UK doesn't have to cherry pick. We're ahead of KU in any era.The image posted was in response to a question why KU fans want to start the series win-loss count at 1984.
There was an ESPN article yesterday that puts KU ahead of Kentucky. Found it:
1.Duke Blue Devils (40 wins) The Blue Devils are 32-6 this century as a top seed, but just 8-7 as a No. 2 (four times), 3 (2003 and 2014), or 6 (2007).
National titles: 2001, 2010, 2015
2. Michigan State Spartans (40 wins) Tom Izzo has won 40 times since 2000 with an average seed position of 5.2.
National title: 2000
3. Kansas Jayhawks (39 wins)
National title: 2008
When you're in a March Madness "drought" yet you're still effectively tied with the national leaders for tournament wins since 2000, life is, all things being equal, pretty good. Kansas hasn't been to the second weekend of the tournament since 2013, but we've seen stretches like this before from every program at the top of this list: Michigan State was absent from the Sweet 16 in 2006 and 2007, and the same was true of Duke in 2007 and 2008. KU shall return, too. [H]asn't ...been seeded as low as No. 5 one time since 2001.
4. North Carolina Tarheels (36 wins) As head coach at UNC, Williams is 4-1 in Final Four and national title games.
National titles: 2005, 2009
5. Kentucky Wildcats (36 wins) Since Calipari took the helm in 2009-10, Kentucky has won 22 tournament games.
National title: 2012
ETC.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...-headline-century-ncaa-tournament-leaderboard
Yes.So you are saying that there is a chance?
**Yeah, none of this - let's make it relevant to today.
Let's relish W's over KU back in the '60's & '70's when they were at their lowest!! LMAO!!!
You say "whatever it takes to make our team look better"...well, that's exactly what you're doing by including the games from before any of us practically was following basketball!!! Heck, probably before most of us were even 9-10 years old!!! (i.e., I'd've been 10 in '84).
Since '84, KU's 5-6. Not exactly OVERWHELMINGLY in UK's favor.
In those 11.....= KU 3-0 at Lawrence, tied up 1-1 in Lexington & UK 5-1 at neutral sites
And despite leading 6-5 over that time, KU's actually OUTSCORED UK 827-799 in those 11 gms.
I'm not denying that the '60s & '70s games didn't happen....they did.
But you're not going to be playing a Kansas team from that era when almost half the time they weren't even ranked & at least 2/3 - 3/4 of the time if they WERE ranked they were 15th or lower.
No, KU's typically a Top 10 or higher ranked team going on what? 20+ years now?
What's best about your stats and using '84 as the time frame. UK=3 national titles and KU=1.
Nice. Sacrifice your first championship In order to get rid of UK's other 4. I would do the same Kansas fan. I swear I would.Actually, it would be 3 to 2 over KU in championships, since 1984, not 3 to 1, but more importantly, it's 4 to 2 over KU since 1975, the birth-year of the 'modern tourney' (a bigger & MUCH more difficult tourney).
Final Fours since April 1984 are a different story, though. UK and KU are tied (8), plus UK had an additional FF in '84, so 9 total since April 1978. UNC has had 9 FFs since '84 and 11 since April 1978, and Duke's had 12 FFs since the mid-80s (plus their 1978 FF), so the recent-history FF order is Duke, UNC, UK, KU.
Actually, it would be 3 to 2 over KU in championships, since 1984, not 3 to 1, but more importantly, it's 4 to 2 over KU since 1975, the birth-year of the 'modern tourney' (a bigger & MUCH more difficult tourney).
Final Fours since April 1984 are a different story, though. UK and KU are tied (8), plus UK had an additional FF in '84, so 9 total since April 1978. UNC has had 9 FFs since '84 and 11 since April 1978, and Duke's had 12 FFs since the mid-80s (plus their 1978 FF), so the 35-year FF order is Duke, UNC, UK, KU.
Start from '84 because HOW MANY OF US WERE EVEN WATCHING before then?
I'd be willing to bet not many. Oh, the great memories of those '70s UK teams you all have. I mean yeah, of course, there's some older folks on here, but I'd be willing to bet that the majority are between 18 - 45....not say 55 & older.[/QUOTE
Start from '84 because HOW MANY OF US WERE EVEN WATCHING before then?
I'd be willing to bet not many. Oh, the great memories of those '70s UK teams you all have. I mean yeah, of course, there's some older folks on here, but I'd be willing to bet that the majority are between 18 - 45....not say 55 & older.
Okay, understandable point..but why not start in 1990 then instead of picking 1984, why not 1980? It seems you pick that time to include 2 wins from 85 and 89, which helps try and prove something. It just seems you're picking a favorable year to try and make the stats play in your favor; even though you still have a losing record.
So does that mean KU only has 2 national championships, bc who cares about something won in the 50s?
Picking random dates/times can always play into the choosers liking. Like I said lets just start at 1990. UK leads the head to head 6-3, also 3 national championships to 1.
There was an ESPN article yesterday that puts KU ahead of Kentucky. Found it:
1.Duke Blue Devils (40 wins) The Blue Devils are 32-6 this century as a top seed, but just 8-7 as a No. 2 (four times), 3 (2003 and 2014), or 6 (2007).
National titles: 2001, 2010, 2015
2. Michigan State Spartans (40 wins) Tom Izzo has won 40 times since 2000 with an average seed position of 5.2.
National title: 2000
3. Kansas Jayhawks (39 wins)
National title: 2008
When you're in a March Madness "drought" yet you're still effectively tied with the national leaders for tournament wins since 2000, life is, all things being equal, pretty good. Kansas hasn't been to the second weekend of the tournament since 2013, but we've seen stretches like this before from every program at the top of this list: Michigan State was absent from the Sweet 16 in 2006 and 2007, and the same was true of Duke in 2007 and 2008. KU shall return, too. [H]asn't ...been seeded as low as No. 5 one time since 2001.
4. North Carolina Tarheels (36 wins) As head coach at UNC, Williams is 4-1 in Final Four and national title games.
National titles: 2005, 2009
5. Kentucky Wildcats (36 wins) Since Calipari took the helm in 2009-10, Kentucky has won 22 tournament games.
National title: 2012
ETC.
.
I love it: Selective Time Frames yet again from a Kansas fan.
Let's see just a FEW things that Kentucky holds over Kansas (I can name more, if you like).
8>3
22>6
Less NCAA Infractions
More Final Fours
More all time wins
A higher all time winning percentage
A winning record in Phog Allen Fieldhouse
32 points (could have been worse)
Don't lose to mid-majors consistently in the NCAA Tournament
Kicked your ass in the first game we played you, and also in the last game we played you
Well, maybe, you folks just ran out of time.
Let us all take a moment to appreciate that in all of human history, all of human language, and all of Universe itself aligned to make this post possible.All fair and all facts (although not 100% sure about the "Less NCAA Infractions).
And KU has the following over UK:
*Been around longer (admittedly only 5 years).
*Fathered Adolph Rupp, John Calipari - among the roots of much of UK in the first place.
*Been to the NCAA Tourney every year since their probation year in '89 (longest streak in the nation). Kentucky in the NIT not all that long ago, under Calipari at that & lost to freakin' Robert *Morris when in it.
*Have an = number of Championships since your current coach got there & victory for their Championship was over your current coach.
*55 points in '90 (could have been worse!)...see what I did there.
*Have never had a player ruled ineligible as an amateur (a'la Enes Kanter)
*First Champion in a Final Four with only 1-seeds.
*The worst any coach has done, except for the first (the inventor of the game, James Naismith) was to make a Final Four (Ted Owens) - Phog Allen (Championship), Dick Harp (Championship Game), Larry Brown (Championship), Roy Williams (Championship Game) & lastly Bill Self (Championship AND Championship Game).........can UK say that w/ E. Sutton, Gillespie, etc.?
All fair and all facts (although not 100% sure about the "Less NCAA Infractions).
And KU has the following over UK:
*Been around longer (admittedly only 5 years).
*Fathered Adolph Rupp, John Calipari - among the roots of much of UK in the first place.
*Been to the NCAA Tourney every year since their probation year in '89 (longest streak in the nation). Kentucky in the NIT not all that long ago, under Calipari at that & lost to freakin' Robert *Morris when in it.
*Have an = number of Championships since your current coach got there & victory for their Championship was over your current coach.
*55 points in '90 (could have been worse!)...see what I did there.
*Have never had a player ruled ineligible as an amateur (a'la Enes Kanter)
*First Champion in a Final Four with only 1-seeds.
*The worst any coach has done, except for the first (the inventor of the game, James Naismith) was to make a Final Four (Ted Owens) - Phog Allen (Championship), Dick Harp (Championship Game), Larry Brown (Championship), Roy Williams (Championship Game) & lastly Bill Self (Championship AND Championship Game).........can UK say that w/ E. Sutton, Gillespie, etc.?
Comparing UK and KU made me think of the recent list which compares the 'bluebloods' best KenPom teams (which was a topic in a very recent thread): so here are the rankings of the best 'blueblood' teams out of the 69-best* teams (*overall O & D), over the past-14 KenPom seasons/final rankings.
First, note an example of subjectiveness: 1st & 2nd place on the following list, '15 UK and '08 KU (respectively), are seperated by only 4 ten-thousandths of a point, with 2nd place '08 KU actually winning a title and '15 UK not. Side-notes: The '08 FinalFour is ranked by KenPom as the toughest of the past-14 seasons (with the '08 championship game also the toughest), and the '15 FinalFour is ranked as the fourth-toughest out of 14 (with the '15 championship game as the third-toughest..and, by the way, the '12 championship game is ranked as the sixth-toughest, but that had more to do with UK's extra-strength than KU's strength).
Point being: 1) who's to say just how big a difference, say, 4-thousandths of a point translates to (any??); 2) due to important and hard-to-measure tourney variables such as injuries, flukes&luck, homecourt advantages (crowd), coaching errors, seeding travesties, and the extreme difficulty of winning six-straight games in the modern tourney, (due to those variables) the clearly-best teams often didn't/don't win a title and 2) of course, no statistician could ever prove who was "better" with non-score numbers, but, anyway, here's how KenPom ranks, not only UK's and KU's best, recent teams, but how he ranks the other-two 'bluebloods' best teams, too (among KenPom's 69 best teams):
The list:
KenPom's best UK TEAMS, of past-14 seasons (SIX teams/69: 3 top-25, 5 top-40, only one of the six was not during the Cal era), in order:
They are:
'15 (1st), '12 (4th), '03 (25th), '10 (34th), '11 (40th), '14 (60th)
--
KU's best, KenPom teams, past-14 seasons (SIX teams: 2 top-25, 6 top-40), in order:
'08 (2nd), '10 (11th), '03 (29th), '02 (30th), '12 (32nd), '11 (33rd).
--
Duke (FOUR teams in top-69: all-four are top-15):
'02 (5th), '10 (7th), '04 (10th), '15 (15th)
--
UNC (FOUR TEAMS: 3 top-25 teams, no top-10 teams, 3 top-40):
'05 (12th), '09 (14th), '08 (21st), '12 (45th)
My interpretation of KenPom's subjective conclusion (from his past-14 seasons of data -- including strength of schedule, O & D):
Among the recent bluebloods, UK's had two of the very best teams, Duke's had, not two of the very best, but four of the top-15, which is arguably a better accomplishment than UK's top-2 teams, KU's had 6 of the top-40 teams (3 top-30, and 2 top-11), and UNC has had three top-25 teams, but no top-11), so, viewing KenPom #s, I, personally, would rank the bluebloods (over 14 seasons) in the following order:
1)Duke
2)UK (the 2014 FF was ranked as the 2nd-worst, in 14 seasons, clearly well below the other 12, per KenPom, and UK's final ranking that season was 11th, due to all the losses and poor schedule prior to the tourney, and uk won their 5 tourney games by an avg of less than 4 ppg)
3)KU (ahead of unc, due to better consistency [see specific reasons, directly above], even though only 1 championship)
4 UNC
That's just another way to rank the recent bluebloods, which, i think, falls in-line with many ppl's thinking (across the nation).
The above info helps (a little) explain the complexities of my UK vs KU argument. The only thing I'll add is that KU has clearly been a steadier program than UK, over the past 30 years.
Nice. Sacrifice your first championship In order to get rid of UK's other 4. I would do the same Kansas fan. I swear I would.
But then I guess we would have to remove Rupp out of contention for one of the greatest coaches of all time. He never even won a title in the "modern tourney". Hell, UCLA only has 2 titles.
Truth is, older tournaments just featured the best of the best or a by pass to the sweet 16/EE. Which doesn't really effect the top teams in the tournament unless you're Kansas who lose to mid majors. You don't just omit history. It messes ish up. History often repeats itself anyway ku fan.
Rupp died a Kentuckian. Stop laying claims to him.
John Calipari is not a Kansas product.
Unfortunately there is no way to rewrite history...It is a fact that Coach Rupp was a Jayhawk before he was a Wildcat. He was on the '22 and '23 Jayhawk team that was awarded the Helms Championship. I met Coach Cal in Lawrence, Kansas at a Ted Owens Basketball Camp; he was Jayhawk then.
Calipari married a KU grad too, if I am remembering correctly?
Yes. Mrs Calipari was the former Mrs. Nolan Cromwell. I think she grew up in
And I KNOW that Adolph Rupp coached at Kentucky for 41 seasons, died as a Kentuckian, coached basketball nothing like Phog Allen, and kicked Kansas' ass every time he got the chance.
The day you know more about Adolph Rupp than I do, just try me, bucko.
I wouldn't want to exclude Coach Rupp. He is one of two people that won a National Championship as a player and as a coach.
Rupp, Smith, who was the third?One of three, not two. Do some research, Kansas troll.
I understand he was a Wildcat. Spent years there. Never denied that. I just stated a fact, he was a Jayhawk before he was Wildcat.
Some guy who coached Indiana. And actually (shock), you're even more wrong than you thought. Because using the "Kansas reeking of insecurity" title standard you prefer, there's a 4th- John Wooden.Rupp, Smith, who was the third?
You are right, I forgot about him, much like I forgot about Indiana Basketball.Some guy who coached Indiana. And actually (shock), you're even more wrong than you thought. Because using the "Kansas reeking of insecurity" title standard you prefer, there's a 4th- John Wooden.
Nolan Cromwell was a all-American football player at Kansas and played pro ball for about 10 years. He was also the college champion in the 440y HH. Ran it in a time of 49 seconds.Yes. Mrs Calipari was the former Mrs. Nolan Cromwell. I think she grew up in Lawrence. She was working in the Athletic office when Coach Cal came to Kansas.
I''ll give you credit for that. I have no problems with opposing fans coming here under their true colors, as long as they have some thick skin. I do have a serious problem with the jerkoff poser who's joined you in this thread, and his ass should have been booted out of here a while ago.Actually we were both wrong...John Wooden ('32 Purdue, UCLA), Bobby Knight ('60 Cincy, Indiana) and you are right with Coach Hall.
I have never tried to hide that I am a Kansas fan. There has been no trolling.
Actually we were both wrong...John Wooden ('32 Purdue, UCLA), Bobby Knight ('60 Cincy, Indiana) and you are right with Coach Hall.
I have never tried to hide that I am a Kansas fan. There has been no trolling.
I''ll give you credit for that. I have no problems with opposing fans coming here under their true colors, as long as they have some thick skin. I do have a serious problem with the jerkoff poser who's joined you in this thread, and his ass should have been booted out of here a while ago.
Then WHY are you here? Aren't there any Kansas fans left that you can talk to? Oh' wait, you just like to troll. I digress.
Nolan Cromwell was a all-American football player at Kansas and played pro ball for about 10 years. He was also the college champion in the 440y HH. Ran it in a time of 49 seconds.
Spent some time as the Def Coordinator at Texas A&M and Special Team Coach with Green Bay Packers