We have a very weak and fragile under 30 crowd. When I was 19 I had already killed men. 1967Yeah, they have it tougher than the 19-year-olds at the Battle of the Bulge.
Yep and thats exactly why people are so loud and adament at pointing out the differences in level of play between Wagner and Edwards vs Rob and Reed. You can already tell by Cal's house money qoute that he isn't choosing to see what is obvious about the two high level gaurds we have coming off the bench.The worst part is suggesting Reed, a legacy player who Cal would happily send straight to the end of the bench if he ever stops playing well, is playing with house money.
GTFO of here with that crap. Cal, you’re either a liar or a moron, but you are definitely at least one of the two.
Do you own a Gran Torino?😉😉. Just kidding. There are definitely some types of pressure that are more significant than other types of pressure and you have definitely checked the box of real pressure.We have a very weak and fragile under 30 crowd. When I was 19 I had already killed men. 1967
If those players are playing with house money, he is playing with less than a full deck.This "House money" statement by Cal is a blatant insult and infuriating. The guy never knows when to shut the hell up.
There might be a message board somewhere that is impressed with your dubious feat by age 19; however, this is a sports message board that fails to understand the relevance of your bravado.We have a very weak and fragile under 30 crowd. When I was 19 I had already killed men. 1967
I'm pleasantly surprised at how Reed has handled it for the most part. The only head scratchers have been during the KU game. I think the pressure did get to him there a bit.Which is kinda stupid. I mean Reed is a double legacy. That would be quite a bit of pressure.
Well, I appreciate what service you have done, but we should be grateful that a lot of our 30 and under crowd hasn't had to do that. That's not a knock on them.We have a very weak and fragile under 30 crowd. When I was 19 I had already killed men. 1967
Tbf, those turnovers by Rob were pretty bad. He can't play out of control like that. He does a lot of good things for us too though.It is amazing how Cal suggests that Dilly and Shep are playing with house money which is why they are out playing Edwards and Wagner. Also, he calls out Dilly by name for his three turnovers, but he says nothing about the bricks and airballs thrown towards the basket by Wagner.