Against Vandy, Kick Field Goals If Available.

[The-Hack]

Unless Vandy is boat racing us in the first half, my head will explode if we pass on field goal opportunities to hunt for 4th down conversions.

Honestly, most college teams consider field goals a 65-75% proposition from 30 yards out. I will not “curse” our kicker by going farther in the thought, but 3 points ain’t nothing to sneeze at in close fought football games.

 

[Caveman Catfan]

Pavia does not give up. In the two games I have watched, he does not rattle and makes great decisions on the run. Vandy is multiple. They get you up the middle with the spread option and then love to get Pavia on the perimeter for passing laterals and throws up the field. UK will need to play 40 minutes. Vandy does not get a home field advantage from its crowd (see Saban’s comments), but they have played worse on the road. Not sure how they lost to Georgia State. Missouri may not be top 10, but Columbia ain’t no cake walk.

 

[Doodah859]

Pavia does not give up. In the two games I have watched, he does not rattle and makes great decisions on the run. Vandy is multiple. They get you up the middle with the spread option and then love to get Pavia on the perimeter for passing laterals and throws up the field. UK will need to play 40 minutes. Vandy does not get a home field advantage from its crowd (see Saban’s comments), but they have played worse on the road. Not sure how they lost to Georgia State. Missouri may not be top 10, but Columbia ain’t no cake walk.

They probably better play 60 minutes

 

[Bluefield88]

Unless Vandy is boat racing us in the first half, my head will explode if we pass on field goal opportunities to hunt for 4th down conversions.

Honestly, most college teams consider field goals a 65-75% proposition from 30 yards out. I will not “curse” our kicker by going farther in the thought, but 3 points ain’t nothing to sneeze at in close fought football games.

Gotta listen to the 26-year-old, 5’10, 155 lbs. analytical nerds who have their faces stuck inside a tablet and their butts.

 

[Caveman Catfan]

I have not seen a ton of him, just two games, but when he rolls right, he tends to run or throw up field. When he rolls left, he runs or throws the lateral to the sideline.

 

[Soupbean]

Unless Vandy is boat racing us in the first half, my head will explode if we pass on field goal opportunities to hunt for 4th down conversions.

Honestly, most college teams consider field goals a 65-75% proposition from 30 yards out. I will not “curse” our kicker by going farther in the thought, but 3 points ain’t nothing to sneeze at in close fought football games.

Interesting discussion Hack and I see your point. There is a tendancy in games against teams that we traditionally "should handle" to think that we go into it with a cushion or margin of error that would allow us to take more chances knowing that if they dont work out we got time to make up for it because its just a matter of time before things kick in and our talent starts taking over. You know first series we get down the their 30, fourth and 4 and we take a shot at it because heck we'll hold them anyway . . . .

This Vandy team is not one of those, heck a lot of Vandy teams we've faced in recent years havent been that way. But this one in particular should get our full focus and play it like its a pickem game. That doesnt mean we play careful or scared as thats what Vandy wants us to do, but we certainly cant be cavalier and coaches need to be on their game decision making for sure.

My gut (which is right over 20% of the time) tells me we're built better to give their offense fits and slow down the option stuff and our offense I think grew up quite a bit at Ole Miss and I look for them to continue that, so I'll be surprised if we dont play well this week. But none of that matters if we dont bring intensity that had against UGA and OLE MISS.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

I have not seen a ton of him, just two games, but when he rolls right, he tends to run or throw up field. When he rolls left, he runs or throws the lateral to the sideline.

Under white we historically do an excellent job vs mobile QBs. This is for many reasons but below are some.

1) he focuses on contain to the qb dominant arm. This prevents them from being really dangerous downfield.

2) cross reads the read option. This makes it very difficult to even run that play. In fact the cross read basically destroyed that play across the nation.

3) Some obvious pass be twists or stunts to muddy the run lanes for the qb. Qb sees what looks like de losing contain but jack or mlb is stunting around to replace.

 

[FanofUK]

I have no idea why the line is so high for us, only thing I can guess is our zone gives this style of offense fits.

 

[The-Hack]

2) cross reads the read option.

Could you explain this in some detail? I am not questioning your statement, but do not know what a “cross read” is.

 

[bigblueinsanity]

Could you explain this in some detail? I am not questioning your statement, but do not know what a “cross read” is.

Glad to. Usually the read option reads the edge defender. If he stays, qb gives and lbr has to beat a block to stop. If he crashes, qb keeps and gets a good gain. There is a reason it dominated football at all levels for 10+ years

White was a pioneer of cross reading. That means he intentionally has the edge crash to take the rb but the play side lbr stuns around to replace the edge and tackles the qb.

Qb pulls because he sees the edge crash only to find an inside lb right in his face replacing the edge. It completely ruins the entire play concept.

 

[Chad Rock]

Unless Vandy is boat racing us in the first half, my head will explode if we pass on field goal opportunities to hunt for 4th down conversions.

Honestly, most college teams consider field goals a 65-75% proposition from 30 yards out. I will not “curse” our kicker by going farther in the thought, but 3 points ain’t nothing to sneeze at in close fought football games.

I'm fine with a well placed 4th down attempt but not in predictable situations. For instance, if Wimsatt comes in on 4th and 1...otherwise, yeah, get the sure 3 with our AA kicker.

 

[The-Hack]

Glad to. Usually the read option reads the edge defender. If he stays, qb gives and lbr has to beat a block to stop. If he crashes, qb keeps and gets a good gain. There is a reason it dominated football at all levels for 10+ years

White was a pioneer of cross reading. That means he intentionally has the edge crash to take the rb but the play side lbr stuns around to replace the edge and tackles the qb.

Qb pulls because he sees the edge crash only to find an inside lb right in his face replacing the edge. It completely ruins the entire play concept.

So, an ILB essentially follows the edge rusher and goes for the QB while the original edge crashes down
On the back?

Was this what was used to limit Lamar Jackson in 2016?

Or is it a more recent idea?

 

[bigblueinsanity]

So, an ILB essentially follows the edge rusher and goes for the QB while the original edge crashes down
On the back?

Was this what was used to limit Lamar Jackson in 2016?

Or is it a more recent idea?

Yes.

More recent. It really started the year before Anthony Richardson's freshman year. Its why we could stop him and many other mobile guys that used to murder us.

He uses a similar concept to confuse them in the pocket because run lanes aren't where they should be.

He really exorcized the demon of mobile qbs haunting uk for decades.

 

[The-Hack]

It really started the year before Anthony Richardson's freshman year.

So around 2019.

AR-15 never did us much damage.

Against Lamar Jackson in 2016, I thought we held our edge rushers back, and created sort of an umbrella. When the interior guys got through, the edges then closed. It looked like gap integrity and not over-running the play became more important than actual speed to the quarterback.