Surely Cal has enough clout to say...i don't want that clown around my program
Last edited by a moderator:
Surely Cal has enough clout to say...i don't want that clown around my program
I think JC loves JT around because then he can make a fool of him, but for me I'm with you I would they would pull his passSurely Cal has enough clout to say...i don't want that clown around my program
UK can deny him access any time they want
BUT, if they did that, it would create such a firestorm of bad press--that UK is denying the press, even the consistently negative press, the right to write and speak openly and freely about the program--it would ultimately be counter-productive
What I have seen UK, and others, do in the past is simply do not invite individuals like JT to special access activities. Like one afternoon Cal invites the press he wants to a closed practice, that kind of stuff.
He's an independent writer for the city's only newspaper. He has national clout (trust me, I run in those circles). Very many sports writers, especially beat writers, make a point to be seen as tough on the local program. Nothing earns more scorn among sports writing colleagues than someone who is considered a "homer."
Fans think he's always negative, and he does ask ridiculous and leading questions, but the poster who noted that it would be a bigger story if they started kicking people out is right. If you think his asinine questions are bad, imagine the articles from CBS, ESPN, Sporting News, Fox Sports, CNN, etc.etc.etc. if they banned a writer who is already in the Sports Writers Hall of Fame, it would be a mess, and for zero reason except some lame questions.
I too have always wondered thisSurely Cal has enough clout to say...i don't want that clown around my program
You sound like a Tipton fan.He's an independent writer for the city's only newspaper. He has national clout (trust me, I run in those circles). Very many sports writers, especially beat writers, make a point to be seen as tough on the local program. Nothing earns more scorn among sports writing colleagues than someone who is considered a "homer."
Fans think he's always negative, and he does ask ridiculous and leading questions, but the poster who noted that it would be a bigger story if they started kicking people out is right. If you think his asinine questions are bad, imagine the articles from CBS, ESPN, Sporting News, Fox Sports, CNN, etc.etc.etc. if they banned a writer who is already in the Sports Writers Hall of Fame, it would be a mess, and for zero reason except some lame questions.
...and because UK and Cal can take anything that a**hole puts out without resorting to Jurich tactics. It's a pain for sure but at least we're not Scandal U with the press covering for us and getting patted on the head for doing so...thank you Eric Crawford.UK doesn't want to make Tipton the story any more than Tipton already makes himself the story.
Are you saying nearly the entire press in North Carolina are scorned by the National press because there is only one guy in the entire state that does not worship at the alter of Chapel hill? I don't mind a beat writer being hard on the local team but Tipton is just poor and I can cite plenty of examples.He's an independent writer for the city's only newspaper. He has national clout (trust me, I run in those circles). Very many sports writers, especially beat writers, make a point to be seen as tough on the local program. Nothing earns more scorn among sports writing colleagues than someone who is considered a "homer."
Fans think he's always negative, and he does ask ridiculous and leading questions, but the poster who noted that it would be a bigger story if they started kicking people out is right. If you think his asinine questions are bad, imagine the articles from CBS, ESPN, Sporting News, Fox Sports, CNN, etc.etc.etc. if they banned a writer who is already in the Sports Writers Hall of Fame, it would be a mess, and for zero reason except some lame questions.
Give 5 examples.Are you saying nearly the entire press in North Carolina are scorned by the National press because there is only one guy in the entire state that does not worship at the alter of Chapel hill? I don't mind a beat writer being hard on the local team but Tipton is just poor and I can cite plenty of examples.
UK can deny him access any time they want
BUT, if they did that, it would create such a firestorm of bad press--that UK is denying the press, even the consistently negative press, the right to write and speak openly and freely about the program--it would ultimately be counter-productive
What I have seen UK, and others, do in the past is simply do not invite individuals like JT to special access activities. Like one afternoon Cal invites the press he wants to a closed practice, that kind of stuff.
Azuibuike's DadGive 5 examples.
Azuibuike's Dad
Patterson's truck
Rondo's car
Lack of coverage of Billy Gillispie's problems
Attempting to prejudice recruits during phone calls
I don't buy any of this. Nobody besides other writers would care if UK banned Tipton from the program. I'm sure there's a reason why they haven't given that turd the boot, but this is not it.He's an independent writer for the city's only newspaper. He has national clout (trust me, I run in those circles). Very many sports writers, especially beat writers, make a point to be seen as tough on the local program. Nothing earns more scorn among sports writing colleagues than someone who is considered a "homer."
Fans think he's always negative, and he does ask ridiculous and leading questions, but the poster who noted that it would be a bigger story if they started kicking people out is right. If you think his asinine questions are bad, imagine the articles from CBS, ESPN, Sporting News, Fox Sports, CNN, etc.etc.etc. if they banned a writer who is already in the Sports Writers Hall of Fame, it would be a mess, and for zero reason except some lame questions.
He's an independent writer for the city's only newspaper. He has national clout (trust me, I run in those circles). Very many sports writers, especially beat writers, make a point to be seen as tough on the local program. Nothing earns more scorn among sports writing colleagues than someone who is considered a "homer."
Fans think he's always negative, and he does ask ridiculous and leading questions, but the poster who noted that it would be a bigger story if they started kicking people out is right. If you think his asinine questions are bad, imagine the articles from CBS, ESPN, Sporting News, Fox Sports, CNN, etc.etc.etc. if they banned a writer who is already in the Sports Writers Hall of Fame, it would be a mess, and for zero reason except some lame questions.
I was wondering the same dang thing!I'd be interested what the scuttlebutt is about the Louisville homer media then. Is it pretty much common knowledge that they are all Jurich's lapdogs?
I'd be interested what the scuttlebutt is about the Louisville homer media then. Is it pretty much common knowledge that they are all Jurich's lapdogs?
Can you imagine if he was a UL beat writer? He'd be like a kid in a candy store. I wonder what his salary is . There is practically no job that reguires less skill than what he does. Most high school sophomores can do what he does .Agree. The national media would have a field day with it if we banned him.
Tipton doesn't matter...He has no leverage good or bad. In my opinion, Cal could care less about him and what he writes.
Name 5 moreAnd there's many more. Some of our younger fans are just retarded.
So, the University of KY is worried about how other sportswriters would view the program if we pulled Tipton's press pass? Sorry but, who the f#%k cares??? He's awful and takes any opportunity he can to try and "catch" UK doing something illegal.
Wasn't it Tipton that asked some completely ridiculous and insensitive question to John Wall about his father? Maybe it wasn't him, can't be sure. But, 95% of sportswriters are complete and total morons anyway.
If Tipton can't catch players in a wrongdoing or saying something contraversial then he just makes shit up! He's a weasel and a slug. I say make him an example for all to see. You can still do your job, ask probing and tough questions. You can even not like the coach but, stop trying to bait our players and catch them in mistakes.
Show him the damn door and kick his ass on the way out!