ADVERTISEMENT

Sarr or Cunningham, if you had to pick only one

Sarr is not horrible. He misused all season and had horrible guard play so the defenses could collapse. Every day there is some new idiot with no clue wtf they are talking about.
He certainly not horrible offensively. Probably misused in that respect as you said. But he’s hard to play because he’s so soft. He’s going to be around the basket on the other end. I like him but my enduring memory of him will be those two guys from Ole Miss just pushing him around and doing whatever the hell they wanted.
 
You guys are overthinking this. Cade Cunningham is the best player in the country. He's a guy who can elevate an average team to the next level. You don't pass on Luka Doncic just to bring in a mediocre big like Bagley just because it's more of a need.

Would you guys really pass on getting an impact player like RJ Barrett or Jamal Murray just to fill out the roster with a Nate Sestina, or a Reid Travis? How bleh was Kerry Blackshear again last year? What's our history with graduate transfers compared with top 5 NBA Draft locks? Sarr is solid and fills a hole. I'd trade him for Cunningham in a heartbeat. Cunningham, Boston, and Clarke? That's the #1 team in the country. You roll with Jackson and worry about lineup combos/finding a fill in big after the fact.
The best response to this thread and one we should ALL keep in mind going forward. Cade would have taken this team to the final 4 at a minimum. Sarr was the biggest letdown of the season as far as I’m concerned. He played in the pansy ass ACC and it showed all year long. Too soft and absolutely zero stength to go along with bricks for hands. Smh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: It'saDoneDeal
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT