The mindset that you need 1st round picks to field a good college basketball team needs to stop.
Those teams had no where near the depth of this team.I’m not concerned about our talent level. I think it’s within the realm of possibility that we are on the level of 2003-2005. Those were pretty strong teams.
My only real concern is how we step up in big games. We are going to have a bunch. Do we wilt under pressure, or remain cohesive?
If we wilt, I could see us being a 5-6 seed type of spoiler team. Remain cohesive and we can be a 1-2. Very few teams will be able to run with us/guard us for 40 minutes. And I don’t think we’ll be a revolving door on defense like we were last season.
Alas, the font of reason.I don’t see where you get that about talent. We got 2 to 3 of the most prolific three-point shooters in the country and we have three of the best defense players in the country. I believe our talent level is higher than 5 to 6.
Both our two wins were higher ranked than Duke's two wins.We actually have no clue yet. That might be the case. But we haven’t played anyone with a pulse yet. I’d say come January we’ll know how good we are
I think they’re a better team, despite not necessarily having any lottery level draft picks, than a 4-5 seed. Guess we’ll know soon enough.5 to 6 seed-level talent. 1 to 3 seed-level head coach.
I think our reasonable goal is a 4 or 5 seed.
excellent point. we aught to be playing free and loose. which always makes for a dangerous teamIt would be a bad look for Scheyer to lose to Pope tomorrow night. He's established, now in his third year, playing with the probable #1 pick in the country.
The media will lash out at him if he loses to a first-year Pope team.
UK is playing with house money tomorrow night.
Do you have a dook degree? And yes, I have two from UK getting a doctorate and completing a residency.No, not better. I’m guessing you are one of our crazy fans in BBN who does not actually hold a UK degree. Thus, we have your unbridled enthusiasm and wild takes.
Shhh, spies everywhere.did anybody else think we ran a simpler offense with less zoom action our last game than the previous 3. I thought it was more just simple drive and pass, and pass around the 3 point line.. I wonder if Pope wanted to miss-direct Duke's study of us.
They didn’t, but they had guys who had played a lot of games together. They had also been to back to back Sweet 16 ahead of that 3 year run.Those teams had no where near the depth of this team.
Or, just take the devils by the horns from the outset of the season and never look back!They didn’t, but they had guys who had played a lot of games together. They had also been to back to back Sweet 16 ahead of that 3 year run.
We have to step back up and reclaim our spot at the highest levels. It’s more psychological than anything, imo.
If you win 9 or 10 of those 15, and lose the others respectably a 3 seed would be in order...that's probably a top 12 team resumeIt's called, "playing in the SEC" and about 14 or 15 games against current top 25 teams.
You don't come through that gauntlet with a top 3 seed. Then again, you're the guy who thinks every UK team is going to win the national title.
I honestly believe we can get a 3/4 seed this year.5 to 6 seed-level talent. 1 to 3 seed-level head coach.
I think our reasonable goal is a 4 or 5 seed.
I honestly believe we can get a 3/4 seed this year.
Bingo! Cal type coaches need a go to guy to score late in a game and take over. Pope type coaches scheme guys open and play to their strengths. I’d rather have that any day personally.I don't think a team with this many threats needs one "go to" scorer. The team is built this way and I like that we may not need a "go to" guy.
For the life of me, I can't understand why a handful of posters here keep knocking our talent and athleticism. Not starting a fight, I just don't see what a few of your guys are seeing.
Good for you. And what priority rank are you with the K Fund?Do you have a dook degree? And yes, I have two from UK getting a doctorate and completing a residency.
Good for you. And what priority rank are you with the K Fund?
Good for you. And what priority rank are you with the K Fund?
It would be a bad look for Scheyer to lose to Pope tomorrow night. He's established, now in his third year, playing with the probable #1 pick in the country.
The media will lash out at him if he loses to a first-year Pope team.
UK is playing with house money tomorrow night.
I could see a super high seed for sure but I think we average out between both. A 3 seed or above would be remarkable starting with 0 players.I think our ceiling is a 1 or 2. 5 or 6 would be the floor, based on everything I've seen so far.
Shhh, spies everywheredid anybody else think we ran a simpler offense with less zoom action our last game than the previous 3. I thought it was more just simple drive and pass, and pass around the 3 point line.. I wonder if Pope wanted to miss-direct Duke's study of us.
You didn’t answer the question. Dook degree or not? You criticized TH about not having a degree from UK. Tell us about yours.Good for you. And what priority rank are you with the K Fund?
Go look at my 8 years of posts, wise guy. I hold a BA and JD from UK.Shhh, spies everywhere
You didn’t answer the question. Dook degree or not? You criticized TH about not having a degree from UK. Tell us about yours.
A UK degree bridles enthusiasm and tames takes?No, not better. I’m guessing you are one of our crazy fans in BBN who does not actually hold a UK degree. Thus, we have your unbridled enthusiasm and wild takes.