Sensationalism? If you can find anything in the story that isn't accurate then feel free to correct me on it. The issues with Skal are obvious at this point. I didn't write the kid off. He still has plenty of time to progress but he's going to receive criticism after the way he played yesterday but more so for the last four or five games. It has to be a concern at this point.No offense but this story is written as if Skal is a druggie. This team may mature late in the process. Maybe a lot later this season than normal but I bet he DOES make a positive impact for UK THIS season before it's over. Why do I sound so confident? CAL!!! He hasn't missed very often. He brings out the best in his players most of the time. Skal is too decent of a kid to not rise to the occasion. It may take him a while but my money is on the fact that he will be what Cal thinks he is at the end. What I ask is that you spend as much sensationalism at that point as you are using now. If so you can be considered fair and objective.
I don't think there's any chance he stays beyond this year. That's why fans are impatient. We know he's gone.If he needs time so be it. I have no problem seeing Skal mature with 2-3 more years. The mind set has changed of fans and it appears people want to see top 5 picks every year bolt for the league. Let's give this kid a chance to develop and support him during his time as a CAT!
It's kentucky Vitale ranted how we are not good as we throttled a solid ASU team we manhandled Duke. It's the whole hoping UK fails agenda. Skai is struggling but what about guys like Lee Poythress and Willis stepping up. I've watched all the top teams and UK is more talented and younger than them all. I love this teams chances.If he needs time so be it. I have no problem seeing Skal mature with 2-3 more years. The mind set has changed of fans and it appears people want to see top 5 picks every year bolt for the league. Let's give this kid a chance to develop and support him during his time as a CAT!
Poor article.
I still contend that if this kid is going to reach his potential, he must be on the floor. That'll cause the Lee and Willis fan bois some heart burn. If he doesn't get the minutes, then yes, he's a project.
I don't think there's any chance he stays beyond this year. That's why fans are impatient. We know he's gone.
I don't think it's time to hit the panic button yet. On the contrary I think yesterday can do more good for Skal than a mediocre performance. It's a long season and Skal will figure things out.
Please
The only NBA team I can see drafting Skal at this point is the 76ers.
Sensationalism? If you can find anything in the story that isn't accurate then feel free to correct me on it. The issues with Skal are obvious at this point. I didn't write the kid off. He still has plenty of time to progress but he's going to receive criticism after the way he played yesterday but more so for the last four or five games. It has to be a concern at this point.
If he starts playing well then he'll undoubtedly have stories written about him saying as much. I appreciate the feedback.
If Skal is willing to stick around Lexington and improve his game, he has my support 100% (and I'm sure most fans feel the exact same). But, if he's willing to skip out as a late first or second round pick, then best of luck but don't except everyone to love you going out the door. I get the AD's, MKG's and Walls leaving after one year.If he needs time so be it. I have no problem seeing Skal mature with 2-3 more years. The mind set has changed of fans and it appears people want to see top 5 picks every year bolt for the league. Let's give this kid a chance to develop and support him during his time as a CAT!
If Skal is willing to stick around Lexington and improve his game, he has my support 100% (and I'm sure most fans feel the exact same). But, if he's willing to skip out as a late first or second round pick, then best of luck but don't except everyone to love you going out the door. I get the AD's, MKG's and Walls leaving after one year.
So do you see Skal as being where he needs to be? There are very few freshmen in college who aren't projects, we have been spoiled by those. Yes, Skal showed the potential he has by scoring 26 points but he has also showed why he is being labeled as a project by some in more than one game this season. If you would've read the article you would see that 80% of it was quotes by either players or coaches.Didn't read the article. I've attended one game thus far this year, the NJIT game. What the OP labeled as a "project" scored 26 points that night. "Projects" don't score 26 points in an NCAA game. Do better OP.
Maybe had something to do with playing NJIT. He scored more that single game than he has the last four games combined. It's not all about points though. He's the fifth leading rebounder on the team (as the center). Tyler Ulis has one less rebound than him and Ulis didn't play against Illinois State.Didn't read the article. I've attended one game thus far this year, the NJIT game. What the OP labeled as a "project" scored 26 points that night. "Projects" don't score 26 points in an NCAA game. Do better OP.
This is what Cal has to say about Skal or the "project" to which you refer to him as:Maybe had something to do with playing NJIT. He scored more that single game than he has the last four games combined. It's not all about points though. He's the fifth leading rebounder on the team (as the center). Tyler Ulis has one less rebound than him and Ulis didn't play against Illinois State.
Project is used for lack of a better word. I don't want to call him a bust because he's played 10 games. He has a lot of time to turn it around. But he has a really long way to go and certainly hasn't been what he was projected to be at this point (i.e. potential No. 1 pick).
According to Rivals' stats, Skal is averaging 10 pts./4 rebs. in his first 10 college games. Towns averaged 9 pts./7 rebs in his first 10 games. Was KAT where he was projected to be? Also, Ben Simmons is projected to he the No.1 pick by nearly all services including Chad Ford.But he hasn't been what he was projected to be at this point (i.e. potential No. 1 pick).
If he needs time so be it. I have no problem seeing Skal mature with 2-3 more years. The mind set has changed of fans and it appears people want to see top 5 picks every year bolt for the league. Let's give this kid a chance to develop and support him during his time as a CAT!
Was wondering the same thing...If Skal sat out from basketball so long, why was he ranked #1 by rivals and #2 by ESPN?
It's time to consider Skal Labissiere as a project after scoring zero points, grabbing zero rebounds and committing five fouls against Arizona State on Saturday.
STORY
Why are some of you so offended by the idea of Skal being a project? What has he done to suggest he isn't? He's played one great half all year. The rest of the time he's been average to unplayable.
So are you basing it on his Rivals ranking? Cliff Alexander was 4th last year. Chris Walker was 6th the year before. Shabazz was No. 1 in 2012 and Ricardo Ledo was 6th. Austin Rivers was No. 1 in 2011. Josh Selby was No. 1 in 2010. Jordan Hamilton was No. 6 in 2009 and Michael Snear was No. 7. The point is, Rivals gets it wrong with Top 10 players - a lot.
There's really no track record to suggest Skal isn't a project. He barely played in high school, and when he did it was against subpar competition. As coaches like to say, what he's put on film to this point doesn't lie. He apparently was very good during practice at the Hoops Summit, but we have no idea the level of intensity at those practices - and the intensity of the game is exactly what Skal is struggling with. He's either not playing as hard as other guys, or he simply isn't physically strong enough to handle them. If it's the first, then that's hard to fix. If it's the latter, that's the very definition of a project.
Maybe had something to do with playing NJIT. He scored more that single game than he has the last four games combined. It's not all about points though. He's the fifth leading rebounder on the team (as the center). Tyler Ulis has one less rebound than him and Ulis didn't play against Illinois State.
Project is used for lack of a better word. I don't want to call him a bust because he's played 10 games. He has a lot of time to turn it around. But he has a really long way to go and certainly hasn't been what he was projected to be at this point (i.e. potential No. 1 pick).
If Skal sat out from basketball so long, why was he ranked #1 by rivals and #2 by ESPN?
All you homers calling for Skal to get more time are morons. He fouls too much to stay on the floor by jumping for every single pump fake within 10 feet of him. Hell, against ASU he had 0 pts. 0 rebounds in 13 minutes before fouling out. His effort is poor and his motor is that of an elderly person.