We keep hearing of all these buyouts other coaches have. Why are they in play? I mean what am I missing here? Aren't they just like Cal's, if they leave for another job the buyout doesn't apply, correct?
No..these buyouts are ones that the coach owes the university if they leave. Nate Oats has to pay $18 million to get out of his current contract at Alabama. Presumably, his new employer would pay that for him as part of the agreement. So, in this case, UK would pay Alabama $18 million to hire him.We keep hearing of all these buyouts other coaches have. Why are they in play? I mean what am I missing here? Aren't they just like Cal's, if they leave for another job the buyout doesn't apply, correct?
It's a different buyout. That buyout is if Cal was fired without cause. UK would pay him $33 million. If Cal leaves on his own, UK owed him nothing and he owes UK nothing as there was no buyout in his contract similar to what Oats has.So did Arky pay Cal's $33 mil?
It’s my understanding Oats has a $10m buyout. Am I misinformed?It's a different buyout. That buyout is if Cal was fired without cause. UK would pay him $33 million. If Cal leaves on his own, UK owed him nothing and he owes UK nothing as there was no buyout in his contract similar to what Oats has.
From an article:It’s my understanding Oats has a $10m buyout. Am I misinformed?