If by “5*” you mean 5-star freshmen, then I definitely disagree with that. I think making freshmen the center piece of your team is a recipe for failure, not championships. It was extremely difficult, and unwise in my opinion, to purposely rely on freshman a decade ago. In the age of the transfer portal and NIL I think it’s a fool’s errand. If you do it when you have other options – like a top program always has – then I think it’s a marketing or ego thing, because I don’t think it’s about winning CBB games.
I might be wrongly assuming what you meant, because it is possible to have players that were listed as five-star recruits that are around for a number of years, even a senior season (e.g., Josiah James at TN). But by that 2nd or 3rd college year, how you were ranked by a recruiting service coming out of high school is irrelevant and probably doesn’t correlate strongly with who is the centerpiece of a championship team. By that time, you’re either a good productive CBB player, a bench piece or a practice player regardless of how you were ranked as a high school recruit.
I think a freshman (5* or otherwise) probably shouldn’t be more than a 4th or 5th offensive option if your team expects to seriously compete for a title most years. But I actually think OAD 5-star freshmen are completely unnecessary, if not harmful, to blue-blood title contending CBB programs.