Exactly. Plus the refs wanted out alive.Wow overturned. I think the ACC did that to keep Miami in the playoff chase for real.
ExactlyReally a close call. From one angle it looked like VT came down with the ball. From another it appeared that the ball was jarred loose by a VT player's leg before the receiver had complete control. Wild ending. Could have gone either way. I don't see how you overturn that call when it was not clearly one or the other.
VT receiver had the ball, went to the ground and the player for Miami out of bounds hit it out of his hand. That is a secondary play on the ball and he’s not in bounds, the TD should stand.You call it a TD you need clear evidence. Not sure if they had that.
Seems like a "Well, we want a couple of teams in the playoffs, screw VT" kind of move.
It's probably incomplete. But if you call it a TD on the field, you basically just yanked a win away from a team on a "maybe" Crap move imo.
VT receiver had the ball, went to the ground and the player for Miami out of bounds hit it out of his hand. That is a secondary play on the ball and he’s not in bounds, the TD should stand.
He initially grabbed the ball with 2 hands, pulled it toward his body and secured it. It wasn’t until he was on the ground that it started moving like that. These control issues are dumb. That’s a catch. Even if you disagree there was not enough evidence to overturn the on field call, we both got screwed.I completely disagree
The back camera shows as he is landing, the ball is under his forearm, he is trying to trap it against his body, so he never had control, then the Miami player pokes it out. Definitely an incomplete pass.
Really a close call. From one angle it looked like VT came down with the ball. From another it appeared that the ball was jarred loose by a VT player's leg before the receiver had complete control. Wild ending. Could have gone either way. I don't see how you overturn that call when it was not clearly one or the other.