So all these reports about the BBN making possible death threats (which I find dubious, by the way) to J. Higgins have basically made us look like trash in the eyes of the sports following nation. Fine, whatever.
What I find interesting is a comment in the SI story on said referee Higgins from last year where it states, in the 3rd paragraph: "He has seen pictures of his kids posted online by angry fans."
Now that, if true, would be beyond despicable. Kids, even the children of convicted criminals, have the right to remain distanced and anonymous from their parents, I don't care what they've done. And I think almost everyone who heard that story would overwhelmingly agree with me on that. So where was THAT story when it happened? I mean we are in a national upheaval over some frustrated fans acting like idiots on a facebook page, how would that even compare to bringing a guys kids into stuff like this?
What I find interesting is a comment in the SI story on said referee Higgins from last year where it states, in the 3rd paragraph: "He has seen pictures of his kids posted online by angry fans."
Now that, if true, would be beyond despicable. Kids, even the children of convicted criminals, have the right to remain distanced and anonymous from their parents, I don't care what they've done. And I think almost everyone who heard that story would overwhelmingly agree with me on that. So where was THAT story when it happened? I mean we are in a national upheaval over some frustrated fans acting like idiots on a facebook page, how would that even compare to bringing a guys kids into stuff like this?