The last part is wrong...not the principle of non aggression and coercion. That's correct. You can and even should support Ukraine. Its the real issue, the one that you simply cannot grasp, even with the before mentioned sentence stated over and over and over. That theres nothing in libertarianism that says a 3rd party outside entity should dump their treasure into the conflict, or 3rd party inserting itself to coercing. Real libertarians know that Ukraine and Russia both will lose this. They also know fake libertarians were silent on the aggression and coercion on its ppl during the Ukrainian coup...bc the fake libertarians can just only scream Russia! and think you're creating some false equivalence...they're not, they're just pointing out your principles come and go.Figured you'd call me a jewish hater or something, typical of bible thumpers. And lol at greatest ally. I'd put France and the UK above them.
I'm just saying, stop giving aid to Israel if you're worried about, fighting other wars for other countires, Israel doesn't need it. Your argument holds no water, either you're against foreign aid, or you're not. You don't want to fund Ukraine because fox news told you so. And you support Israel because the bible. If you're worried about US hostages, we have a millitary you know. Think of it this way:
Conservatives view political conflicts as civilization vs. barbarism. Israel represents civilization in the Middle East, so that's who they support. Why you support Israel.
Progressives view political conflicts as oppressor vs. oppressed. The Palestinians are oppressed, so that's who they support.
Libertarians view political conflicts as liberty vs. coercion, why I support Ukraine.
On the other about Israel, their standard of living is higher than the US, they dont need our treasure either, but your question should be should we also be providing said treasure also to the other side who is harboring our citizens whose they've taken aggression against.