I agree, Auburn is right next door to Georgia and Georgia is a very fertile recruiting ground for the Tigers.
I don't think the West is really superior to the East, rather I think Alabama is so much better than any other program that everyone wants to run from them, and for good reason. The Tide was 13-0 last season while the next best record in the West was 8-4. LSU just replaced their coach and Arkansas, Ole Miss and A&M all have coaches on the hot seat. Two of the seven West teams failed to make a bowl. That doesn't sound to me like a dominant division that should be "weakened" by shuffling some East teams over there in exchange.
Also I agree with BlueRaider regarding the historical ups and downs of teams. Kentucky is moving on a strong trend upward and is essentially a middle tier SEC team now IMO, which helps the East as well.
I don't think the West is really superior to the East, rather I think Alabama is so much better than any other program that everyone wants to run from them, and for good reason. The Tide was 13-0 last season while the next best record in the West was 8-4. LSU just replaced their coach and Arkansas, Ole Miss and A&M all have coaches on the hot seat. Two of the seven West teams failed to make a bowl. That doesn't sound to me like a dominant division that should be "weakened" by shuffling some East teams over there in exchange.
Also I agree with BlueRaider regarding the historical ups and downs of teams. Kentucky is moving on a strong trend upward and is essentially a middle tier SEC team now IMO, which helps the East as well.
Exactly. All these things go in cycles.I remember just a few short years ago before Saban got to Bama, the west was all hot garbage and the SEC had Florida, UT and UGA leading the way.
All you have to do is drive around the state of Georgia and see the AU on Georgia plates. Only Georgia has more vanity license plates than Auburn. Their presence is indeed huge in the state. I never thought of Bama and Auburn both coming to the East. That would shake things up.Auburn wouldn't have a football team if not for Georgia kids, its closer to half the state than Athens is, add that to 1000's of AU alumni who are native Georgians and the ones who moved to Georgia for work, they have a huge presence in the state. A bigger presence than any other P5 school including GT. It was mentioned briefly at the meeting, nothing happening in the realignment front in the next few years. When it and if it happens don't be shocked if Bama doesn't come with them. You know the other members of the west will vote 5-0 to swap AU and Bama for Vandy and Missouri. That would put all the old time rival games in the same divisions, we could then rotate 2 teams from opposite divisions every year. The 1 rotating was to keep all those old rival games who ended up in different divisions, namely UGA-AU and Bama-UT. It would also allow some that were forced to stop because of the split to resume, AU-UF, AU-UT were also long playing rival games.
All you have to do is drive around the state of Georgia and see the AU on Georgia plates. Only Georgia has more vanity license plates than Auburn. Their presence is indeed huge in the state. I never thought of Bama and Auburn both coming to the East. That would shake things up.
Does realignment require unanimity, super majority, or simple majority? Does anyone know for certain?
Exactly. All these things go in cycles.
Thanks. An old (2014-2015) copy of the bylaws I dug up online suggests 2/3 majority to add a member, but simple majority to realign divisions. Not sure about the present, however.I don't know, but before expansion 4 votes could keep a team from becoming a member, UF, UGA, USC and UK had a gentlemen's agreement to ensure, FSU, CLemson, GT and Louisville wouldn't get in. That was when the ACC was struggling to keep up financially, they are paying a pretty nice sum to members now I think. So, sounds like it was at least a 66% to get something done, so, 9 or 10 votes to make a move like realignment?