ADVERTISEMENT

Title IX strikes again

ctroberts1024

All-American
Gold Member
Jan 6, 2015
27,939
79,494
113
34
Not only is title IX the most pointless and fraudulent thing ever. Ruined numerous people’s lives over false claims and is just a free handout.

But now, they’re stating that all NIL money should be distributed among all sports (they mean just women sports) evenly. So you won’t be able to donate to a schools NIL fund without that money going to all women’s sports as well.

Gonna completely change the landscape of NIL from here on out. Completely ignorant imo. The sports and athletes generating the most revenue should get the most money. I couldn’t care less what sex they are.
 
Not only is title IX the most pointless and fraudulent thing ever. Ruined numerous people’s lives over false claims and is just a free handout.

But now, they’re stating that all NIL money should be distributed among all sports (they mean just women sports) evenly. So you won’t be able to donate to a schools NIL fund without that money going to all women’s sports as well.

Gonna completely change the landscape of NIL from here on out. Completely ignorant imo. The sports and athletes generating the most revenue should get the most money. I couldn’t care less what sex they are.
That doesn’t coincide with what congress passed with the NIL Bill. They aren’t getting that money for their Name Image or Likeness, but off that of another person. I don’t see how they can possibly be legally allowed to take money away from those that put the money into the piggy bank.
 
The govt is my customer (multiple agencies) and I have no idea what the Dept of Ed does. They also have no money, so there's that too.
 
But now, they’re stating that all NIL money should be distributed among all sports (they mean just women sports) evenly. So you won’t be able to donate to a schools NIL fund without that money going to all women’s sports as well.
Everyone in this thread is misinterpreting this ruling. It has no bearing on normal NIL money that a player gets. This ruling is specifically referring to the revenue sharing that will now be distributed to the schools to pay players directly. A quarterback making $3 million on an NIL deal with a collective won't be affected by this. It says when schools get a $23 million payout from media deal revenue sharing and players are paid directly it will need to be paid out in a way that complies to Title IX.
 
  • Like
Reactions: megablue
This means absolutely nothing. What the political trolls at the DOE dont understand Iis NIL is personally owned by the athlete. Every athlete is already the same. They each own their personal NIL.

No one, particularly the "state" can take NIL away from anyone. These must be the dumbest clowns on earth.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT