Who played better in the UCLA game? Poythress was terrible and I thought Willis outplayed him in pretty much every category. .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2885/a28853eba857187fb3df235612720a1d681c425f" alt="incredibly-stupid.gif"
Who played better in the UCLA game? Poythress was terrible and I thought Willis outplayed him in pretty much every category. .
UMMMM. IDK thats what everyone does? Scouts grade college players based on their production in college.
Willis couldn't match Young's college production either.
Some people want Willis to be something hes not.
Actually we extended our lead faster with Willis in the game last night. Not always the case though. And he kept his man in front of him for the most part.Not even close to true
Yes it is a mixture of both. Sure they will draft the 7 footer based on potential. But if it was solely based on potential why is Skal dropping? Why did Shabazz drop? Why even watch the games at all? You can see everything you need to know about potential at the combines. Surley you do not think whatever they do on the college level is meaninglessYou talking about NBA scouts? They grade players based on their college production? Really? Wow man. They grade on potential. If they graded on college production we wouldnt have half of the guys going to the league from UK. Production? Amazing. How much did Orton produce? Dakari Johnson? Come on, surely you are better than this.
We are better on offense with him in the game...thats what i said and that is not debateable
Actually, that is highly debatable, IMHO. Show us some stats to back up you claim.
Ask and you shall receive........P.S. This is not about who is the best total player.
Willis..........2nd on team in 3pt shooting
Willis..........100% in FT 8-8
Willis..........only 4 to's in 104 mins..you do the math
Willis..........tied for 4th in assists....with limited mins
On defense.......tied for 4th in block shots.
IMO...Willis is a very good role player.......Just me, but
I don't see that much drop off when he enters the game.
do you mind if I like this?Looking at all of the "horrible team and poor coaching" posts. The same posters are throwing "likes" at all of them.
I think I want to up my "like" count. I am going to continually criticize different aspects of coaching, playing time, players and even some blue hair stuff (willis joke...get it?)
The stats on Willis are he disappears when the talent around him is performing to ability. they aren't playing very well, and our competition hasn't been outstanding. Him just being being average right now isn't a good thing for him. If ever he wanted to take a spot, it would be now. He's not taking it, and he won't have long make it happen either.
Willis will be getting little minutes by mid January / early February if this team is what it needs to be by those times.
Unless of course his game rapidly improved.
nah, Cal takes it as a personal challenge to try and win with the least talent he has available, just like his idol CRP did with Anderson.Matt said this morning that what he's hearing is that Willis still has problems with putting forth the effort in practice. Amazes me how fans think any college coach, let alone one as successful as Cal is too stupid to play to the right players. Like they could possibly know something from just watching games that Cal can't see being with these kids every day.