I've got the same except Hakeem instead of magic. Who would guard Hakeem on your squad? NobodyMagic
Jordan
LeBron
Bird
Shaq
I would win 10 out of 10 against any other combo with this team.
Hakeem clyde mike Larry magicMy Top 5 are
LeBron James
Larry Bird
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Magic Johnson
Michael Jordan
I believe former LSU coach Johnny Jones could win with this lineup.
Malone stock.....Dale Isaiah thomasHakeem clyde mike Larry magic
Dom Wilkins Doc Rivers mark Jackson tree Rollins moses Malone Kevin duck worth lambeer Patrick Ewing Gerald WilkinsMy Top 5 are
LeBron James
Larry Bird
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Magic Johnson
Michael Jordan
I believe former LSU coach Johnny Jones could win with this lineup.
Late eighties/early nineties NBA was fumDom Wilkins Doc Rivers mark Jackson tree Rollins moses Malone Kevin duck worth lambeer Patrick Ewing Gerald Wilkins
For me personal mid 80's to early 90's was fun NBA!My Top 5 are
LeBron James
Larry Bird
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
Magic Johnson
Michael Jordan
I believe former LSU coach Johnny Jones could win with this lineup.
You a Utah fan?Bird
Stockton
Jordan
Jabbar
Karl Malone
Are we making a team or are we just listing players?
If it's just a list, some of the choices I'm seeing are ridiculous. Robertson has no business in the discussion. Stockton and Malone do not either. It's debateable they were even the best player at their position when they played.
Everyone on the list should have multiple rings, multiple MVP's, and multiple Finals MVP's.
MJ
Kareem
James
Bird
Duncan
Magic
I'll give you Kobe, Shaq, and Hakeem because they probably should have won another MVP at some point. Russell and Wilt would have multiple finals MVP's if the award existed throughout their careers.
Those are your choices.
You put anyone who is in the conversation of best pg ever and have them play in the 60's, they would put up ridiculous numbers. Both because of the drop in overall competition, and because of all the extra possessions they'd get from the faster pace they played back then.You must not know Oscar Robertson. Some of the ridiculous stats that James Harden put up this season with triple-doubles are only now approaching Robertson territory. He was and still is the best PG to play the game.
Karl Malone is second only to Jabbar in points scored and is the best PF in the game, IMHO.
Robertson
Jordan
James
K. Malone
Shaq
You put anyone who is in the conversation of best pg ever and have them play in the 60's, they would put up ridiculous numbers. Both because of the drop in overall competition, and because of all the extra possessions they'd get from the faster pace they played back then.
I'm not one of those RINGZ idiots, but you still need to win to be in the conversation. All Malone has is one MVP, and people joke about how undeserving it was to this day. He'd be tied with Barkley for the fourth forward I would take after James, Bird, and Duncan (if you consider him a forward).
Because he's not one of the five greatest players of all time. Not now that LeBron is firmly in the top 5.
Younger folks, who never saw Wilt play, think that he averaged big numbers playing in an earlier era. He played a team game. If he played today, and wanted to put up numbers, he would dominate a game. He was that good, and his game, along with his athleticism would translate to today's game, very well. In fact, he would be better today, than he was in his time, since he would not be discriminated against, by the referees. Defenses were allowed to push and shove him, without a lot of calls, simply because the referees thought that was the only way to keep it a fair game.
Agree with you completely. Doesn't being difficult to guard kind of a all-time great trait?I see folks say that Wilt was bigger and stronger than everyone else and that is why he was able to do that back in the day. Those same folks say LeBron is one of the best ever. LeBron is what he is because he is a matchup nightmare just like Wilt. He is too big and strong for small guards but too quick for most post guys. If LeBron is one of the greatest because he is an athletic freak of nature and is hard for anyone to guard then you can't discount what Wilt was able to accomplish for the same reasons.
I think most would agree with your top five if we're just talking best/greatest 5 players and not going by position.
Just outside the top 5 you've got that next tier of Duncan, Wilt, Russell, Oscar, Kobe, West, Hakeem where things start to get a little more debatable.
I'm also sure people in this thread will argue for Russell or Wilt in the top 5. They'll be wrong, but they'll argue it.
I have to put Bill Russell into the mix he had 11 ELEVEN championships .
You sound like Matt Jones....you think your opinion is the only one that is right.![]()
Did you see Wilt play? Anybody who thinks Jabbar was better than Wilt is seriously reaching.. Wilt was better defensively, offensively, and physically. Jabbar was a winner though and the sky hook was revolutionary. The NBA never changed it's rules to slow down Kareem though... It did for Wilt
Any Top 5 without Bill Russell, the absolute GOAT and nobody close, is a joke!!!!![]()
Some opinions are right and some are wrong. Pretending that they're all equal and you can have whatever opinion you want and no one can tell you otherwise is disastrous.
I wish fifth grade teachers would stop teaching the false dichotomy that everything is either a fact or an opinion.
Kareem when he was in his prime his first 12 to 14 years he put up monster numbers. Several years over 30 points a game. several years over 16 rebounds a game. years of 3.5 & 4 blocked shots a game. To say he's not a Top 3 center of all time. Please, you don't want to say that.Good debate while we wait for October!
Kareem played over 20 seasons and his yearly averages aren't that impressive. I give him all the credit for longevity but cannot make him a top 3 center.
There are 2 players I can think of that have had great names bestowed on them only to change them:
Lew Alcindor
Cassius Clay
No duh, the five best players in the league at the time who you could actually compare to modern athletes would make a pretty good team. That doesn't disprove anything I said. He has 1 MVP and he put up stats in an era where having his physical gifts and the play style would allow you to put up ridiculous numbers. He has one title which was a result of teaming up with Kareem after he started declining. I never said he wasn't great, he was, but in this discussion he just doesn't fit.Oscar Robertson was a 6'5" point guard that would dominate the game at his position in any era.
If you want to use metrics to analyze players across the years, there is a Similarity Scoring method:
Robertson ranks higher in this metric than Jerry west, Magic Johnson, Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant and anyone
else to play the guard position in the NBA.
He was a 12-time all star and in the top 5 of the MVP voting 9 consecutive years.
4th all time in FT attempts
6th all time in assists
9th in points per game
I'll make a team from the 1960's that would win the NBA title right now:
PG Robertson
SG Jerry west
SF Elgin Baylor
PF Bill Russell
C Wilt Chamberlain
![]()
I don't think it's fair to hold fg% against him. It was about quantity more than quality back then. If he was born 20 years ago and had all of the modern day benefits, he's prime Dwight Howard with Nikola Jokic's passing and a killer instinct. That's a great player, easily in the hall of fame. Best player in the league? I don't know.You think the greatest player of all time averaged 15 points per game on 45% shooting as a center in an era with 8 teams and few big men?
And it isn't even close? Is Bob Cousy better than Magic Johnson?
Would rather have Wilt as the center.Better rebounder and defensive playerThis is should be end of discussion if we're going by position
Since basketball is a team sport the object is to win titles, 11 world championships is a very good indicator of how good he was . He made the other team members better .IMO he's overrated. He was absolutely great defensively but not so much offensively. He also played on teams that would have won without him. Of the centers I pertsonally saw play a good deal I'd put him 3rd.. Wilt, Jabbar were better IMO
Anyone who thinks Kareem was better than Wilt is reaching? Well then the majority of the educated and respected basketball community is reaching. They must not value arbitrary nonsense enough.
I'm sure someone was the reason they don't use peach baskets anymore. That's the benefit of playing a long time ago against inferior competition, not an indication of greatness.
The game/league needed to change and grow because it was in its infancy, which, if anything, discounts Wilt's greatness because it shows that the dynamic of the league wasn't one that could conceive of a man who was of what is now a common size. They'd have had to change the rules for DeAndre Jordan, but he isn't a top five player all time.
You can think Wilt is better than Kareem if you think Westbrook is better than LeBron James. Elite talent putting up hollow stats in a situation geared toward featuring them doesn't equate to greatness. Or is Pete Maravich better than Kareem too?
You think the greatest player of all time averaged 15 points per game on 45% shooting as a center in an era with 8 teams and few big men?
And it isn't even close? Is Bob Cousy better than Magic Johnson?