Also never thought I could miss Dakari this much. He couldn't jump over a phonebook but he would fight and whack people!
I think everyone is forgetting the other side of the coin with DJ, he got his shot blocked and the ball stripped more times than he ever converted.Also never thought I could miss Dakari this much. He couldn't jump over a phonebook but he would fight and whack people!
SUNSAny NBA team that takes Skal in the first round will have to be willing to accept a very long development period - like several years, and even then I have my doubts he can overcome his deficiencies. Players who play scared and timid do not suddenly play aggressively - at least I have not seen it.
I agree, it's like they are actually getting worse.After such a long post I'd be remiss to say that I'm almost positive that at least some of us could help improve certain guys free throw percentages...and that is baffling to me.
It is all about upside and there will be teams willing to roll the dice. According to the experts, what qualifies one to be an expert must be a deep dark secret, he has plenty of upside.If he IS a 1st rounder I am putting my name in the draft because it must be a very weak draft this year. There are a lot of players in collage that are better than he is.
I agree 100%, that's why I don't get as tore up over the Cats as I did before. Refuse to let an NBA minor league team get me down. Most of these kids don't give a crap about college and are just (shooting) for a chance to get drafted. After all isn't that our number one goal?I'm worried about Skal's "potential" as a Wildcat - I couldn't give a frog's ass about his "potential" after he's drafted.
I'm worried about Skal's "potential" as a Wildcat - I couldn't give a frog's ass about his "potential" after he's drafted.
Surely you guys mean you don't watch or follow professional basketball...not that you don't care if our players go on to succeed? Just clarifying.
I assume you mean the former because it wouldnt make any sense otherwise.
Yes, if there is one thing Cal simply has to do better, it's recruiting.....This is soooooo painfully true and it's what HAS TO STOP in future recruiting.
Way to take an entirely laid out argument about devaluing traditional basketball fundamentals over length and athleticism and how that has really been a detriment to the program and cut out one line to take it out of context.Yes, if there is one thing Cal simply has to do better, it's recruiting.....
I understand context, and here it's unimportant. He gets the top recruiting class every year. He has a certain philosophy about the way to recruit, the kinds of players he likes to recruit. That philosophy has led directly to winning nearly 85% of his games. Not to mention going 22-4 in the NCAAT, getting to 4 final fours in 5 years - you know the list. There is no contextual consideration which goes in the other direction. If he goes less athletic and more skill, you give up something, and since there's very little room to go anywhere but down, my guess is the results would be less. Which would lead to much carping about not being athletic enough.Way to take an entirely laid out argument about devaluing traditional basketball fundamentals over length and athleticism and how that has really been a detriment to the program and cut out one line to take it out of context.
I understand context, and here it's unimportant. He gets the top recruiting class every year. He has a certain philosophy about the way to recruit, the kinds of players he likes to recruit. That philosophy has led directly to winning nearly 85% of his games. Not to mention going 22-4 in the NCAAT, getting to 4 final fours in 5 years - you know the list. There is no contextual consideration which goes in the other direction. If he goes less athletic and more skill, you give up something, and since there's very little room to go anywhere but down, my guess is the results would be less. Which would lead to much carping about not being athletic enough.
I think any kind of complaining about coaching in the midst of this kind of run is questionable - but reasonable minds can differ. I do think it's kind of crazy to complain about recruiting......
Fair enough, thanks for the civil exchange....I appreciate your very reasonable argument and explanation of your thoughts on the issue....but we are going to have to agree to disagree. Not making the NCAA is NEVER acceptable to me at UK. And it's happened once under Cal and although I think this years team is going to make the tourney it is not all that unlikely we fall apart in conference play and miss the tournament again. That's where the line is for me personally. And IF that happens it would be because in both cases we had ZERO post scoring on those teams and Cal's offense doesn't work well unless there is a superior post scorer which is a basketball skill issue. But I respect your viewpoint and understand we simply disagree on this issue.
THE NBA DRAFTS ON POTENTIAL
Being a better player now doesn't mean a player has more potential. Why is it so hard for you to comprehend?
I can offer the Poythress dribbling question. He has the WORST hand eye coordination of any big time athlete I've ever seen . He can barely make a one handed pass , it's almost always a two handed chest pass ( which I appreciate) . I'd be curious to know if there has ever been a non- center at UK with less assists per minute played . So there is no fix to his dribbling problems . Kenny Walker was much the same way but he was a WARRIOR .Untouchable, you bring up a very interesting post of the ones I have read here. We can debate who should play, who shouldn't etc. But, you are hitting upon something that does seem interesting. Yes, Young was bad at passing and over the season seemed to do the same thing over and over which was throw a weak pass from the baseline out to the top of the key where it would get picked off for a fast break for the other team. It happened time and time again and never really changed. I have seen Murray do it this year, although I wouldn't say he is at the James Young level or that the passes are weak. But, same type of thing which I am waiting to see it corrected (and it hasn't). How hard is it to get Briscoe to put more of an arc on his free throws, his fundamentals stink? Heck, I wouldn't mind him missing them if they even had a chance but the straight line he shoots them almost always hit the back of the rim and have no chance. What is equally weird, is guys like me, I mean not a basketball player can hit them with more frequency. Poy loses the ball on the dribble and that also has been a career issue that one wonders why it hasn't either been corrected by now. What about Lee, how hard is it to teach a pump fake or an up and under move? What about just ONE move for him?
My guess is we want players to be something they are not or that there are many aspects to the game where the expectation is the player will learn it on their own. But, fundamentals do seem like they don't change and it makes no sense.