My thoughts were this after reading:
Agreed, just think they should both be lower a bit. Think they should Scott Drew and Mark Few higher.Having Izzo over Cal in my opinion is crazy
Both have one title, Izzo has what 8-9 final fours. Cal has 6 with one title.Having Izzo over Cal in my opinion is crazy
Who's triggered? Seems like everyone has been pretty calm.I knew this would be sure to trigger some folks. So far it has not disappointed.
I’ll def check back on this often for the entertainment value.
you must be to young to remember Dean SmithSorry...he shouldn't be ranked anything close to that. Never has a coach squandered so much talent and got nothing out of it. He hasn't cared about coaching for years and his concern has really only been getting guys to the NBA as quickly as possible, no matter what the cost to his program. That's not a top tier coach.
Cal owns pitino head to head. Say what you want but the facts don't lie.I thought that was a little high. The younger Cal maybe at 3 but not now. Also no way should Cal be ranked higher than Pitino.
Roy Williams has 3 titles to his name and no longer coaches.you must be to young to remember Dean Smith
you can also say that about Roy Williams
I agree with all this.Top 3 is wayyyyy too high. But he also isnt one of the like bottom of the barrel P5 coaches as I have read on here in the past. I would rank him around the 12-15 range.
One could say Rick Barnes owns Cal but that dont say muchCal owns pitino head to head. Say what you want but the facts don't lie.
New efficient offense. The more you yell, the more they do, at least in theory! Cal must not be loud enough.#3 at what?
Running GOOOOOOOOO and RUUUUUUUUUN
Hasn't been as entertaining as in March when people wanted to burn his house down (hyperbole!), calm post for sureWho's triggered? Seems like everyone has been pretty calm.
Top 3 is wayyyyy too high. But he also isnt one of the like bottom of the barrel P5 coaches as I have read on here in the past. I would rank him around the 12-15 range.
What would your top 10 look like guys? Just curious to see what your thoughts are.I agree with all this.
By UK standards, Cal is not close to being up-to-par, but heck yeah, he’s still top 15.
If they did these rankings between 2009-2015, he’s easily top 3.
But, if he was still at Memphis and performed the way he has since the 2015 Wisconsin loss, he wouldn't be considered top 15. He’s getting a bump because he’s coaching at UK.
The real question is, can Calipari get his mojo back? Can he recapture what he was from 09-15? If he did that, he would own college basketball and probably own Lexington.
Had the same exact reaction! I was dying laughing (and relieved).I'm laughing at myself. I read the post title and thought someone fell and hit their head thinking it was all coaches...then clicked the link and saw that it was current coaches. Calipari is up there in the current crop of coaches.
The list in your OP is very good. While I think Cal is better than Altman, I would add other coaches to the list in front of Cal.What would your top 10 look like guys? Just curious to see what your thoughts are.
This is the truth, until proven otherwise he isn’t even top 10 now. He doesn’t beat good teams often enough, and we don’t go far in the tournament.There are 2 versions of Cal:
First version: 2009-2015
Second version: 2016-2023
The first version of Cal is 3rd behind K and Roy, which is really respectable. Dude had fire and motivation back then, he was awesome.
The second version of Cal isn't a top 10 coach. He's had more talent than anyone else in college ball, but he has severely underperformed. He can get talent, he just isn't a good coach for today's game.
He's probably the same guy who makes fun of the left in the comments of every single Yahoo article. It just reads way too similarly.Who's triggered? Seems like everyone has been pretty calm.
The same crop of coaches that continue to take his lunch or do something significant in the postseason?I'm laughing at myself. I read the post title and thought someone fell and hit their head thinking it was all coaches...then clicked the link and saw that it was current coaches. Calipari is up there in the current crop of coaches.
If a 3 game lead in head to head is "owns" yes, one could indeed say that.One could say Rick Barnes owns Cal but that dont say much
Yep. His record since the 'lifetime contract' is embarrassing.This is the truth, until proven otherwise he isn’t even top 10 now. He doesn’t beat good teams often enough, and we don’t go far in the tournament.
Then why is Cal doing it?People just don’t seem to want to understand that all the talent he gets here hasn’t matured yet. It’s not like you can expect NBA Booker at 17-18.
Great point. Overlook that A LOT...People just don’t seem to want to understand that all the talent he gets here hasn’t matured yet. It’s not like you can expect NBA Booker at 17-18.
Good response. Lot to think about for sure. Cal is def. a player first coach, and his only goal is to get them drafted.Then why is Cal doing it?
I've never gotten an answer from anyone on these questions.
Since duke won in 2015, how many freshmen have you seen in the FF that played key starting roles?
Cal has had multiple 5* freshmen on every team he has had here, he has 1 title, yet he keeps fielding young teams, then using youth as an excuse. Why does he keep doing it? Seems like the only benefit is bragging rights with regards to the amount of draft picks he can claim.
You can't use inexperience and youth as an excuse for losing, when that is the roster you choose to have.
In my opinion, it looks to me like winning isn't a top priority, it's a nice thing if it happens, but the goal is to get highly rated kids drafted, because apparently they wouldn’t get drafted if they went anywhere else.
Meanwhile, guys like Self, Wright and Drew are developing 2, 3 and 4 star kids, getting some of them drafted AND winning recent titles in the process.
Got lackadaisical after that contract? I think he did.Yep. His record since the 'lifetime contract' is embarrassing.
People just don’t seem to want to understand that all the talent he gets here hasn’t matured yet. It’s not like you can expect NBA Booker at 17-18.