ADVERTISEMENT

This is crazy…Fanstake

Want to buy a player for UK? So, do you commit the same amount to both Ament and Wilson, with the idea that you probably only have to pay one of the two?
 
Don't see it working longterm. That money will likely be a drop in the bucket compared to collectives. I give them credit for a well executed social media campaign though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TM2013 and Fox2monk
From Yahoo! Finance:

Here’s how it works: Using Fanstake, fans can pledge financial support, known as "staking," to promising recruits, transfer players, or current rostered athletes they want to see play for their favorite college team next season. If a fan's "staked" athlete chooses the fan's school, Fanstake strikes an authentic NIL endorsement deal with that player. If the athlete chooses another school, the fan gets their money credited back to their Fanstake account, and the other school’s fanbase contributes to the endorsement deal instead.

Surely there is more to the "money credited back to Fanstake account". If that is literally the case, it means you donate 2k, player doesn't go to your school and you don't get the money back but you CAN donate it again.

Some venture capital huckster thinks he has it all figured out I guess.
 
It’s funny that I’ve seen such negative reactions to this. I actually think this is a good idea.

You say “I want to give Caleb Wilson $100 if he comes to UK”. If he ends up going to a different school you get your money back.

I’d be much more willing to do that, then give a few bucks to a collective blindly. To be clear though, I won’t actually be doing either!
 
From Yahoo! Finance:

Here’s how it works: Using Fanstake, fans can pledge financial support, known as "staking," to promising recruits, transfer players, or current rostered athletes they want to see play for their favorite college team next season. If a fan's "staked" athlete chooses the fan's school, Fanstake strikes an authentic NIL endorsement deal with that player. If the athlete chooses another school, the fan gets their money credited back to their Fanstake account, and the other school’s fanbase contributes to the endorsement deal instead.

Surely there is more to the "money credited back to Fanstake account". If that is literally the case, it means you donate 2k, player doesn't go to your school and you don't get the money back but you CAN donate it again.

Some venture capital huckster thinks he has it all figured out I guess.
Surely you can actually get the money back. I didn’t realize at first that you got your money back at all😆
 
From Yahoo! Finance:

Here’s how it works: Using Fanstake, fans can pledge financial support, known as "staking," to promising recruits, transfer players, or current rostered athletes they want to see play for their favorite college team next season. If a fan's "staked" athlete chooses the fan's school, Fanstake strikes an authentic NIL endorsement deal with that player. If the athlete chooses another school, the fan gets their money credited back to their Fanstake account, and the other school’s fanbase contributes to the endorsement deal instead.

Surely there is more to the "money credited back to Fanstake account". If that is literally the case, it means you donate 2k, player doesn't go to your school and you don't get the money back but you CAN donate it again.

Some venture capital huckster thinks he has it all figured out I guess.
Under this premise, I'd look for late commits, for sure. Seems like as others go elsewhere, the monies held here would trend to the big name recruits, at the same schools, that wait until late to commit...anywhere really but thinking of us as the example, with Wilson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catfan220
Why would a fan give to a player BEFORE he commits to a team?????

Now AFTER he commits to MY school, then it will be open season for a fan.

The fan does not give in advance. The fan commits to a dollar and is only responsible for that payment if the player commits and is on the roster.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk and catben
I grew up watching the Kyle Macy, Kenny "Sky" Walker, King Rex, and Jamal Mashburn, but I have to say I am ready to bulldoze all the stadiums down and let these kids go work at McDonald's for a few years. They are destroying the sport that all these former players poured their heart and soul into.
 
I can’t believe the Presidents of all these institutions aren’t banding together and revolting against this invasion on athletics- which were designed to be a sideline of college. I think they would get tremendous support.
 
This is from last summer and discusses the legal
Classification of SOME college athletes - as employees of the university/state

AP News - June '24

Are they playing for "fun" or are they "playing for pay" with no other benefit provided to the university?


Seems to make the whole landscape even MORE convoluted

Not sure it there have been more recent court rulings or updates to this angle

But if you can hire employees to play basketball -- and you base it on federal/state employment law .....doesn't that open up a lot more types of players as being eligible?

Like a former NBA player who wants to return for a degree maybe?

Any professional Euro player?

Confusing !!!




(Emphasis on the "Con")
 
Since most colleges are state entities might as well just have state teams / larger city teams and such. Has not one thing to do with college and college life. Let these guys be state employees and have a 4 or 5 year contract, if they break contract- go pro they pay a penalty. Otherwise they are at said place for the duration. Then let the state or city own, run, hire and such.

This is no longer college sports and it needs to quit hiding behind said universities.
 
The fan does not give in advance. The fan commits to a dollar and is only responsible for that payment if the player commits and is only a roster.
I think you would have to put the money in upfront however, to be held in escrow, otherwise it would be near-impossible to collect the full amount come commitment.
 
I can’t believe the Presidents of all these institutions aren’t banding together and revolting against this invasion on athletics- which were designed to be a sideline of college. I think they would get tremendous support.
This is the simple answer to NIL.
The NCAA can’t place restrictions on players but the college itself could.
The problem with everything is the minority aspect. If college athletes were 98% white this would have been fixed immediately.
First person to place restrictions will be called racist and anti feminist.
This could easily be fixed by the institutions themselves but they can’t risk being called out as bigots.
 
Last edited:
I think you would have to put the money in upfront however, to be held in escrow, otherwise it would be near-impossible to collect the full amount come commitment.

Sure. You create an account. It’s kind of like how I assume gambling sites function, except you will not be fronted any cash to gain your patronage (potentially addiction).
 
This is the simple answer to NIL.
The NCAA can’t place restrictions on players but the college itself could.

It’s a bypass on collectives. Rather than giving money to a collective so that it can pay the players, you get to put your money toward the player you want to see on your team. It won’t supplant collectives, but is probably more akin to the signing bonus. 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT