I just read an article he wrote (didn't know he was the author til afterward) about Calipari's 30 for 30 and he managed to still construct parts as a slight and following the article, made mention of "death threats" by Kentucky fans and then discussed how announcers being critical of refs can incite violence (idiotic). Fans have eyeballs.
But this tool seems to have been critical of this program for my entire life. I've never seen a sports beat writer show so much dislike toward the subject he's covering. Most guys tend to have some cheerleader in them (not asking for that) but he's always negative. He also seems to love discussing the 80s scandal.
What is this guy's problem? Where does he come from and has he always been like this? He's honestly the worst. I remember being beside him at a book signing of Cal's in 2009 and remember reading what he wrote later being exaggerated and no shortage of jabs.
But this tool seems to have been critical of this program for my entire life. I've never seen a sports beat writer show so much dislike toward the subject he's covering. Most guys tend to have some cheerleader in them (not asking for that) but he's always negative. He also seems to love discussing the 80s scandal.
What is this guy's problem? Where does he come from and has he always been like this? He's honestly the worst. I remember being beside him at a book signing of Cal's in 2009 and remember reading what he wrote later being exaggerated and no shortage of jabs.