Wolfgang said he was talking about the 3 musicians. I don’t know., just restating what he said.
But, may want to check the religious history of Poland if you think that’s a non sequitur.
Others deserving a mention but not the greatest:
Jimi Hendrix Experience
Foo Fighters
Red Hot Chili Peppers
Prince and the Revolution
Green Day
I'll go with Skynyrd as the quintessential American rock band with DLR era Van Halen as #2.
"The whole damn band was white, except for Jimi", laugh every time that line is said.Drummer and bassist for Jimi Hendrix were British.
Jimi Hendrix plus two British nobodies. The only member that counts was Merican.Drummer and bassist for Jimi Hendrix were British.
Jimi Hendrix plus two British nobodies. The only member that counts was Merican.
All of this is accurate. Their idol was Elvis, as he was in a different stratosphere from everybody…he was the Beatles before the Beatles. But in terms of their actual musical influences, I’d say they borrowed from Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Elvis, the Everly Brothers, but more than anything, Buddy Holly and the Crickets. They even named their band after the Crickets.When I first heard how John and Paul were influenced by Buddy Holly I put on Please Please Me and sure enough, he’s all over that album.
I’ve got a dozen playlists and the 50’s to early 60’s gets some serious play.
-The Beatles are basically untouchable, musically. There’s never been anybody that has approached their total body of work, and what’s funny is that they were basically the first modern rock ‘n’ roll band.
Totally agree. The Beatles were great (although not one of my top 10). Wrote a lot of memorable songs, pioneered recording techniques (not all of them good, imo). Their total body of work encompassed, what, 7 years. Many artists have maintained a high artistic level 20+ years or more. They drew from a wide range of influences and sang together really, really well.All 3 of these statements are highly debatable, and that isn't meant to discredit what they accomplished, and their historical influence to music.
Untouchable, musically....not even sure what this is supposed to mean.
Total body of work....of the statements, this one is probably 99.9% false.
Bill Haley and the Comets are generally considered the first "rock and roll" band.
I didn’t claim that they invented rock-and-roll. Ike Turner did that. But as far as a “modern” rock band, the Beatles were the first. Bill Haley and the Comets were rock, but they weren’t producing the type of transcrendent music the Beatles were. Elvis did a few songs that were iconic, but outside of him, a few from Chuck Berry, and some from Little Richard, rock didn’t become transcendent until the Beatles hit.Ike Turner always claimed his Rocket 88 song that predates Rock Around the Clock was the first RnR song. It's a good rocking song, I'll give him that.
He definitely was one of the first and most influential, but Elvis popularized it. Then, the Beatles took it to another level.Chuck Berry is the original king of rock n roll.
Totally agree. The Beatles were great (although not one of my top 10). Wrote a lot of memorable songs, pioneered recording techniques (not all of them good, imo). Their total body of work encompassed, what, 7 years. Many artists have maintained a high artistic level 20+ years or more. They drew from a wide range of influences and sang together really, really well.
I downgrade them for their lack of live performances, though. A lot of things can be done in the studio but can you make it work live on stage is a whole other set of obstacles. They gave up playing live halfway through their career. Still immensely influential and wrote several songs that will be played 50 years from now.
Chuck Berry is the original king of rock n roll.
Canned Heat agrees - Rocking With The King.No, that would be Little Richard.
Love Canned Heat!Canned Heat agrees - Rocking With The King.