ADVERTISEMENT

So realistically what will happen?

I’m gonna look at it from a “rest of this year” scenario. We sit at 3-4, with 5 games remaining.

Of those 5, we start off with Auburn this coming weekend at home, and Auburn is just as bad, if not worse than us, so that could very well be a win, if we play similar to earlier. We then go to UT…ass whipping. Then we have a buy week before coming home to Murray State. We realistically could be 4-5 here, so we should end up at 5-5 after this game. Then we travel to Texas…ass whipping. So we come home against Louisville, maybe at 5-6, needing that win for 6 and bowl eligibility. They have a high powered offense, but overall their defense is awful, and they’re especially horrible against the run, and a running QB, which fits right into Mark’s 3 yards and a cloud of dust scheme. Say we win this and end up 6-6…we go to yet another low-tier, crappy bowl game, and we end up winning that and finish 7-6.

Big question is…THEN WHAT??? Will they do something about a change, or will that buy him yet another year of mediocrity?
The money says he'll get another year of mediocrity regardless. Only chance is if he departs willingly like Cal did.
 
That would be the best option at this point. Got to have a dynamic QB from the portal and a much more creative OC.
I think the oc we have is good we need to get rid of control freak stoops reminder it's no coincidence all the ocs that leave here really Excell stoops has got to go
 
To answer the question here is what is realistically going to happen. Nothing. We'll get a bunch of I'm mad, we gotta get to work, look at these good recruit, we're putting in the work, buy my bourbon, we've got a great team but we play in the SEC and the schedule is hard interviews. We get hopes up, win a couple cupcakes, get beat in the SEC rinse repeat.
 
i won't get into UK needing a new coach that's for UK supporters to decide. But I will say this, CMS did what it took to keep his teams in games by running the offense he did, he created an environment of playing with a chip on its shoulder, all needed in the beginning, but as talent has gotten better I don't think he can or is not willing to adapt to better talent and a more aggressive offense. I am not trying to be negative towards CMS, I just believe if there is a CMS downfall it is him not adapting to UK's talent level and today's tendencies.
I can not agree more Grumpy. I think UK's situation is now a lot like Georgia's was when Kirby Smart was hired. We all know the results of that change. Mark Richt did a good job at Georgia - but sometimes it's time for a change for the good of the program. Georgia had Kirby doing his thing at Alabama and made the right move. The closest thing we have to Kirby is Jon. It's time for UK to make the move - the goal line is just going to keep getting further and further away if we don't.

It will not be easy - and I remember the first year's of Kirby's at Georgia. Georgia is now a completely different team than the first couple of Kirby's teams. I hope and feel confident Jon would do the same at UK - with reasonable fan expectations.

Go Big Blue!
 
I think UK's situation is now a lot like Georgia's was when Kirby Smart was hired.

This is true.

Like Mark Richt, Stoops has some pretty good seasons, but as they recede into the rear-view mirror, they don’t mean near as much.

Stoops will get next year for certain: no way we pony up in excess of 35 million with the new revenue sharing likely to cost just as much, next season.

Chop about 18 million off the buyout, and it becomes far more likely, post-2025.

And the Smart hiring was of a young coach: he was 40 years old when hired.

Jon Sumrall is 42 years old, today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farsight
Stoops has earn more than 1 losing season with no bowl game, if just going by that.

I do think we have a losing season, Auburn Loss, UT loss, Texas Loss, Murray win, Louisville Loss. We cannot score enough to win those games. Our defense might put us in close games but come up short. 4-8 is where we are right now. 5-7 would be the best we could do I think.
 
Realistically what will happen is that Stoops won’t change anything and he will coach the next 2 years. Nothing I have seen has shown he thinks he has a philosophy problem. He is coaching the same way today that he did on day one.
This and lack of discipline are massive issues.

This is what sets Saban and others apart. Saban had a philosophy issue at bama that didn't fit with their QB's last skill set. So what did Saban do? Decided to change his philosophy in the middle of the season and they won a title.

Stoops is too stubborn. Its sad.
 
Well, I'm repeating myself from another thread but I think we'll see a 4 or 5 win season this year and next year the offense will improve but the defense will suck and we'll win 3-4 games next year and then Stoops will be gone in some way. Nothing good will happen for UK football before the 2026 or 2027 season, and only then if Barny hires a better coach but he seems to prefer walking cliches instead of football coaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ok-cats-computer
Stoops has earn more than 1 losing season with no bowl game, if just going by that.

Well, whether earned, or necessitated by the huge buyout (and one could argue that is really the same thing), it ain’t going to happen post-2024.

In the meanwhile, I hope for at least a 6-6, not because it makes a huge difference. . . but with a 9 bowl game streak, I think Iowa stays in play for a golden parachute.
 
No one has really answered your question. I’m not sure I can either. But it’s very close to 50/50 that stoops puts his head down and really goes to work to fix this shit for next season…..or he decides to move on/retire.
I think it is more like 33%, your 2 options and I’m going with the 3rd option of Stoops talking about changes but doing what he always does coaching wise. I think he is like Cal and doesn’t really know how to change things up, he thinks because we won 10 games a few times before he can do the same thing every year with different players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justwantadecentteam
This will be a losing season and no bowl game most likely. Fans are getting tired of year in year out disappointments. We recruit middle of the road SEC players and have no chance of ever seeing the playoffs but have one of the highest paid coaches in America with a long term contract. Is there any hope left for UK football. Dedicated and loyal ticket holders deserve better. Fans everywhere deserve better.
So if we are this bad but don't pay a coach very much then it's okay? That seems to be your point. So let's just get a cheap coach.
 
This is true.

Like Mark Richt, Stoops has some pretty good seasons, but as they recede into the rear-view mirror, they don’t mean near as much.

Stoops will get next year for certain: no way we pony up in excess of 35 million with the new revenue sharing likely to cost just as much, next season.

Chop about 18 million off the buyout, and it becomes far more likely, post-2025.

And the Smart hiring was of a young coach: he was 40 years old when hired.

Jon Sumrall is 42 years old, today.
Yes Hack - Kirby was 40 and Jon is the right age to make this move. We don;t want to hire a 60 plus year old guy who would be with us for 5 years or so. Jon, would more than likely be a decade to retirement type hire - if he was successful as most of us believe he would be. But lets think about this money thing a little bit. Buyout price and contract price COULD actually be two different things. Another thing could be paying $9 million a year while hiring a guy for $5 million is in reality not a 45 million buyout cost. What is the cost of money - $3 million income off from keeping 45 million in the bank. So, the net cost would be $6 million to buy him out per year long term. So, the net cost to hire Jon might be 6 million buyout cost plus 5 million to Jon, so total cost of coach becomes $11 million instead of $9 million. So, does 2 million a year seem like a reasonable deal to change coaches?

Many other approaches to consider and what the actual net affect of the buyout would be. If we keep Stoops and lose 10, 000 fans in the seats for 7 home games - how much is that cost? I would say at least $1 million per game! The loss of 10,000 tickets would pay the entire buyout cost!

Plus maybe Stoops is getting tired of all of this and realizes he can go out a legend and a hero. What is that worth to him long run in terms of other potential good will and income? Anyway - we can all come up with our opinions - these decisions are not in anyone's hands but UK's administration. The decision needs to be based on what is good for UK long term - not short term! Short term thinking is why our football program has lost $100's of millions of dollars over the last 50 years!

If you don;t think I am correct then look at the other schools with the huge stadiums filled up with fans paying double what UK charges? Fans will pay to see a winner. Here's a fact for you. I sat in the end zone of Florida's 90,000 seat stadium this weekend - game was listed as a sellout - last weekend. Those tickets, purchased thru UK, were $125 each. My UK season ticket price on the 30 yard line are $56 for the Auburn game. HMM - now take 30,000 extra seats at $125 per game and that is $ 3,75 million for one game! Then add in 60,000 tickets at $70 more = that is $4.2 million dollars. That's almost $8 million per home game more money just from ticket sales! Plus all the concession money! Keeping it simple - that is about $60 million a year in lost ticket revenue! If UK had just committed to football decades ago how much money would the program have to make changes and do things differently? This is why you can;t think short term! If you know you are going to make a change - you don't wait - waiting cost even more money and creates more bad feelings as well!

Go Big Blue!
 
Just got in from some errands. Has Stoops resigned yet? 🙏🙏🤞🤞
For Stoops to resign that would be an offensive move on his part. He has no idea how to generate offensive move. He is defensive minded. He is waiting to be fired, he knows how to handle the defensive side. lol
 
In my opinion Stoops is back next year. Beyond that who knows. I think Hamden needs to go and we need to go get a high profile OC, with a clause that gives that person full control of the offense.
I think Wolford needs to go as OL as well.
We need to go hit the portal very hard for several OL. No offense to the current players
I don't believe Vandergriff or Wimsatt will be back.
Either give Boley a 100% chance next year or go get a high profile QB.
I just think that Hamden is not adapting or making any adjustments to help. He's way over his head.
After hearing of the death of Stoops mother this morning, I think that may have been a big part of the problem too. I've been thru that with both of my parents, and was very hard on me and my siblings. It took away my focus from other things in my life.
If he fails in 2025, no doubt it's time for a change.
I know I was all for Stoops being fired, but after calling down and looking at the overall picture , I think he deserves 1 more year.
We also need to make coaching changes on the defensive side. Mike Stoops and Buffalo need to go.
I read the article about Woodyard the other day.
Would be a great hire. He seems to my age the same passion and allegiance to UK as our new head basketball coach.
Maybe reassign Marrow to a full-time recruiting coordinator as well.
Bring on Conrad as the tight end coach, he also seems to have the passion for UK.
I know he, and Woodyard are inexperienced, but
they would bring a certain passion, desire back. And I think that's what we need.
Let's finish this season strong, and build a great future.
Sorry for the ramble
Just my humble opinion as a long time UK football fan.

GI BIG BLUE

PS. As I type this I watching Paul Finebaum listening to all the AL fans that want their coach
fired. It's brutal.😂😂😂
 
If I had to put money on it, I think he's back next year, but it's his last. He will either have a decent season and go out in better shape than this year or he will have another poor season and he will call it quits or negotiate a buyout.
 
This will be a losing season and no bowl game most likely. Fans are getting tired of year in year out disappointments. We recruit middle of the road SEC players and have no chance of ever seeing the playoffs but have one of the highest paid coaches in America with a long term contract. Is there any hope left for UK football. Dedicated and loyal ticket holders deserve better. Fans everywhere deserve better.
So to answer the question what happens, obviously nothing until the end of the season if then. Stoops continuing here as head coach will most probably depend on how the season finishes both w/l wise and on-field performance, and how the fans base, donors and administration react to that. In short if Stoops limbs to the finish line with 4 or maybe 5 wins, and receives a cold reception going forwarding knowing the fan support, funding and NIL will be reduced significantly, then the most likely thing is a negotiated buyout. But again it depends on how the season finishes if he can pick up the pieces and show some significant progress maybe beating a UT or Texas on their home turf, then there is no way he heads for the exits.

As much as fans would like to know the future now, at this stage it's just speculation.
 
We don’t need a tight ends coach. The o line coach can teach them to block. They never get passes. Stoops just needs to go and it doesn’t matter how he leaves. My group will not be going to another game until he is gone. This has been a severely disappointing season.
 
I know he, and Woodyard are inexperienced, but
they would bring a certain passion, desire back. And I think that's what we need.

I love WW as much as any Cat fan does, and would hope he could join our staff.

But when you have an experienced option or two who have proven their chops as a Head Coach, I do not think Woodward will be considered for the top spot.
 
I can not agree more Grumpy. I think UK's situation is now a lot like Georgia's was when Kirby Smart was hired. We all know the results of that change. Mark Richt did a good job at Georgia - but sometimes it's time for a change for the good of the program. Georgia had Kirby doing his thing at Alabama and made the right move. The closest thing we have to Kirby is Jon. It's time for UK to make the move - the goal line is just going to keep getting further and further away if we don't.

It will not be easy - and I remember the first year's of Kirby's at Georgia. Georgia is now a completely different team than the first couple of Kirby's teams. I hope and feel confident Jon would do the same at UK - with reasonable fan expectations.

Go Big Blue!

I liked Richt, I think hexwas one of the best men in college athletics. He was intense and fired competitor his first 5-6 years, then his wife become sick and his priorities noticeably changed. Really have to admire his dedication to his family. His last couple years he just looked tired, turned out he had Parkinson's. Good man, got dealth some bad cards, but he had lost the fire and SEC head coach has to have. Kirby was a big gamble, he made some mistakes, but learned pretty quick. UK will be making a big bet too if it changes, but the rewards can be pretty sweet if you win.
 
After thinking on it I believe there is a real good chance Stoops will want to leave after this year if he gets an offer. He has to know his defense will go downhill a lot next season and he'll likely have a bad year and get bought out. So maybe he'd want to coach somewhere easier to win...
 
This will be a losing season and no bowl game most likely. Fans are getting tired of year in year out disappointments. We recruit middle of the road SEC players and have no chance of ever seeing the playoffs but have one of the highest paid coaches in America with a long term contract. Is there any hope left for UK football. Dedicated and loyal ticket holders deserve better. Fans everywhere deserve better.
Not much hope really. His salary is a problem obviously but the biggest thing is the perception of UK in the SEC. People (and I mean top recruits) just don't view UK as a destination, trust me I've coached several of them. Best outcome would be for The Iowa or FSU coach to resign and one of those schools come after him. He is a good coach that has hit his ceiling here and will do well at either of those schools.
 
Stoops had this program on the rise until the portal and NIL really kicked in. There’s no good data immediately available as far as I know. But is UK football really competitive at an SEC level with NIL? It’s probably not going to matter a whole lot who the coach is if the answer to that question is “no”.
 
Stoops had this program on the rise until the portal and NIL really kicked in. There’s no good data immediately available as far as I know. But is UK football really competitive at an SEC level with NIL? It’s probably not going to matter a whole lot who the coach is if the answer to that question is “no”.
He may not like it or be good at it or want to participate. And I’m sympathetic with his point that his ad doesn’t really help him much with it. But to look up and see Vandy and Indiana and such doing fine by making staff changes I’m not throwing up any white flags to nil. I mean sc doesn’t have tons of nil they’re reasonably young this year by todays standards and mauled us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ok-cats-computer
He may not like it or be good at it or want to participate. And I’m sympathetic with his point that his ad doesn’t really help him much with it. But to look up and see Vandy and Indiana and such doing fine by making staff changes I’m not throwing up any white flags to nil. I mean sc doesn’t have tons of nil they’re reasonably young this year by todays standards and mauled us.
I’ll admit I really don’t know squat about Indiana. But are you telling me they’ve gone from 3-9 to 8-0 without significant upgrades to the roster?
 
I’ll admit I really don’t know squat about Indiana. But are you telling me they’ve gone from 3-9 to 8-0 without significant upgrades to the roster?
Yeah they’ve had a ton of turnover but they aren’t rolling out gobs of nil and none of their guys were big time portal guys. A few of the coaches guys came from jmu in the sunbelt and other guys weren’t some obvious studs in the portal. Which is an argument for why people shouldn’t be scared when a change does come. Only fear it if we don’t get a competent coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gojvc
Being a coach is taxing. There’s a reason he’s the longest tenured coach in the league. Other than the truly exceptional ones, most can’t keep a program moving forward for 13+ years. I appreciate coach stoops. He’s shown it’s possible to win here. Time for something different tho
 
I think with the buyout issue at 36-40 million, he’s here at least until the end of next season.

Two oddly related occurrences fast approach: Kirk Ferentz will turn 70 this year, and will likely establish the Big Ten record for total wins, by season’s end. Neither are guarantees of his retirement, but might bring it about. Stoops haters think Iowa would pass on him, but just like the Calipari situation, the view from the outside is different.

Stoops retains national respect for elevating a program higher than well-respected Coaches Brooks and Claiborne elevated it.
Remember when the fans were down in Joker we lost twenty thousand season ticket holders who mostly never cam back. We used to advertise 70 thousand strong . Then reduced capacity of the stadium to make it not look so bad . Say we only lose ten to fifteen thousand fans next season if he stays . What Is that worth when you consider extra contributions to Kfund . He must go .
 
Stoops had this program on the rise until the portal and NIL really kicked in. There’s no good data immediately available as far as I know. But is UK football really competitive at an SEC level with NIL? It’s probably not going to matter a whole lot who the coach is if the answer to that question is “no”.
I really don’t think it has anything to do with NIL. We kept our roster together more than just about any other team, and we brought in several players from big programs that we thought would be difference makers.

Where we screwed up is not putting more money into the O line/hiring a bad O line coach, and BVG and chip traynam being complete and total wastes of money. The money itself wasn’t the issue, we put it in the wrong areas and got very unlucky with where we did put it.

If lack of money was really a problem, we’d have lost deon or Maxwell or Barion or Dane. After this year though I could see money being a problem cause the donors certainly didn’t get any ROI.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack and gojvc
Stoops isn't going anywhere unless he wants to. My opinion hasn't changed.

Gonna need a lot more NIL to compete in modern and expanded sec.

Indiana is a goofy comparison. They play their first top 25 opponent in game 11 this season. UK or any sec team has usually played 3 or 4 by then if not 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Hack
Stoops isn't going anywhere unless he wants to. My opinion hasn't changed.

Gonna need a lot more NIL to compete in modern and expanded sec.

Indiana is a goofy comparison. They play their first top 25 opponent in game 11 this season. UK or any sec team has usually played 3 or 4 by then if not 5.
We have played 2 top 25 teams and we beat one of them lmao

Our schedule has barely been harder than theirs. We still have 2 more 30+ point beat downs coming. We are now 0-4 against unranked SEC teams, so your point doesn’t make a lot of sense regarding Indiana.
 
We have played 2 top 25 teams and we beat one of them lmao

Our schedule has barely been harder than theirs. We still have 2 more 30+ point beat downs coming
This is reality for the Kentucky Football program. Beat teams like Murray State, hope to get lucky, get luck to beat an awful SEC team which isn't given after tonight's dismal performance and upset a good school like Ole Miss once in a while.
 
Stoops isn't going anywhere unless he wants to. My opinion hasn't changed.

Gonna need a lot more NIL to compete in modern and expanded sec.

Indiana is a goofy comparison. They play their first top 25 opponent in game 11 this season. UK or any sec team has usually played 3 or 4 by then if not 5.
We can judge teams by relating a team to other conferences but not coaches. I mean we recruit as well as we do because we are in the sec. We recruit like sec and play in the sec. They are t playing elite teams and they don’t have elite players by credential anyway. No, Indy isn’t having to play the highest end schedule but it’s not like he’s playing it with elite reputation players. Guys from jmu coming over, etc. so he’s playing against what he plays against with similar players. And that’s doing a good job. Whether those players could compete against the sec isn’t really relevant in assessing the job he does or not.
 
We have played 2 top 25 teams and we beat one of them lmao

Our schedule has barely been harder than theirs. We still have 2 more 30+ point beat downs coming. We are now 0-4 against unranked SEC teams, so your point doesn’t make a lot of sense regarding Indiana.

I'm not saying we can't go 6 and 6 or 7 and 5. My point is you aren't making the playoff and going 11 and 1 at UK. And UK will end up playing 4 top 10 teams this season.

IU is gonna go 11 and 1 and not beat a top 25 team.

No one is arguing Stoops needs replaced but barnie won't do it. I'm just saying the next guy won't win anything that matters. He should be able to win some sec home games and win 7 or 8 games some seasons.
 
I'm not saying we can't go 6 and 6 or 7 and 5. My point is you aren't making the playoff and going 11 and 1 at UK. And UK will end up playing 4 top 10 teams this season.

IU is gonna go 11 and 1 and not beat a top 25 team.

No one is arguing Stoops needs replaced but barnie won't do it. I'm just saying the next guy won't win anything that matters. He should be able to win some sec home games and win 7 or 8 games some seasons.
its just not that simple. It’s not that Barnhart won’t do it, he got conned into signing another calipari contract and he can’t afford to pay him 44 million dollars to not coach.
 
We can judge teams by relating a team to other conferences but not coaches. I mean we recruit as well as we do because we are in the sec. We recruit like sec and play in the sec. They are t playing elite teams and they don’t have elite players by credential anyway. No, Indy isn’t having to play the highest end schedule but it’s not like he’s playing it with elite reputation players. Guys from jmu coming over, etc. so he’s playing against what he plays against with similar players. And that’s doing a good job. Whether those players could compete against the sec isn’t really relevant in assessing the job he does or not.
The Vandy coach is playing in the SEC and all their games in the SEC has been respectable, even the ones they lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildcatjedi
The Vandy coach is playing in the SEC and all their games in the SEC has been respectable, even the ones they lost.
Yep. My point is we can’t say cignetti, or whomever, can’t do it in the sec with their curent team and use that to say that means they can’t build something sec
 
I don’t think CMS wants to be here anymore. His heart just isn’t in it.
He won’t be fired. I think something might be negotiated. Or he may just leave. As bad as this sucks for us, I can’t imagine it’s any better for him. He looks like a heart attack waiting to happen. He and his family are set financially. The money he would be walking away isn’t worth what another year of this would mean to his mental and potentially physical health. He should take a year or 2 to decide what he does want to do. I just really don’t think he will be back next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23jumpboy
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT