Wow you have been disappointed about 90% of Kentucky's history of playing basketball lolFF
But I get sick when Dougy runs out there with a whistle.
That why I always say "contender". We should 100% contend for a final four next year. Will we make it? maybe not, but an early exit in the tournament is not acceptable. It wasn't acceptable for Cal and it shouldn't be acceptable for Pope.I find it incredibly difficult to have firm tournament expectations. It's such a random event. I hate distilling the entire season down to whatever round you lose in. NC State had a miracle run last year, and yeah their fans had fun for two weeks, but their overall season sucked, their coach got fired this year, and their program is in bad shape. Auburn lost in the first round to Yale and look where they are now.
I'd much rather look at it as what are my expectations going into the tournament. To me, a top 3 seed with a team that's playing great basketball by the postseason is the expectation. It always looks nice on paper to say something like the Elite 8 is the minimum expectation, but I just find it a bit of a fool's errand to put all your expectation eggs into a single elimination basket.
A legit Final Four contender is my expectation. making it at least to the Elite Eight in the process.
There is no reason whatsoever that we should not expect to make a FF every year going forward until changes are made to the transfer portal. In past years we could say that we were in a "rebuilding year." Those days are gone. Now there is no excuse not to go out and get experienced talent that has the potential to win a NC.That why I always say "contender". We should 100% contend for a final four next year. Will we make it? maybe not, but an early exit in the tournament is not acceptable. It wasn't acceptable for Cal and it should be acceptable for Pope.
Something to maybe ponder? E8s
Kentucky-38
UNC-29
Duke-25
KU-24(2nd winningest program my ass)
UCLA-22
Nobody else even in the 20s. MSU is at 15
![]()
The 17 NCAA College Teams with Most Elite 8 Appearances in March Madness History - Interbasket
The first and second round of March Madness is complete, the field was trimmed by more than half the selected college programs than when the tournament kicked off with 68 teams at the inception. Now with the Sweet 16 bracket […]www.interbasket.net
Final Four. Part way through this year it became the expectation before the injuries. We could compete and beat any of the 1 seeds when healthy.
This comment has Cal written all over it.I find it incredibly difficult to have firm tournament expectations. It's such a random event. I hate distilling the entire season down to whatever round you lose in. NC State had a miracle run last year, and yeah their fans had fun for two weeks, but their overall season sucked, their coach got fired this year, and their program is in bad shape. Auburn lost in the first round to Yale and look where they are now.
I'd much rather look at it as what are my expectations going into the tournament. To me, a top 3 seed with a team that's playing great basketball by the postseason is the expectation. It always looks nice on paper to say something like the Elite 8 is the minimum expectation, but I just find it a bit of a fool's errand to put all your expectation eggs into a single elimination basket.
Depends on who we get in the Portal, who comes back, and injuries, of course.
Sweet Sixteen is a safe expectation.
Until Pope has a roster full of guys that have played for him for multiple years, a Final Four will be hard to come by.
Look at the recent success stories. Hurley had to get guys to stick around to have success. Purdue as well, had guys like Edey stick around for multiple years. Pearl’s team is a bunch of Seniors that have played together for multiple years. Same thing for Sampson at Houston. Even Duke has some guys that have been in the program multiple years and K laid the foundation for Scheyer, he didn’t come in with an empty cupboard like Pope.
So it might take Pope a few years to get us back to the Final Four. He has to build this right. It is going to be difficult to balance winning now and maintaining, but also building for the future. He can’t just keep reloading with Seniors every year. That will keep us competitive, but won’t get us to true contender level, IMHO.
Seems like Pope is working with that goal in mind. He doesn’t seem to be chasing a bunch of Seniors like last year that will allow us to compete for just one year.Scheyer makes a Final Four year three, after being left with a juggernaut. Was favorite in EE Year 2.
Cal did it year 2, mastering the OAD era.
RP took 4 years, with years 1 and 2 on probation. Lost EE game of the century year 3.
Agree that next year isn’t urgent but we better be knocking on the door at minimum. If we don’t feel like one of the favorites by year 3, something probably isn’t quite working.
Math is hard.Wow you have been disappointed about 90% of Kentucky's history of playing basketball lol
It’s amazing to me that basically saying I’m going to be patient with Pope gets looked at as being a pro-Cal comment. I think maybe it’s time for you guys to move on.This comment has Cal written all over it.
If Pope gets UK to the Elite 8 in year 2, after the Sweet 16 in year 1, it's a successful season. Anything more is tremendous.
The game has changed. We won't know what any contender's roster truly looks like for another month or two.
I expect him to build with the future in mind, with a team next year much like this year, but a little younger.Seems like Pope is working with that goal in mind. He doesn’t seem to be chasing a bunch of Seniors like last year that will allow us to compete for just one year.
Look at the main guys we are being mentioned with, most of them are going to be Sophomores or Juniors. He’s thinking that we need to have most of these guys buy into the system and return so we can make a legitimate run at a Final Four/title in 26-27 and beyond.
People may not like it if we don’t make a big jump next season, but if Pope gets a bunch of young guys in here and they sick around, it could pay dividends in the long run.
It should be acceptable for Pope?That why I always say "contender". We should 100% contend for a final four next year. Will we make it? maybe not, but an early exit in the tournament is not acceptable. It wasn't acceptable for Cal and it should be acceptable for Pope.
yeah, yeah...you know what I meant 🤣It should be acceptable for Pope?
Sorry I thought rounding up wasnt that big of a deal but to be exact you were disappointed 86 seasons. Kentucky has played basketball 122 seasons and has 17 final fours.Math is hard.
Get help.