I'm always amazed at the over-inflated view that the UL fanbase seems to have of its program. Their golden years were built on a mirage of horrible scheduling. Even when they were "great", UK still had more quality wins than they ever had. When it comes to the series between the two schools, UK should be embarrassed that it's even close. A lack of investment by UK and NCAA probation gave UL some good years, but the series is now what it should be.
UK has:
-The better conference
-More resources
-Better facilities
-Better school
-Better campus (although an urban sprawl university will be attractive to some)
-Better fanbase
-Better brand
There is literally no reason why UK should lose to UL in athletics of any kind, much less football. Our gigantic talent advantage and lopsided results over the last 5 years are symbolic of all of the other advantages that we have over that school and team. I'm sure we'll lose one to them now and then based on the law of averages, but this series has settled into what it should always be.
UK has:
-The better conference
-More resources
-Better facilities
-Better school
-Better campus (although an urban sprawl university will be attractive to some)
-Better fanbase
-Better brand
There is literally no reason why UK should lose to UL in athletics of any kind, much less football. Our gigantic talent advantage and lopsided results over the last 5 years are symbolic of all of the other advantages that we have over that school and team. I'm sure we'll lose one to them now and then based on the law of averages, but this series has settled into what it should always be.