ADVERTISEMENT

Calipari Era: Small Forward

Are you going for a record of thread starting? Sheesh.

7 threads on the 1st page. You should read more(not talking about the Bible) and post less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigKari
I can't remember Darnell ever starting. I can't believe you have placed him as one of the top 25 players to play for Cal. I wouldn't put him in the top 50
 
It's funny. The only small forwards under Cal that did much were Miller, MKG, and Young. And Miller was already here. Otherwise it's been power guys playing the 3 like Poy or a taller shooting guard like Booker. It'd be nice to have a solid 3 in his natural spot like Bridges or Isaac in the '16 class.
 
It's funny. The only small forwards under Cal that did much were Miller, MKG, and Young. And Miller was already here. Otherwise it's been power guys playing the 3 like Poy or a taller shooting guard like Booker. It'd be nice to have a solid 3 in his natural spot like Bridges or Isaac in the '16 class.

I would rather have a 3 that can handle the ball and pass like a guard than a true SF.

What made MKG great was that he could handle the ball and pass like a PG combined with the size of a forward.

It helped that we also had Davis, Jones and Miller, big guys that could handle and pass like guards as well.

Those guys aren't easy to find. We probably never see that again at UK, at least not to that extent.

Most teams are better off with a big guard than a small forward at the 3, IMHO.

Many of the recent champions have been three guard teams. Duke(Jones/Cook/Jones), UofL(Siva/Smith/Blackshear), and UConn(Walker/Napier/Lamb) have all won titles with a big guard at the 3.

It is a lot easier to find a 6'5-ish guard that can handle and pass to play the 3 than a 6'7-ish forward that can handle and pass to play the 3.

If we get another MKG, then great. I just don't think there are many of those guys.

As for Bridges, he's more of an undersized PF than a SF. If he improves his perimeter skills, he might be it.

Isaac might be the 3 you are talking about. I think he has the skills. He also has the length to play the 3 or 4.
 
I would rather have a 3 that can handle the ball and pass like a guard than a true SF.

What made MKG great was that he could handle the ball and pass like a PG combined with the size of a forward.

It helped that we also had Davis, Jones and Miller, big guys that could handle and pass like guards as well.

Those guys aren't easy to find. We probably never see that again at UK, at least not to that extent.

Most teams are better off with a big guard than a small forward at the 3, IMHO.

Many of the recent champions have been three guard teams. Duke(Jones/Cook/Jones), UofL(Siva/Smith/Blackshear), and UConn(Walker/Napier/Lamb) have all won titles with a big guard at the 3.

It is a lot easier to find a 6'5-ish guard that can handle and pass to play the 3 than a 6'7-ish forward that can handle and pass to play the 3.

If we get another MKG, then great. I just don't think there are many of those guys.

As for Bridges, he's more of an undersized PF than a SF. If he improves his perimeter skills, he might be it.

Isaac might be the 3 you are talking about. I think he has the skills. He also has the length to play the 3 or 4.
Isaac is exactly the small forward I'm envisioning. If Cal feels like Bridges has a place on the team, I'm all for it. But Isaac has the handles and shot of a guard with the length of a forward. He's the one I'm hoping for.
 
Devin Booker would be in the conversation as the most offensively potent at the position if we optimized offensive efficiency last season. In general, the 3 guard lineup is the superior strategy in college basketball.
 
I appreciate preacher tom posting articles on here as the board is stale and needs new topics

Of course I think if he had a different handle he would highly appreciated on here but since he has preacher in it many won't like him. That's just my 2 cents.
They will hate you for my names sake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treyforuk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT