Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fultz shot is too pretty to be shooting 17% from 3. I'd expect that stat to move up.
Kind of hard not too.Fultz shot is too pretty to be shooting 17% from 3. I'd expect that stat to move up.
it is about what he shot all year.
Kind of hard not too.
What did he shoot for the year?
17% at this weekends event.
during the summer he mostly played for under armor and shot 26% from three. but really those numbers were driven up a bit because he was hot the final weekend from three. it was 20%.
If you're talking Under Armour AAU events, he shot 19/71, and also struggled with FT's, hitting 54/90.What did he shoot for the year?
Yeap
If you're talking Under Armour AAU events, he shot 19/71, and also struggled with FT's, hitting 54/90.
His shot is a legit question mark. He led the Under Armour events in scoring, and he stuffed the stat-sheet in a lot of other ways, but he was definitely high-volume, low-efficiency.
Alkins is not as good a shooter as what he showed last night, but he has displayed more consistency than Fultz. He played exclusively in Adidas events, and he hit 31/83 on threes and 62/75 FT's.
In almost all of these AAU things, 3 point shooting is worse than normal because there's little set offense run, and a lot of quick-trigger 3's. Even Devin Booker had some surprisingly poor percentages in the Nike EYBL. That said, at some point you have to prove you can hit jumpshots, and that's a question with a lot of these kids. Alkins and Fultz at least appear to have good form, so you hope that will translate once they get into a more structured setting. Simmons, not so much- his jump shot is pretty busted, and you feel like the best thing he could do would be to stop taking so many.
which is why monk is #1.
Cal does not get enough credit for his scouting abilities, has clearly cooled on Simmons for this reason. No way you want him running a team. 3rd guard, sure. Reminded me of Tony Wroten.someone else mentioned that although he's probably the most athletic guy on the floor at any given time, he's out of control a lot and just drives the lane and throws the ball at the rim, said they see some Archie Goodwin. That's the same player I thought of watching him.
Cal does not get enough credit for his scouting abilities, has clearly cooled on Simmons for this reason. No way you want him running a team. 3rd guard, sure. Reminded me of Tony Wroten.
Booker shot at UK about what he shot in aau...aside from his insane start this past year he wasnt a knock down shooter. Most guys don't get to college and become great shooter s,
Meeks had a rep as a good mid-range guy in HS, but some people questioned if he had deep range. He also improved his mechanics while at UK. If you watched him in HS, he had a low release, almost a push from the shoulder type of thing. He brought that higher in college, and became deadly. Though that took a while- he shot 36.4% as a freshman. Respectable, but not an indication of what he would become.Meeks shot is ass off at Norcross. Was their primary "shooter". Was he "going to go on and be top 5 shooter all time at UK" great? No. But I cringe when people say he wasn't a "shooter" in high school. That's what Norcross had him doing a lot of. He was a "shooter" in the same sense Jamal Murray is a shooter, James Young was a shooter, Aaron Harrison was supposed to be a shooter. He just developed a little better once he got to UK.
I remember his "needs improvement" or whatever category on his Rivals profile including "outside shooting". Thought it was stupid in 2006.