Had great offenses when OC at OH St, did okay at TX but not good enough for their fan base. If we move on from Hamdan, would he be a candidate that we would want to talk to?
Not sure why you believe that. I may be mistaken, but OSU won the Natty with Herman as OC and their 3rd string QB who sliced and diced every opponent. Had really good years at Houston (I believe they beat Lamar and the Ville in a key game with him at the helm) before moving on to TX. I don't recall that his offenses weren't any good there, either, but I may just not remember accurately.In all seriousness, a 7-8 grade OC is better than him
Dead serious. Not kidding
Good to great OCs are good & great because they have first, a really good QB, OL, RB, and WRs. Do you think we have these things to make a OC look great? Just asking!Not sure why you believe that. I may be mistaken, but OSU won the Natty with Herman as OC and their 3rd string QB who sliced and diced every opponent. Had really good years at Houston (I believe they beat Lamar and the Ville in a key game with him at the helm) before moving on to TX. I don't recall that his offenses weren't any good there, either, but I may just not remember accurately.
I am curious why you believe he's a horrible OC in light of what we've got right now. I'm not saying that he SHOULD be on the short list but only WOULD he be a consideration if we move away from Hamdan who, imo, has been very disappointing from a lot of different standpoints.
Agree with everything you said. But, we'll literally never have good to great personnel at all offensive positions, so, using your logic, we won't ever have a good OC. That, I don't buy.Good to great OCs are good & great because they have first, a really good QB, OL, RB, and WRs. Do you think we have these things to make a OC look great? Just asking!