Or rather, what makes a good Division I level coach?
I think it’s safe to say that every guy coaching at the DI level has a lifelong commitment to basketball. They likely played at some point, maybe for an excellent coach or two. They likely worked under other good coaches. Their lives are committed to basketball. Why is it that only a few them can consistently compete at the highest level? And why is it that some of them completely flame out when they have such robust backgrounds to be successful?
I think it’s safe to say that every guy coaching at the DI level has a lifelong commitment to basketball. They likely played at some point, maybe for an excellent coach or two. They likely worked under other good coaches. Their lives are committed to basketball. Why is it that only a few them can consistently compete at the highest level? And why is it that some of them completely flame out when they have such robust backgrounds to be successful?