It has become obvious to anyone who is looking that Cal's"model" the one and done is no longer ger effective, at least on a championship level. The game has changed, Cal hasn't
Cal stated his kids lost to men
- Thread starter YardCat
- Start date
Well who's fault is that when practically the entire roster turns over after every season??!! DUH!!!!
You can't create this environment of OAD and then when it suits you use it as an excuse when you lose.
You can't create this environment of OAD and then when it suits you use it as an excuse when you lose.
At UK Rick would have dictated the tempo and his team would have played smothering defense. I compare his coach at UK to Cal's coaching at UK....what either one of them did elsewhere doesn't make a damn difference to me.
If you discussing who is better, what’s better than head to head??? That’s the only way not to insert personal feelings and go by only facts.
First of all 90% of our problems is because our defense is putrid currently. That's the biggest issue. Cal said in his post game presser we have to learn handle physical play and protect ourselves somehow. So that got me to thinking about a couple different situations.
Around the time our the collapse of out defense in the Georgia game Big Z takes a shot to his ribs running down the court. No call. He goes for a rebound. The elbow he threw could be argued. Probably the right call.
Last night Mitchell's cylinder foul.
My question is this Georgia and SC were allowed to be extremely physical with us with minimum fouls called. So when we decided to by physical back we weren't giving the same leash. Why is our physical play frown upon bur Georgia and SC rewarded? What's the difference?
Around the time our the collapse of out defense in the Georgia game Big Z takes a shot to his ribs running down the court. No call. He goes for a rebound. The elbow he threw could be argued. Probably the right call.
Last night Mitchell's cylinder foul.
My question is this Georgia and SC were allowed to be extremely physical with us with minimum fouls called. So when we decided to by physical back we weren't giving the same leash. Why is our physical play frown upon bur Georgia and SC rewarded? What's the difference?
That doesn't account for Cal's lack of OOB defense or his ridiculous sub patterns including yanking Dilly when he got hot.
Good analogy. Wish Cal would give these issues as much thought and do something about it. But as long as he sends 4-6 guys to the NBA his mission is accomplished.
Everybody that gave me sh*t about this post can kiss my ass.
Not a damn thing because those men just did a carbon copy of it again except even worse.
Pisses me off that there was even an argument about it. Anybody that knows the game could recognize the deficiencies.
They had strengths and they had weaknesses. It’s like they focused on the strengths and ignored the weaknesses. That is always a path to failure.
Same people who said don't play Sharpe becuase it will ruin chemistry. Also the same people who said don't start Reed and Rob because it'll hurt team chemistry. Lol, some of these dudes don't know much about the sport. If cal does it, it's genius. After all, he's in the HOF.
Yes...it's like using we are "the youngest team in the country" BS 30+ games into the season.
These are the players he chose.....clearly he could have had a more physical team if he wanted to. By the way Cal this is the "no excuse program" your own words.
I didn’t mind it as long as they got minutes but after we start out down 10-0 every game it’s gotten real old. Not only that but we never play that combination of players ever again the entire game so why start them?
