as you don’t attempt to stand up or roll over. But other than that, the ref were definitely biased toward Georgia. Sad this seems to happen to UK regularly.
 
He hesitates and then says he has to be careful about what he says , “We've got to learn how it's being called." We're not interested in what the rules say, we're interested in what is being called... The rules that are written aren't be enforced."
“Based on our whistle in our first two SEC games, we’re doing in-depth study right now on — we’re not interested in what the rules are, we’re interested in the rules that are being called,” he said. “We want to push the envelope as far as we can toward the rules that are being called more than just following the rules that are written. … We’re learning the whistle right now. We got a massive education on the whistle last night.”

Great response and the last line made me lol
 
The reels of phantom fouls that I’ve seen people compile is pretty astounding. You know it’s happening when you’re watching but seeing them again is something else.
I've seen several posted on various social media platforms. After watching them the officiating was worse than I thought( how that is even possible astounds me)
 
Enraging....he's right there with a clear look on both







A good rule of thumb on the fouls, never blow the whistle unless it's undeniable, in my opinion it's better to miss a foul, then call one that's not there
Aren't they supposed to call obvious flopping against the perpetrator?
The fact that the player isn't too embarrassed to even try that, confounds me.
Throwing the head back to fake contact also pisses me off.
You young pu$$ies get off my lawn!
 
Wish he was more specific. I did not know there are different rules for different conferences and different teams? Pope needs to get to know the refs we have a history with. Figure out how to overcome the bias with those few. Or recruit good enough to blow everybody out so the refs have no chance. Any idea's of what calls he is referring to that are different than the way he is used to?
 
He hesitates and then says he has to be careful about what he says , “We've got to learn how it's being called." We're not interested in what the rules say, we're interested in what is being called... The rules that are written aren't be enforced."
He ain't wrong. Travels, palming the ball, flopping, hanging on the rim and the list goes on and on of things that doesn't get called. He is certainly right that the game isn't called the way the rules are written anymore. I watched Kansas last night and KJ Adams did a chin up and pulled 1/2 of his upper body above the rim on a dunk when nobody was around him and he was in no danger of falling with no technical call. Against us Cyril jerked and pulled on the rim like he was trying to tear the goal down on a dunk with no technical call. UGA flopped on every trip down the floor trying to get a call and was a technical called for flopping like the rule states? No a foul was called on us. It's a flipping joke to watch how much stuff officials let go these days. It almost makes the game unwatchable.
 
traveling, palming the ball, hanging on the rim. While they bother me (since against the rules), every team does these things and gets away with them. What is most concerning is the inconsistencies, AND the FLOPPING. To me FLOPPING is the biggest wus play a player can make. IMO a player who flops is a straight ass p*ssy. But worse than that is refs rewarding players who do it by often putting them at the line.
Every P5 game is televised. Simply put a 4th ref in the video room, who can quickly watch the video and if he sees something (either that the player may have flopped, or that there was possibly head/neck contact, he can flip a switch turning a yellow light on at the scorers table indicating the floor refs need to review it). Simple. AND enforce the No Flopping penalties. I've yet to see anything more than a Warning called for flopping, and have only seen 2-3 Warnings. Once you start ENFORCING the no flopping rule, players will stop doing it; but if you keep rewarding flopping then of course they will continue to do it.
 
Enraging....he's right there with a clear look on both







A good rule of thumb on the fouls, never blow the whistle unless it's undeniable, in my opinion it's better to miss a foul, then call one that's not there
First video , it’s a correct call. Shooter is entitled for space to land . Butler takes that away. No complains there.

Second video and third are jokes not to call travel or flopping.
 
Kinda off topic a little bit because all teams including KY does it, but the double dribble call has been done away with evidently. I have lost count how many times a game I see a guy catch the ball, dribble one time, stand there and then dribble again. Especially post players.
 
He ain't wrong. Travels, palming the ball, flopping, hanging on the rim and the list goes on and on of things that doesn't get called. He is certainly right that the game isn't called the way the rules are written anymore. I watched Kansas last night and KJ Adams did a chin up and pulled 1/2 of his upper body above the rim on a dunk when nobody was around him and he was in no danger of falling with no technical call. Against us Cyril jerked and pulled on the rim like he was trying to tear the goal down on a dunk with no technical call. UGA flopped on every trip down the floor trying to get a call and was a technical called for flopping like the rule states? No a foul was called on us. It's a flipping joke to watch how much stuff officials let go these days. It almost makes the game unwatchable.
Correction, it does make the game unwatchable.
 
He hesitates and then says he has to be careful about what he says , “We've got to learn how it's being called." We're not interested in what the rules say, we're interested in what is being called... The rules that are written aren't be enforced."
Well welll…. This is going to be interesting…SEC it is what it is today in basketball including officiating because Kentucky . While at Kentucky Cal has lobbied for more investment in basketball facilities, coaches, players, NIL money, rule changing in officiating having as base a stronger sec will benefit everyone ( schools, more money, more teams in NCAA tournament) and of course will benefit Kentucky having to play against stronger in conference competition.

A lot of the items that Kentucky and Calipari asked in all sec meetings did happened and are happening.

So part of the officiating tendencies in Sec is to encourage more teams in the NCAA tournament . How do you do that ? You let lesser basketball talented teams use their physical abilities and give that 10% home whistle court advantage.


If you recall there were couple calls against Kentucky recently that made the national news cause Calipari and Kentucky complained at SEC about it , showing the right tale and explanation and SeC did lobby for those rule changes for whole college basketball.

Now, we have a new coach. Pope does not have the same cloud (yet) as Calipari and Kentucky also lost some of it sec dominance. I will be very curious to see what Coach Pope correspondence with Sec brings.

One could argue that sec has the interest of not to have Kentucky buried in middle of sec, as flagship basketball conference program ….. but who knows other schools might a stronger voice than us right now.


Regardless, if Pope can see the light out of this and also establish himself as big dog ( cat) in the sec like calipari was.. it will be great. The rest, foul calls, travel, flopping , illegal screens not called the whole game are just part of what sec strategy of promoting more teams in NCAA tournament.
 
If you go back and watch that game I don't think anyone in the front office of the SEC can tell you what rules they use to make some of those calls, they let the game get out of hand, did not call the game even close to even just look at the free throw difference. They were not even consistent in what they did call or did not call.
The SEC or any conference will never admit they have rogue or bad refs. They will go to their graves giving the impression that their refs are the best in the sport. Even if they do review questionable games, I highly doubt any "boss" of a ref sits down in their weekly 1:1 and holds them accountable.

But I love Pope's approach. Much more diplomatic and going straight to the top rather than barking at the refs directly. But knowing how the referee cult works, my concern is that whomever Pope talks to, regardless of how diplomatic and nice he is, will still be pissed that anyone, ANYONE questions their authority in a game. Then Saturday rolls around and we end up with the trifecta - Pat Adams, Joe Lindsey, and Doug Shows.
 
The SEC or any conference will never admit they have rogue or bad refs. They will go to their graves giving the impression that their refs are the best in the sport. Even if they do review questionable games, I highly doubt any "boss" of a ref sits down in their weekly 1:1 and holds them accountable.

But I love Pope's approach. Much more diplomatic and going straight to the top rather than barking at the refs directly. But knowing how the referee cult works, my concern is that whomever Pope talks to, regardless of how diplomatic and nice he is, will still be pissed that anyone, ANYONE questions their authority in a game. Then Saturday rolls around and we end up with the trifecta - Pat Adams, Joe Lindsey, and Doug Shows.
The refs are not calling the games the way they do without the express blessing from conferences…
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude73
Enraging....he's right there with a clear look on both







A good rule of thumb on the fouls, never blow the whistle unless it's undeniable, in my opinion it's better to miss a foul, then call one that's not there
After watching the Kentucky on the road circus, my first road UK game @ Indiana on Dec. 7, 1974 (Bloomington) to now, I would say I've seen it all, but I know I haven't.

It's been this way since time immemorial, and the officials LOVE the road environment and to play to the crowd. They anticipate the PHANTOM FLOP, any contact (and it really doesn't even need to be physical contact, it can just LOOK like physical contact ... remember the UConn flop ... oh God that was classic) it never ends.

Coach Pope, if he hasn't learned, is going to have to. We have to be heard here. I think he can and will go about it in a classy way so as the league can save face with this ridiculosity. CMP is pure class, and hopefully they can make an impassioned case to show how badly this has gotten out of hand over ALL these years.

College basketball officiating is the single worst aspect of the modern game. Has been for years. It's time for a serious revamp.

NCAA headquarters, we're watching you.

BBN is watching you, you are called out.

Go Big Blue !
 
If you go back and watch that game I don't think anyone in the front office of the SEC can tell you what rules they use to make some of those calls, they let the game get out of hand, did not call the game even close to even just look at the free throw difference. They were not even consistent in what they did call or did not call.
I really thought that very bad calls were made over the entire game. The monitors were in use wat too much. In the end, I read that UK had 25 fouls while Georgia had 20. Cyril neutralized our inside presence while he was in the game, but he fouled out. The discrepancy in fouls called does not warrant all of the attention it seems to be getting. jmo
 
traveling, palming the ball, hanging on the rim. While they bother me (since against the rules), every team does these things and gets away with them. What is most concerning is the inconsistencies, AND the FLOPPING. To me FLOPPING is the biggest wus play a player can make. IMO a player who flops is a straight ass p*ssy. But worse than that is refs rewarding players who do it by often putting them at the line.
Every P5 game is televised. Simply put a 4th ref in the video room, who can quickly watch the video and if he sees something (either that the player may have flopped, or that there was possibly head/neck contact, he can flip a switch turning a yellow light on at the scorers table indicating the floor refs need to review it). Simple. AND enforce the No Flopping penalties. I've yet to see anything more than a Warning called for flopping, and have only seen 2-3 Warnings. Once you start ENFORCING the no flopping rule, players will stop doing it; but if you keep rewarding flopping then of course they will continue to do it.

I HATE flopping, but I also hate palming the ball... it's easier to be quick/get around a defender if you can run with the ball, but this isn't football or rugby.
 
GA allowed to play as aggressive as they could and UK not being allowed to do that is the most bothersome thing to me. It totally stymied any kind of defense because of so many of our guys getting in foul trouble. As bad as we shot the ball and rebounded the ball we still could have won with unbiased refs.
 
I really thought that very bad calls were made over the entire game. The monitors were in use wat too much. In the end, I read that UK had 25 fouls while Georgia had 20. Cyril neutralized our inside presence while he was in the game, but he fouled out. The discrepancy in fouls called does not warrant all of the attention it seems to be getting. jmo

Total foul calls has never been the best measure to see if a game is called evenly. Some teams essentially cheat by playing a rugby style basically taunting the officials b/c those coaches KNOW officials won't call all the fouls.

Just ONE TIME, I would love to see an official crew call all the fouls on a team who plays like that even if they foul out the entire team causing that team to forfeit... make the teams play within the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude73
I really thought that very bad calls were made over the entire game. The monitors were in use wat too much. In the end, I read that UK had 25 fouls while Georgia had 20. Cyril neutralized our inside presence while he was in the game, but he fouled out. The discrepancy in fouls called does not warrant all of the attention it seems to be getting. jmo

Heavily disagree, that was atrocious and its okay to admit it. Anyone actually paying attention to the game could see the glaring bias. It hurt us. I would even go as far as to say it cost us the game. Can't play to even half their potential when they can be wrapped up, hip checked, arm barred, and so on and so on. Got away with everything and some taunting to boot. But they can call a bunch of meaningless crap in the last few minutes on UGA when the game is out of reach and even it out, That way people go look at it and think "the discrepancy in fouls called does not warrant all of the attention it seems to be getting".

Game was a joke. Refs were a joke. Doesn't make you sore loser to say it when its true. Like I've said we lost to OSU and Clemson. This game was decided sometime before tip in a room with a bunch of greedy trash. Who wants to win like that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: crestcat
Cyril fouled out but, in the meantime, it seemed he could do anything he wanted to on both ends of the court. He camped out in the lane and if you touched him, it was a foul, but he had to draw blood with his fouls before they were called. He is a dominating player, but the way they let him play, at least home, contributes a lot to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crestcat
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT