this x 2That has a real chance to probably be the best offensive line UKs ever had.
this x 2That has a real chance to probably be the best offensive line UKs ever had.
Actually, no. We still have big problems to solve at tackle. Until those are solved, this won't be that kind of a line, even though we have really good guards now. Don't know if you are young or old, but Kentucky has had some pretty good offensive lines in the past under Bryant, Bradshaw, Curci, Claiborne.That has a real chance to probably be the best offensive line UKs ever had.
Do you always rain on the parade?Actually, no. We still have big problems to solve at tackle. Until those are solved, this won't be that kind of a line, even though we have really good guards now. Don't know if you are young or old, but Kentucky has had some pretty good offensive lines in the past under Bryant, Bradshaw, Curci, Claiborne.
For those that have the ability and inclination, I would be interested in knowing what the addition of Jones would have done to the ranking of our 14' class.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned that I know of is that Jones will be a big asset this fall going against our defensive ones and twos while on the scout team.
it would have given us 30 more points and bumped us above South Carolina for 16th avg 3.34*For those that have the ability and inclination, I would be interested in knowing what the addition of Jones would have done to the ranking of our 14' class.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned that I know of is that Jones will be a big asset this fall going against our defensive ones and twos while on the scout team.
No. Why? Do you think we are about to have the best offensive line UK has ever had?Do you always rain on the parade?
No. Why? Do you think we are about to have the best offensive line UK has ever had?
i don't know about all time.. mainly because i am only 23, but, on paper, i do believe we have a chance to have one of the best, if not the best, in a long time. I do realize this is only on paper and contains a lot of ifs but it is a big step forward from where our program was just a few years ago. And, to be honest, whether it is or isn't doesn't really concern me.. I'm just happy we are starting to have these conversations. On top of that, if stoops stay, the o-line that we will have in a couple years will just become what we will have here.. and that is the best part to me.No. Why? Do you think we are about to have the best offensive line UK has ever had?
On paper, we have the best offensive guards we have had since the 1970s, and that's real progress. The situation with our tackles is just not there yet. If you are looking for a strong interior for our running game, this is rapidly becoming a real SEC line. But if you are concerned about pass protection on the edges, since Dawson wants to throw downfield, we still have major problems. I honestly don't understand how anyone can look at our tackles and say this is 1 of Kentucky's best offensive lines, although I wish it was better. Maybe we can get a couple more commitments in this class to change the picture at the tackles.i don't know about all time.. mainly because i am only 23, but, on paper, i do believe we have a chance to have one of the best, if not the best, in a long time. I do realize this is only on paper and contains a lot of ifs but it is a big step forward from where our program was just a few years ago. And, to be honest, whether it is or isn't doesn't really concern me.. I'm just happy we are starting to have these conversations. On top of that, if stoops stay, the o-line that we will have in a couple years will just become what we will have here.. and that is the best part to me.
I am sure pessimistic about you as a poster. How old are you anyway? You post like an attention starved teenager.In fairness, you do come off rather pessimistic.
at our current tackles.. definitely not. i thought we were talking once Landon Young gets on campus to potentially go with Leavitt and then Wills the following year to go along with Richardson and Meadows.. that is starting to get depth with potentially a RS fr young a SR Leavitt a Sr Meadows a RS Jr Richardson and Wills getting to RS... I know that is two big ifs with Leavitt and Wills.. but fingers crossedOn paper, we have the best offensive guards we have had since the 1970s, and that's real progress. The situation with our tackles is just not there yet. If you are looking for a strong interior for our running game, this is rapidly becoming a real SEC line. But if you are concerned about pass protection on the edges, since Dawson wants to throw downfield, we still have major problems. I honestly don't understand how anyone can look at our tackles and say this is 1 of Kentucky's best offensive lines, although I wish it was better. Maybe we can get a couple more commitments in this class to change the picture at the tackles.
I am sure pessimistic about you as a poster. How old are you anyway? You post like an attention starved teenager.
You will soon be a key component in one of the greatest offensive lines in college football.
GBB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please edit title to spell Welcome correctly.It's really been a perfect storm of events with commitments from unprecedented in-state talents Young and Jackson, essentially getting Jones retroactively back from the 2014 class and ahead in the horse race for Wills which IMO will be the best of all of them.
We all know that championship caliber teams are build from the lines out. We now are putting together a heck of a foundation for an elite level offense. Undoubtedly these commitments have raised eyebrows all over the country and will really help attract top level talent at the offensive skill positions for the next couple of classes.
Please edit title to spell Welcome correctly.
Pretty much agree about DTs and a natural cover corners as being the toughest to recruit. Very few bigs that run and "athletes" with the speed and swivel to be a great cover guy. And if you've got the skills, CB is probably the easiest position to play as you will probably be in man coverage 80% of the time. That's a big IF however.I do not disagree that the OL position are very important but disagree that they are the hardest positions to recruit in football. IMO DL and good cover corners are rarer than OLs and much harder to recruit. They might be the hardest positions to recruit on the offensive side of the ball.
the thing about manufacturing olinemen and bringing in road graders is that the one can be effective with a scheme and coaching but the other can be absolute game changers. wisconsin and now arky have proven that a really solid, big, athletic oline can make a team better than the rb, qb, and wr suggest they should be. you watch some of marcelys highlights and he blows up some dang good football players. not just block them then lay on them but he actually decleated people on the oline. guys like that "can" make a good back look great or a great back look unstoppable.Pretty much agree about DTs and a natural cover corners as being the toughest to recruit. Very few bigs that run and "athletes" with the speed and swivel to be a great cover guy. And if you've got the skills, CB is probably the easiest position to play as you will probably be in man coverage 80% of the time. That's a big IF however.
OTOH, a program with good coaching and good S & C can "manufacture" decent O-linemen given some time and some kids with some degree of talent and desire. And UK is certainly racking up some very good raw talent.
Peace
With all those that mentioned above, which would include the best depth ever at UK, I would challenge any UK fan to name a better and deeper O-line that has ever been at UK.....That has a real chance to probably be the best offensive line UKs ever had.
Actually, no. We still have big problems to solve at tackle. Until those are solved, this won't be that kind of a line, even though we have really good guards now. Don't know if you are young or old, but Kentucky has had some pretty good offensive lines in the past under Bryant, Bradshaw, Curci, Claiborne.
you ought to watch some of his hs highlights. he decleated guys on the line. im not talking about catching guys off gaurd. he was lined up with some guys and just punched out and they landed on their back..... he is a natural freak. if we get him to buy in then he could very well be the best interior lineman in a long time and that is with having larry warford doing very well in the pros.Jones looks so much more physically mature than most of our guys. Like he could hurt somebody or something.
Pretty much agree about DTs and a natural cover corners as being the toughest to recruit. Very few bigs that run and "athletes" with the speed and swivel to be a great cover guy. And if you've got the skills, CB is probably the easiest position to play as you will probably be in man coverage 80% of the time. That's a big IF however.
OTOH, a program with good coaching and good S & C can "manufacture" decent O-linemen given some time and some kids with some degree of talent and desire. And UK is certainly racking up some very good raw talent.
Peace
Potential OL in a couple of years.
LT: Wills
LG: Jones
C: Jackson
RG: GAA
RT: Young
That is a ton of talent.
It's really been a perfect storm of events with commitments from unprecedented in-state talents Young and Jackson, essentially getting Jones retroactively back from the 2014 class and ahead in the horse race for Wills which IMO will be the best of all of them.
We all know that championship caliber teams are build from the lines out. We now are putting together a heck of a foundation for an elite level offense. Undoubtedly these commitments have raised eyebrows all over the country and will really help attract top level talent at the offensive skill positions for the next couple of classes.
Predicting the future starting line is a crap shoot.
Let's just be excited that we're getting dudes that are legit. Now it's up to Schlarman to develop these players.Predicting the future starting line is a crap shoot.