ADVERTISEMENT

Reed assigned to G League

What happens if he blows out a knee bc his body wasn’t ready for the rigors of the nba? If he ends up being a bust his relationship with bbn is non existent. The nba route was a massive dice roll
LOL. It takes a twisted mind working some severely convoluted logic to think that taking a guaranteed $45 million contract is more of a “dice roll” than returning to college ball with no guarantees.
 
At least he can play. I don’t know why Houston drafted him if they didn’t need him. But for those saying he should’ve stayed, I mean, yeah as a fan it would’ve been awesome but a kid from North Laurel High School was going to be a top three pick in the NBA Draft.

Not a single one of us would’ve passed on that.
NOT... A... SINGLE.... ONE.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: B.B.H.
That’s true. But there’s a flip side to getting assigned to the G League: Nothing shortens your NBA career more than getting cooked in the G League. Every cat Sheppard faces in the G League will be aiming to rip him a new one. Time for Sheppard to become a man.
It is a business, sink or swim. #3 pick or not, Rockets will not give too long of a rope. They have too many young dudes trying to make their mark in the league. IF and it is rumors and all that, IF the Rockets get involved in the Fox sweepstakes when it becomes real, Houston is suppose to be at the front of the line of teams interested, and most importantly, able to acquire him.
 
I think the question is, what is the height of UK "lore/legacy" worth?


If we were to scale Kentucky basketball legacy, 1-10, with a 10 being Rupp/Riley/Unforgettables/Pitino/Issel/Givens etc and a 1 being someone/something like Ryan Harrow/Cameron Fletcher/NIT teams etc where would Reed rank?


I would have him max at around a 5, and only that high because of his being born and bred in the state, being the son of two former UK basketball players, and for having a great freshmen year individually. If he has a great NBA career, maybe a 6-7, but no higher because of no team success. I think a Maxey would be a player with a similar score based on their actual time at UK, a 5.


If Reed comes back and plays 3-4 years total at UK, then to the NBA, i think even without a title he's likely an 8-9. If he comes back and wins a title, even without any kind of NBA career he's a 10.


So the question becomes, what's that worth? To be a 10 in UK basketball lore/legacy vs a 5? I'm not sure. He has $20 million guaranteed right now, but not the significant Kentucky basketball legacy of say someone like his father. I would give his father a 10 based on being a two-time champion, and a Final Four MVP. But, what has that gotten him? Is that value greater than big money early in a so far undetermined NBA future?
You make an absolutely great point. Just suppose he comes back and stays all 4 years. With a good coach like Pope and an offense that's suited for Reed, he might have been one of the all-time greats and certainly one of if not most liked players ever here. I don't know what his NIL was but it certainly would have been significant. And even if it costed him his NBA career he would have money , jobs, endorsements and a life of royalty and comfort waiting for him here. He could be looking at a short NBA career now. Who knows, playing under Pope might have even helped lengthen his career.
 
You make an absolutely great point. Just suppose he comes back and stays all 4 years. With a good coach like Pope and an offense that's suited for Reed, he might have been one of the all-time greats and certainly one of if not most liked players ever here. I don't know what his NIL was but it certainly would have been significant. And even if it costed him his NBA career he would have money , jobs, endorsements and a life of royalty and comfort waiting for him here. He could be looking at a short NBA career now. Who knows, playing under Pope might have even helped lengthen his career.
Before we saw Pope’s product at Kentucky, we had no way to know exactly how well his offense would translate to the SEC. The Big 12 was a juggernaut last year but that conference is very different than the SEC, which features supreme athletes even on the worst teams. I felt very confident Pope’s system would work here but it wasn’t a guarantee. Why do you think we had trouble getting that first portal commit? It was fear of the unknown. Reed might have saw it is a risk, even if he wanted to come play for Pope. Top 3 NBA draft pick and even if he played out of his mind, he wouldn’t have been a top 3 pick in a stronger class. Also, I keep seeing people talk about the risk of injury, a valid concern. Equally concerning is another year of play offers scouts an opportunity to further scrutinize and pick holes in your game which could potentially lower your stock. Reed made a good choice
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
Got a ton of money but he was not ready for the league. His parents really should have known this! Another year of college playing under Pope (who Jeff played with) would have been helpful. Now he is playing in the G league and may well get recruited over
He was a Top 3 pick on a competitive team. And possesses the most coveted skill in the NBA game. His value has not diminished. He'll be just fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G-PIP and Zissou87
That’s right! #3 picks in the draft routinely get sent down to the CBA/G League.

I can tell you're really plugged into the pro game, because you referred to it as the CBA. Good organizations routinely send their prospects to the G-League affiliate if there are no minutes for them. Most lottery picks go to bad teams and get all the minutes they can handle. It's not the case with Reed.

I'm sure he's a lot happier living his dream since it's his life in the NBA as opposed to waiting for Amari Williams to give him backdoor passes.
 
Been around basketball long enough to have attended a few CBA games back in the day. I’m sure someone on this thread has already pointed out the litany of other #3 overall draft picks who went on to have successful NBA careers who were demoted to the G League during their first season. Off the top of my head I can’t remember any. Help me out?
I dunno ask Chat GPT to find you the same exact scenario that mirror Reed's. If not, then you can confirm his already doomed NBA career and feel good about yourself.
 
Anyone? Anyone ? How did all our guys do in the NBA tonight ?

What about Reed? Rob? KAT? AD? wHy ArE YoU ReAdiNG ThIS ThReAD? maKE IT MaKE IT MaKE SeNSe!
 
A 50 burger on his first night. Yeesh.

The talent is there but it was the same thing at UK, he just had to gain the confidence.
 
So, should they keep him there and let him play, or should they belting him back for scrub minutes off the bench? Which is most beneficial?
 
LOL. It takes a twisted mind working some severely convoluted logic to think that taking a guaranteed $45 million contract is more of a “dice roll” than returning to college ball with no guarantees.
Dice roll for the long term. Either way the money is there. Legend and legacy are not. It everyone measures success in money. In reeds case it was an awful decision to be an icon for the state making big money to go when he did. You clowns all think it’s about the money. When the money is there either way then it is no longer about the money. The $$$$$$$$$$ approach cal brought needs to be cleansed.
 
The Rockets are too good to let him develop on the floor and adjust to the speed of the game and the talent level. They have legit playoff aspirations and guard play does not lack. Van Fleet is broken down but he’s also their most experienced player and a heady, physical vet and Reed’s not going to take any of his minutes.

Rockets are ina really good place for the future.
 
Dice roll for the long term. Either way the money is there. Legend and legacy are not. It everyone measures success in money. In reeds case it was an awful decision to be an icon for the state making big money to go when he did. You clowns all think it’s about the money. When the money is there either way then it is no longer about the money. The $$$$$$$$$$ approach cal brought needs to be cleansed.
How the hell was the money there either way? He could have realistically fell out of the first round if he returned, in which case there is literally zero guaranteed money on his contract.

And you need to be honest about something. When you say "In reeds case it was an awful decision to be an icon for the state making big money to go when he did." you're really saying it was an awful decision for YOU because YOU wanted him to be an icon in the state playing for UK. If that's truly what HE wanted, he would have returned.
 
How the hell was the money there either way? He could have realistically fell out of the first round if he returned, in which case there is literally zero guaranteed money on his contract.

And you need to be honest about something. When you say "In reeds case it was an awful decision to be an icon for the state making big money to go when he did." you're really saying it was an awful decision for YOU because YOU wanted him to be an icon in the state playing for UK. If that's truly what HE wanted, he would have returned.
Some people are not realistic. They think they are going to get these 1st rounder’s to stay. Not likely, even if they are Ky boys.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zissou87
Dice roll for the long term. Either way the money is there. Legend and legacy are not. It everyone measures success in money. In reeds case it was an awful decision to be an icon for the state making big money to go when he did. You clowns all think it’s about the money. When the money is there either way then it is no longer about the money. The $$$$$$$$$$ approach cal brought needs to be cleansed.
If you want to recruit elite talent, that aspect has to be in consideration for guys. There’s no ELITE kid out there that thinks about bypassing a guaranteed $10,000,000 a year contract in the NBA for their legacy in college.

"The money" that you are talking about isn't guaranteed.
 
If you want to recruit elite talent, that aspect has to be in consideration for guys. There’s no ELITE kid out there that thinks about bypassing a guaranteed $10,000,000 a year contract in the NBA for their legacy in college.

"The money" that you are talking about isn't guaranteed.

If people want a team full of Perry’s and Noah’s because it scratches certain itches for them about what “Kentucky Basketball means” we won’t win that much tbh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jamal Sunburn
If you want to recruit elite talent, that aspect has to be in consideration for guys. There’s no ELITE kid out there that thinks about bypassing a guaranteed $10,000,000 a year contract in the NBA for their legacy in college.

"The money" that you are talking about isn't guaranteed.

They think 18 yr old kids dont want guaranteed money of being a NBA player with a lucrative contract, but want to be getting free meals at local restaurants and doing card signings when they're 53 yrs old for $5k at the Kentucky sportings good stores.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT