"Im" would imply it's collapsed inward. Since they vacated may I should've used Explosion.Originally posted by Chump Change X:
Implosion? Funniest thing I've read all week?Originally posted by mrschwump:
I've said it for a week....this is unprecedented during a non-probation time. Even with a HC change you won't see classes collapse like this one has. It'll be really interesting to hear Stoops comments on this implosion.Originally posted by AVCat:
What is going on? It would be good for the coach or someone in the know to explain what's happening. The ONLY time I have seen players abandon ship like this was when we were going on probation. 2 days before signing day. What a joke
At this point, you aren't dealing with a kid you can't trust, regardless of whether he has been open about his commitment. Think about it for a minute. Haven't you had enough demonstration of what can happen even when you have an open verbal?Originally posted by C1180:
The old silent verbal. That sure is an Oxymoron to beat all. I assume by silent verbal that you are speaking of a player telling the coaching staff that they are coming to UK but that they do not want it known or made public before signing day. It has been my experience that this seldom happens. I know if I was a coach I would be very reluctant to hold a spot for some kid that made a silent verbal and a coaching staff would have absolutely no reason to honor any commitment that was not made public,Originally posted by southindycat:
Not saying it will happen, but if we finish strong on signings of silent verbals, I will laugh loud and long. Our staff might be a little surly, playing some things close to the vest, whether out of caution, or spite.
I can not think of even one good reason for silent as you say verbals.
Ohh, I am sorry... I suppose I was operating under the mistaken belief that this was a message board where we were supposed to discuss Kentucky football, and I was in fact discussing Kentucky football. I can't believe I made such a mistake and put you in such a terrible position to have to read my off topic posts.Originally posted by Levibooty:
Well do everybody a favor and stop your sniveling until after the class is signed, the entire class,Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Yes, I do know that. However, if I am not mistaken, Rivals only actually counts the first 20 in that process. So, the number has a limit. So, yes, the top 20 in 2012 was not as strong as this year's top 15. Largely because Stoops has brought in 2 four star guys compared to Joker's none that year.Originally posted by BigSexyCat:
Hmm, you do know that rivals rankings are also based on the number of recruits in addition to the quality. In 2012 UK had 26 recruits but yet they finished 63rd in the nation NOT 50th. We only have commits thus far from 15 players and are still ranked 49th. That should tell you all you need to know about the quality of player Stoops and company is recruiting.
I was not talking about 2012... I was referring to 2010 when Joker was ranked 50th in the nation in recruiting. The next two years were 63rd and 62nd. No, we aren't in the 60s, but we're much closer to the 60s than we were 29th in Stoops' first year or 17th last year. Fact of the matter is that this is a HUGE step back. And once again, why does it matter what we got in the Joker years? Most of those kids are heading towards the door. What I am worried about is the fact that almost every other SEC team has classes ranked in the top 31. The only three that don't are UK, Vandy, and Florida. I know it can change, but if this class remains pretty close to where it is at then we are hurting ourselves in the long run. You see, UK cannot afford to have bad years recruiting. We are already lacking in talent, so we need to have solid years every year. We need to be at least top 25-30 with an occasional top 15-20. Hopefully we finish out strong, but the past week has been discouraging.
then at least you will know what you're sniveling about at that point.
Yet jokers classes where ranked in the 50s and 60s with 20-25 commits! We have 15 and still arent out of the top 50! Any 5 recruitswould put us at 35!Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
You may not want to put this class on Joker level, but the fact of the matter is that Joker was recruiting around 50th in the nation. Guess where we are? 49th. In 2011 Joker's class was only ranked 62nd, but that class only had 2 guys that were 2 stars. The rest were 3 or 4 stars. In 2012 he only had 4 guys that were 2 stars, and one of them was a kicker. It is obviously debatable on whether his 3 stars were as good or better than the ones we are currently bringing in, but the fact of the matter is still that we were extremely close in terms of rankings that he was.
Also... why does it even matter how good Joker's recruits were? We don't need to compare then to now unless we're worried about the Joker recruits still on the roster. We need to compare what our class is like compared to the rest of the SEC, and when we look at that we are in dire straits. We're some odd 20 ranking spots below the next closest SEC team. So, unless we're only looking to compete with Vandy (and UF right now) then this recruiting is not going to cut it. Not to mention our biggest rival is 19 recruiting spots ahead of us. We don't have to be number 1 in the league in recruiting, but the idea is to at least keep our talent level pretty close to the rest, and I don't think we've done that this year.
Also, we're losing guys like Stowbridge, who had offers from almost every big name college in the country. Who are we going to replace them with? Josh Allen who has an offer from from basically nobody else...? Maybe he comes in and tears up the place, but a lot of people put a lot of weight into who has offered these kids, and his offer sheet isn't encouraging. I know there are a few guys on the board we're still going after, but the problem is that we're replacing decommits with guys that are kind of unknown possible diamond in the rough players. We should be finishing out the class and filling spots, but instead we're hoping to get a few more targets and then having to replace the defectors. I don't think we can spin the positively no matter what we do.
Except one, not all really good players do get found (Cobb comes to mind as does Travathan). I agree that most really good players probably do but if you watched Super Bowl Sunday yesterday you saw discussions around a lot of really good players who did not get found by power 5 conference schools.Originally posted by TBCat:
Understood but really good players get found. Watch the video this is not a diamond in the rough type of recruit. On video he looks like a low 2 star. He might turn out better than expected, Travathan did, but this is not the kind of recruit to get hyped over. He's a really good project but he is a project. Let's understand what he actually is and not do what we did under Joker which is over hype every 2 star that picked us over a MAC school.
Yea, its hard to trust 'under the radar' a lot of times but Allen at least has legitimate size and the stats to back it up against good competition.Originally posted by subsonic66:
Yet jokers classes where ranked in the 50s and 60s with 20-25 commits! We have 15 and still arent out of the top 50! Any 5 recruitswould put us at 35!Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
You may not want to put this class on Joker level, but the fact of the matter is that Joker was recruiting around 50th in the nation. Guess where we are? 49th. In 2011 Joker's class was only ranked 62nd, but that class only had 2 guys that were 2 stars. The rest were 3 or 4 stars. In 2012 he only had 4 guys that were 2 stars, and one of them was a kicker. It is obviously debatable on whether his 3 stars were as good or better than the ones we are currently bringing in, but the fact of the matter is still that we were extremely close in terms of rankings that he was.
Also... why does it even matter how good Joker's recruits were? We don't need to compare then to now unless we're worried about the Joker recruits still on the roster. We need to compare what our class is like compared to the rest of the SEC, and when we look at that we are in dire straits. We're some odd 20 ranking spots below the next closest SEC team. So, unless we're only looking to compete with Vandy (and UF right now) then this recruiting is not going to cut it. Not to mention our biggest rival is 19 recruiting spots ahead of us. We don't have to be number 1 in the league in recruiting, but the idea is to at least keep our talent level pretty close to the rest, and I don't think we've done that this year.
Also, we're losing guys like Stowbridge, who had offers from almost every big name college in the country. Who are we going to replace them with? Josh Allen who has an offer from from basically nobody else...? Maybe he comes in and tears up the place, but a lot of people put a lot of weight into who has offered these kids, and his offer sheet isn't encouraging. I know there are a few guys on the board we're still going after, but the problem is that we're replacing decommits with guys that are kind of unknown possible diamond in the rough players. We should be finishing out the class and filling spots, but instead we're hoping to get a few more targets and then having to replace the defectors. I don't think we can spin the positively no matter what we do.
Also to.the fellow talking about Allens rankings, he was a WR in Alabama, switched positions to play DE. This could cause him to get overlooked! Btw AJ Stamps was a 2*
Its not just UK having issues with this, we have had 3 in the last week, very likely to have 3 more by the end of Wed and and have a couple more who are making their "final decision on Wed. On top of all that, the top guy on our board reportly gave UCLA a silent over the weekend. So UK isn't the only place going through this, its all over the SEC. SC has lost about 6, UT has lost 3-4, Bama has lost 3, OM has lost 3-4 kids and might lose another. So it just isn't happening to UK. Our class has gone from number 3 and if all things go against us Wed will likely be hard pressed to be in top 20.Originally posted by mrschwump:
Never ending, just brutal.
Don't jump on your high horse just yet. Levi has a point and a damn good one. You aren't just having an honest discussion. You have an agenda to make this less than ideal situation out to be worse than it really is. You are picking and choosing the info and stats that show only the negative pieces of this class. What you are doing is called spinning. Why do you want us to think things are worse than they really are?Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Ohh, I am sorry... I suppose I was operating under the mistaken belief that this was a message board where we were supposed to discuss Kentucky football, and I was in fact discussing Kentucky football. I can't believe I made such a mistake and put you in such a terrible position to have to read my off topic posts.Originally posted by Levibooty:
Well do everybody a favor and stop your sniveling until after the class is signed, the entire class,Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Yes, I do know that. However, if I am not mistaken, Rivals only actually counts the first 20 in that process. So, the number has a limit. So, yes, the top 20 in 2012 was not as strong as this year's top 15. Largely because Stoops has brought in 2 four star guys compared to Joker's none that year.Originally posted by BigSexyCat:
Hmm, you do know that rivals rankings are also based on the number of recruits in addition to the quality. In 2012 UK had 26 recruits but yet they finished 63rd in the nation NOT 50th. We only have commits thus far from 15 players and are still ranked 49th. That should tell you all you need to know about the quality of player Stoops and company is recruiting.
I was not talking about 2012... I was referring to 2010 when Joker was ranked 50th in the nation in recruiting. The next two years were 63rd and 62nd. No, we aren't in the 60s, but we're much closer to the 60s than we were 29th in Stoops' first year or 17th last year. Fact of the matter is that this is a HUGE step back. And once again, why does it matter what we got in the Joker years? Most of those kids are heading towards the door. What I am worried about is the fact that almost every other SEC team has classes ranked in the top 31. The only three that don't are UK, Vandy, and Florida. I know it can change, but if this class remains pretty close to where it is at then we are hurting ourselves in the long run. You see, UK cannot afford to have bad years recruiting. We are already lacking in talent, so we need to have solid years every year. We need to be at least top 25-30 with an occasional top 15-20. Hopefully we finish out strong, but the past week has been discouraging.
then at least you will know what you're sniveling about at that point.
I've been a guy that tries to stay positive for a long time. I've bought into the stuff where we've all said, "I trust Coach fill in the blank." I have seen everyone here try to spin the "diamonds in the rough." Or more recently we've had people trying to spin the losses of these players as not a big deal. Some because we've replaced them with better players (those diamonds in the rough). Remember when Luke Heirs decomimtted? People, myself included, just wrote it off as being because he wasn't needed because Drake Jackson was coming in in 2016, and many said that we'd need scholarships at the end for actual needed positions so we decided to pull Heirs' scholarship (among other reasons). Now, we're at a late point in the season where it doesn't look like we will get to a full class. Another guy like Heirs to fill up a spot and add depth certainly wouldn't hurt.Originally posted by BigBluePhantom:
Don't jump on your high horse just yet. Levi has a point and a damn good one. You aren't just having an honest discussion. You have an agenda to make this less than ideal situation out to be worse than it really is. You are picking and choosing the info and stats that show only the negative pieces of this class. What you are doing is called spinning. Why do you want us to think things are worse than they really are?Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Ohh, I am sorry... I suppose I was operating under the mistaken belief that this was a message board where we were supposed to discuss Kentucky football, and I was in fact discussing Kentucky football. I can't believe I made such a mistake and put you in such a terrible position to have to read my off topic posts.Originally posted by Levibooty:
Well do everybody a favor and stop your sniveling until after the class is signed, the entire class,Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Yes, I do know that. However, if I am not mistaken, Rivals only actually counts the first 20 in that process. So, the number has a limit. So, yes, the top 20 in 2012 was not as strong as this year's top 15. Largely because Stoops has brought in 2 four star guys compared to Joker's none that year.Originally posted by BigSexyCat:
Hmm, you do know that rivals rankings are also based on the number of recruits in addition to the quality. In 2012 UK had 26 recruits but yet they finished 63rd in the nation NOT 50th. We only have commits thus far from 15 players and are still ranked 49th. That should tell you all you need to know about the quality of player Stoops and company is recruiting.
I was not talking about 2012... I was referring to 2010 when Joker was ranked 50th in the nation in recruiting. The next two years were 63rd and 62nd. No, we aren't in the 60s, but we're much closer to the 60s than we were 29th in Stoops' first year or 17th last year. Fact of the matter is that this is a HUGE step back. And once again, why does it matter what we got in the Joker years? Most of those kids are heading towards the door. What I am worried about is the fact that almost every other SEC team has classes ranked in the top 31. The only three that don't are UK, Vandy, and Florida. I know it can change, but if this class remains pretty close to where it is at then we are hurting ourselves in the long run. You see, UK cannot afford to have bad years recruiting. We are already lacking in talent, so we need to have solid years every year. We need to be at least top 25-30 with an occasional top 15-20. Hopefully we finish out strong, but the past week has been discouraging.
then at least you will know what you're sniveling about at that point.
You want to compare Stoops' worst class with Joker's best class. Why do you ignore that most of Joker's classes were rated much lower than even this incomplete class. Yeah, it is incomplete and you know it. Why do you speak of this class like it can't improve in the rankings? It most likely will. You state that we are losing recruits that have offers by the top programs in the country yet you fail to understand that since we are not a top program that it only makes sense for most of these guys to flip when offered. At least we are being considered by recruits of this caliber. Finally, when nearly everybody else points out these obvious flaws in your arguments, you say that we shouldn't be comparing this class to Joker's classes. Hello! it is you and the other negative nancies who keep making the Joker reference in the first place.
So yeah, this is a message board and you can post whatever you want. However, when you get on here and say a bunch of ridiculous crap that is false or one sided, don't get your panties in a wad when you get called out on it.
A little melodramatic there aren't you?Originally posted by gobigblue812:
I can't believe Joker's classes were as good as this one. What is Stoops thinking? How can we offer a guy that is a 1-AA commit? The sky is falling. I can't believe NSD has come and gone already. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
Oh, wait, NSD isn't here yet and we are only ranked 50th because we've only got 15 guys so far. Oh, and wait, the guys we are losing are all going to power 5 schools and some of them are powerhouse schools.
If you want to recruit with the big boys, then you are going to lose some to the big boys. If you like to keep all of your commits because most of them aren't wanted by power 5 schools then you need to ask for Joker to come back.
This class will rank from the mid to low 30s after NSD.
Thats fair. I do think you are taking the last few days a little hard. Here is why. This class is really not much worse than the last two. It is the fact that we only have 15 that is dragging us down if the rankings. Depth is a major concern, particuarly at a few defensive spots. It would be ideal if we could sign 25 top prospects. However, I am ok if we only sign 20 this year for two reasons. First, I think we will win 6 or 7 next year which will allow us to attract a little better recruit for 2016. It should also help us to hang on to some of the early signees we lost this year. Second, the in-state class for 2016 is predicted to be much stronger than it has been the last few years. The key is to perform on the field and have a winning season with a bowl game. If that happens, I could see this staff pulling in 30 good recruits hopefully averaging around 3.75 stars. Thats is 15+ four stars and 1 or 2 five stars.Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
I've been a guy that tries to stay positive for a long time. I've bought into the stuff where we've all said, "I trust Coach fill in the blank." I have seen everyone here try to spin the "diamonds in the rough." Or more recently we've had people trying to spin the losses of these players as not a big deal. Some because we've replaced them with better players (those diamonds in the rough). Remember when Luke Heirs decomimtted? People, myself included, just wrote it off as being because he wasn't needed because Drake Jackson was coming in in 2016, and many said that we'd need scholarships at the end for actual needed positions so we decided to pull Heirs' scholarship (among other reasons). Now, we're at a late point in the season where it doesn't look like we will get to a full class. Another guy like Heirs to fill up a spot and add depth certainly wouldn't hurt.Originally posted by BigBluePhantom:
Don't jump on your high horse just yet. Levi has a point and a damn good one. You aren't just having an honest discussion. You have an agenda to make this less than ideal situation out to be worse than it really is. You are picking and choosing the info and stats that show only the negative pieces of this class. What you are doing is called spinning. Why do you want us to think things are worse than they really are?Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Ohh, I am sorry... I suppose I was operating under the mistaken belief that this was a message board where we were supposed to discuss Kentucky football, and I was in fact discussing Kentucky football. I can't believe I made such a mistake and put you in such a terrible position to have to read my off topic posts.Originally posted by Levibooty:
Well do everybody a favor and stop your sniveling until after the class is signed, the entire class,Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
Yes, I do know that. However, if I am not mistaken, Rivals only actually counts the first 20 in that process. So, the number has a limit. So, yes, the top 20 in 2012 was not as strong as this year's top 15. Largely because Stoops has brought in 2 four star guys compared to Joker's none that year.Originally posted by BigSexyCat:
Hmm, you do know that rivals rankings are also based on the number of recruits in addition to the quality. In 2012 UK had 26 recruits but yet they finished 63rd in the nation NOT 50th. We only have commits thus far from 15 players and are still ranked 49th. That should tell you all you need to know about the quality of player Stoops and company is recruiting.
I was not talking about 2012... I was referring to 2010 when Joker was ranked 50th in the nation in recruiting. The next two years were 63rd and 62nd. No, we aren't in the 60s, but we're much closer to the 60s than we were 29th in Stoops' first year or 17th last year. Fact of the matter is that this is a HUGE step back. And once again, why does it matter what we got in the Joker years? Most of those kids are heading towards the door. What I am worried about is the fact that almost every other SEC team has classes ranked in the top 31. The only three that don't are UK, Vandy, and Florida. I know it can change, but if this class remains pretty close to where it is at then we are hurting ourselves in the long run. You see, UK cannot afford to have bad years recruiting. We are already lacking in talent, so we need to have solid years every year. We need to be at least top 25-30 with an occasional top 15-20. Hopefully we finish out strong, but the past week has been discouraging.
then at least you will know what you're sniveling about at that point.
You want to compare Stoops' worst class with Joker's best class. Why do you ignore that most of Joker's classes were rated much lower than even this incomplete class. Yeah, it is incomplete and you know it. Why do you speak of this class like it can't improve in the rankings? It most likely will. You state that we are losing recruits that have offers by the top programs in the country yet you fail to understand that since we are not a top program that it only makes sense for most of these guys to flip when offered. At least we are being considered by recruits of this caliber. Finally, when nearly everybody else points out these obvious flaws in your arguments, you say that we shouldn't be comparing this class to Joker's classes. Hello! it is you and the other negative nancies who keep making the Joker reference in the first place.
So yeah, this is a message board and you can post whatever you want. However, when you get on here and say a bunch of ridiculous crap that is false or one sided, don't get your panties in a wad when you get called out on it.
I have no agenda. I see that this class has quality, but we are in the SEC. We need depth and quality in order to compete week in and week out. We have some quality right now on our roster, but what's our problem? Depth. Remember how everyone kept using the excuse that our guys were just exhausted from not having a bye week during our 5 game losing streak? Adding a class of 15 is not going to help that, especially if any number of them redshirt.
In terms of me saying anything false or one-sided. I don't think that is true at all. I cited Joker's first class that was ranked 50th, which was actually Joker's worst class by star ratings. Then I mentioned his other two classes, which were ranked in the 60s and were not littered with 2 star guys like some people would have you believe. I actually mentioned it because a lot of people were pointing out that Joker had terrible classes. They certainly weren't outstanding, but if you go by recruiting rankings right now (which is all we can go by because we aren't finished yet) then this class' ranking is closer to Joker's average of 58 in his 3 years than we are to Stoops' first two classes. If I had my pick... I'd much rather be closer to 29 than I would be Joker's 62/63/50 rankings.
Again... all I worry about is Kentucky and how this class might effect us in the future. I have no agenda. I am just discussing the football team that I love and follow wholeheartedly and expressing my concerns for an extremely important aspect of their success. I am not worried about what Joker did, but only about how UK compares to the teams it has to face in the future, mostly the SEC teams. I fully believe that we have to close a pretty big talent gap. In fact, I think that is obvious. To close that SEC talent gap we will need quality and depth. This class might have the quality, but the depth is not quite there, and we aren't going in the right direction to get there just two days shy of NSD.
I am sorry if I come off as trying to depress everyone. That isn't my intention. However, I also don't think we need to just blindly believe that everything is going to be sunshine and lollipops. The Harris decision and a lack of really good news over the past two months, not to mention the fact that we went 0-6 to end the season, have left me a little jaded. I'm usually quite the optimist, but it can be hard to take. I also feel that I am willing to discuss UK football with anyone. I felt that Levi, rather than discuss it with me just wanted to be insulting and rude.
I understand that. We aren't a great historic football team, but as I said, I think we have to continue to keep the talent gap as close as possible. I think at one point I said we need to be around the 20-30 range and occasionally jump into the 15-20 range. Getting above the 30s, really mostly above 35, can be really detrimental to us because that puts us really far behind the rest of the SEC. I don't expect us to get to the SEC title game or the NCAA title game... I just expect us to compete better than we have in recent years. I expect us to get back to bowl games and have some good winning seasons.Originally posted by jarheadky:
Problem is your not really being realistic, we have been historically bad for a long long time that doesn't change over 2 1/2 recruiting cycles and two seasons. We signed ten 4 star recruits last year and were able to hold on to that class in large part due to the efforts of Drew Barker who helped recruit a lot of those kids for us and made sure the class stayed together. Harris could have done this but chose not to, he could have committed early and got other kids to come and helped hold the class together but he didn't for that reason I don't believe he ever intended to sign with UK. We are not the only school this is happening to a fact that you don't seem to realize or conveniently seem to leave out of all your post. Again we will have a better season next year after we go to a bowl game next years class could be the best ever. Also you never no what will happen on NSD a lot of kids are still uncommitted we could still end up mid to low thirties and I'm fine with that. No one said we had to win the SEC east next year or even the year after that as long as were making progress and getting better then the classes will continue to get better but this isn't gonna be a 4 or 5 year project and we are gonna be in the national title game that just being really unrealistic.
A little melodramatic there aren't you?Originally posted by gobigblue812:
I can't believe Joker's classes were as good as this one. What is Stoops thinking? How can we offer a guy that is a 1-AA commit? The sky is falling. I can't believe NSD has come and gone already. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
Oh, wait, NSD isn't here yet and we are only ranked 50th because we've only got 15 guys so far. Oh, and wait, the guys we are losing are all going to power 5 schools and some of them are powerhouse schools.
If you want to recruit with the big boys, then you are going to lose some to the big boys. If you like to keep all of your commits because most of them aren't wanted by power 5 schools then you need to ask for Joker to come back.
This class will rank from the mid to low 30s after NSD.
I think you are right. This is a high quality class, but I really do think that depth is important. I would be okay with a very solid 20, but I want to see us finish this class quite strongly and not just find diamond in the rough prospects to fill up spots. Again, I think in a class with 23-24 prospects then having Allen would be outstanding. However, in a class of just 15-20 he is a bit more risky. So, I am really hoping that we will finish extremely strong. Tomorrow should help to spring board us towards some better things, but hopefully we can keep what is in the fold and then add about 4 more strong guys.Originally posted by BigBluePhantom:
Thats fair. I do think you are taking the last few days a little hard. Here is why. This class is really not much worse than the last two. It is the fact that we only have 15 that is dragging us down if the rankings. Depth is a major concern, particuarly at a few defensive spots. It would be ideal if we could sign 25 top prospects. However, I am ok if we only sign 20 this year for two reasons. First, I think we will win 6 or 7 next year which will allow us to attract a little better recruit for 2016. It should also help us to hang on to some of the early signees we lost this year. Second, the in-state class for 2016 is predicted to be much stronger than it has been the last few years. The key is to perform on the field and have a winning season with a bowl game. If that happens, I could see this staff pulling in 30 good recruits hopefully averaging around 3.75 stars. Thats is 15+ four stars and 1 or 2 five stars.
This recruiting period has followed the same path as the season did. Both started out with a bang and then fizzled out. The perception is alarming but the reality is that the season actually exceeded most people's predictions going in. Likewise, when NSD is a wrap in two days, you will be able to step back and look at this class. The final product, coupled with the transfers we have coming, is going to be very similar to what was considered a spectacular class last year.
It blows my mind how many people obsess about class rankings as if that is the main gauge of Stoops as a coach. There is a lot more to it. You can tell the novices by how much they obsess over class rankings, which are like judging a new car by how much it costs. A kid's offer sheet is more enlightening than his rating, but even that does not tell us whether he will go to class and stay healthy. The best teams have coaches who bring in sharp, reliable kids with skills and put them in positions to win. Stoops is taking a bunch of crap now because a handful of teenagers didn't keep their word. This is a sign of the times. We will be fine, and Stoops' critics will come out looking like novices.Originally posted by CharlestownCat:
Player development matters more than class rankings, and this coaching staff has proven that they develop players. We don't need a Top 25 class, or be in the upper 1/3 of the SEC in order to win here. If the staff continues to perform like it has, I have absolutely no worries. I think we win 9-10 games next year, and that's when recruiting will really pick up.
This post was edited on 2/2 10:24 PM by CharlestownCat
We have the talent to get to a bowl game, but with the current format that isn't a huge improvement. What we really need is the talent to compete. The talent that keeps us from getting blown out against Tennessee. The talent that keeps us in games against almost all SEC teams. I know that players can come from anywhere (Cobb was actually a 3 star recruit, but I get your point), but what teams are having the most success? Teams that are filling up with 3 star guys or teams that are hauling in 4 and 5 star talent? Yes, the NFL finds the cream of the crop, but you know who has produced the most active NFL players? USC (West), Florida, Georgia, Miami, FSU, LSU. Teams that have had amazing recruiting throughout the years. Wisconsin had the most players in this year's super bowl. Where are they ranked in recruiting most years? Top 25. Sure, the meat and potatoes are three star guys, but we can't live off diamond in the rough, under the radar players if we want to be really competitive in this league.Originally posted by jarheadky:
Actually we have 17 recruits the two transfers from Nebraska count against our 25 player limit and are not factored into the final ranking of the class. I do understand some of what you are saying but a lot of this is premature as I believe we already have the talent be in a bowl game next year actually we were a dropped interception and a blind referee from being 7-5 this year. Something to keep in mind is class and player star rankings are not always indicative of what you are gonna have on campus. Randle Cobb was a 2 star and a lot of the NFL is made up of former 3 star recruits, who were late bloomers or just weren't developed by their coaches or even were playing out of position in high school. A lot of what sets programs apart from us right now is the fact that they have the depth to red shirt a great majority of their classes if they need to, and this is huge when it comes to developing players.