Ref crew
- Thread starter Cawood86
- Start date
I don't usually complain, but gosh these guys shouldn't be reffing at this level. Embarrassing for the SEC that this is what we have officiating games.
"Blame refs for everything" fans are by far the worst kind.
Grow the F up.
Ole Miss played a great game and we didn't.
Grow the F up.
Ole Miss played a great game and we didn't.
Who in this thread blamed them for everything?
We played awful and Ole Miss played out their ass.
Didn't make the refs any better.
People who just make up stuff are the worst.
We played awful and Ole Miss played out their ass.
Didn't make the refs any better.
People who just make up stuff are the worst.
This is the worst Ref crew I've seen in years.."Calls that weren't there at all called" "Calls of Andrew getting pushed into a Ole Miss player and him getting called for the foul". If they can't find any better than this crew lets play with refs.. Its not their fault they're stupid as hell..
Who the F do you think you are? They were terrible, on our court. We deserve better officials than that.
Missed a blatant basket interference.
Took 3 full timeouts to say a guy's foot was on the line when I saw it right off the bat.
Phantom foul on Ulis when he wasn't within 6 inches of the guy.
A double foul that made ZERO sense. If you say the screen was an offensive foul, then the 2nd foul on the defender never happened. The two fouls didn't occur at the same time. So the one that occurred first stands, the second has to be waived. That's just common sense. Only way a true double foul can occur is if the two different contacts literally occurred at the exact same time. Not an illegal screen, a few dribbles, then a hand check.
Ole Miss played outstanding but the above calls mentioned should NEVER occur with a competent collegiate crew.
Took 3 full timeouts to say a guy's foot was on the line when I saw it right off the bat.
Phantom foul on Ulis when he wasn't within 6 inches of the guy.
A double foul that made ZERO sense. If you say the screen was an offensive foul, then the 2nd foul on the defender never happened. The two fouls didn't occur at the same time. So the one that occurred first stands, the second has to be waived. That's just common sense. Only way a true double foul can occur is if the two different contacts literally occurred at the exact same time. Not an illegal screen, a few dribbles, then a hand check.
Ole Miss played outstanding but the above calls mentioned should NEVER occur with a competent collegiate crew.
Not to mention every time summers had the ball he had his arm out pushing off. I think he even added a couple Heisman poses also.
Rupp used to have the "juice" to BAN certain refs from ever doing another game in Lexington. Now the "juice" is with the TV Networks. If we had won by 30+, how many people (even UK fans) would watch the SEC Network's multiple REPLAYS of this game and please their sponsor's ads? And NOW how many people (especially haters and opposing fan bases) do you think will watch it? Poor refs = OT game (or even a LOSS) and that means ka-ching!!!
I missed your 4th example because I didn't see the whole game but agree 100% with the other three. I can at least understand the call against Ulis. He was close. But, the first two were completely inexcusable.
We had 1 of these refs for the Boston game((..Glenn Tuitt)).and none have a lot of experience..Id say this was the C crew.
The UofL game was much worse. I noticed that Johnson got slapped across the face early in the game w/ a no call.
All in all I wasn't to upset about the refs, they aren't perfect so we can't expect them to ref a perfect game. I certainly can't see what all the fuss is about. They didn't cause the game to be as close as it was. Had we played to even half our potential we could have blown them out w/ most of our players on the bench. We just played a bad game vs. a red hot shooting team.
All in all I wasn't to upset about the refs, they aren't perfect so we can't expect them to ref a perfect game. I certainly can't see what all the fuss is about. They didn't cause the game to be as close as it was. Had we played to even half our potential we could have blown them out w/ most of our players on the bench. We just played a bad game vs. a red hot shooting team.
two bad goaltending calls, two non fouls called on ulis that were in the act of shooting. another cheapie on booker and one on towns. i watched on tv granted but i saw about 6 bad calls against us. imo that's not bad. especially at home where we typically and ironically get the shaft. we got some good calls. i thought they did a pretty good job overall actually. it was physical and they let us play. i rather see that than cheap touch calls all game long. yes there were bad calls, but i thought there were some good calls that you normally don't see called correctly. the ones they missed were bad but they seemed on top of everything else. jmho
The refs weren't terrible, just not very good. Now Ole Miss, they were very, very good... well coached, thoughtful game plan, and executed it well. Hats off to 'em.
Yep. The double foul has to happen simultaneously. Otherwise, the first foul creates a dead ball, and a common foul like that doesn't happen during a dead ball period.
Saiz last foul looked like a clean block to me. Cats took twice as many foul attempts as Ole Miss can't see how anyone says they was screwing us over. Their overall foul calling just wasn't consistent, you could mug someone one minute for no calls then be called for a slight brush of a hand.
Similar threads
