ADVERTISEMENT

Portal PG's comparison

JonathanW

All-American
Jan 3, 2003
28,211
15,047
113
Can't compare their defense statistically, and to me that may be the most important trait for that position.
But still:

Name (Yrs remain) school, Ht Wt, Pt, Reb, Ast, TO, Stl+Blk (Stocks), FG%, 3pt% 3pt/gm, FT%
Dent (1) NM, 6'2 185, 20.4, 2.3, 6.4, 3.1, 1.4+0.9 (2.3), 49.0%, 40.9% 0.9, 78.4%
Agbim (1) Wyoming, 6'3 180, 17.6, 3.2, 3.4, 2.2, 1.1+0.3 (1.4), 46.9%, 43.7% 2.8, 78.5% (listed as SG though, and committed to Baylor)
Peterson (1) ETSU, 6'1 190, 19.5, 4.5, 3.7, 2.2, 2.0+0.2 (2.2), 46.8%, 42.2% 2.7, 73.3%
Thomas (2) UNLV, 6'1 185, 15.6, 2.0, 4.7, 1.9, 0.7+0.1 (0.8), 41.3%, 35.3% 0.9, 72.1%

Not yet in portal, but could go in:
Thorton (1) Ohio St, 6'2 215, 17.7, 3.4, 4.6, 1.5, 1.1+0.1 (1.2), 50.1%, 42.4% 1.8, 85.3%
Smith (1) Purdue, 6'0 175, 16.0, 4.5, 8.5, 3.0, 2.2+0.2 (2.4), 43.0%, 38.5% 2.3, 83.0%
Fears (2) Mich. St, 6'2, 190, 7.4, 2.1, 5.4, 2.0, 1.1+0.2 (1.3), 40.6%, 36.1% 0.4, 74.3%
Odum (1) Pepperdine, 6'1 160, 13.1, 3.2, 7.5, 2.6, 1.2+0.0 (1.2), 45.2%, 37.9% 1.7, 79.3%
Smith (1) Dayton, 6'0 175, 10.4, 2.9, 5.3, 2.1, 1.0+0.0 (1.0), 42.4%, 38.3% 0.9, 71.7%

(Stirtz has already committed to follow his coach to Iowa)
 
Last edited:
I think Agbim has already committed (Baylor?). Also, I don't love the lower FG% with some of these guys.
 
Surprised that Duke isn’t being thrown in the around with Smith, since everyone seems to think he will be the top point guard once he’s in the portal
 
Can't compare their defense statistically, and to me that may be the most important trait for that position.
But still:

Name (Yrs remain) school, Ht Wt, Pt, Reb, Ast, TO, Stl+Blk (Stocks), FG%, 3pt% 3pt/gm, FT%
Dent (1) NM, 6'2 185, 20.4, 2.3, 6.4, 3.1, 1.4+0.9 (2.3), 49.0%, 40.9% 0.9, 78.4%
Agbim (1) Wyoming, 6'3 180, 17.6, 3.2, 3.4, 2.2, 1.1+0.3 (1.4), 46.9%, 43.7% 2.8, 78.5% (listed as SG though)
Peterson (1) ETSU, 6'1 190, 19.5, 4.5, 3.7, 2.2, 2.0+0.2 (2.2), 46.8%, 42.2% 2.7, 73.3%
Thomas (2) UNLV, 6'1 185, 15.6, 2.0, 4.7, 1.9, 0.7+0.1 (0.8), 41.3%, 35.3% 0.9, 72.1%

Not yet in portal, but could go in:
Thorton (1) Ohio St, 6'2 215, 17.7, 3.4, 4.6, 1.5, 1.1+0.1 (1.2), 50.1%, 42.4% 1.8, 85.3%
Smith (1) Purdue, 6'0 175, 16.0, 4.5, 8.5, 3.0, 2.2+0.2 (2.4), 43.0%, 38.5% 2.3, 83.0%
Fears (2) Mich. St, 6'2, 190, 7.4, 2.1, 5.4, 2.0, 1.1+0.2 (1.3), 40.6%, 36.1% 0.4, 74.3%
Odum (1) Pepperdine, 6'1 160, 13.1, 3.2, 7.5, 2.6, 1.2+0.0 (1.2), 45.2%, 37.9% 1.7, 79.3%
Smith (1) Dayton, 6'0 175, 10.4, 2.9, 5.3, 2.1, 1.0+0.0 (1.0), 42.4%, 38.3% 0.9, 71.7%

(Stirtz has already committed to follow his coach to Iowa)
Speed also to consider as Dent is said to be one of the very fastest players in the land with the ball in his hands.
 
I think Agbim has already committed (Baylor?). Also, I don't love the lower FG% with some of these guys.
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
 
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
Sure, I can agree with wanting a strong leader, etc. But I can't agree with low 40% FG% being nothing to worry about. That portends an underlying issue, which may be poor shot selection, inability to finish, etc. And while a player taking a high amount of his shots from 3pt. range will tend to pull down overall FG% some, I don't think that's a sufficient excuse. On the other hand, a professional coach/coaching staff actually seeing and analyzing a player can trump statistics. So, if Pope & the guys like a player that's good enough for me to put my concerns aside.
 
Majority of the shots they are taking are from three. Mid to low 40% for a pg fg isn't bad really.
As we've seen with Butler. You need a strong leader that can shoot when needed. I don't want my pg being the top scoring option
They have separate shooting %s for 2s and 3s. At least Sports Reference the site I use does. It shows the # of 2s taken and made, # of 3s taken and made, # of ft's taken and made. Also have a average taken and made per game for all 3. The site is analytics persons dream. Advance stats galore. Sportsreference.com. I just google players name stats, then find sports reference and go to reading. Stathead is really cool feature they have.
 
They have separate shooting %s for 2s and 3s. At least Sports Reference the site I use does. It shows the # of 2s taken and made, # of 3s taken and made, # of ft's taken and made. Also have a average taken and made per game for all 3. The site is analytics persons dream. Advance stats galore. Sportsreference.com. I just google players name stats, then find sports reference and go to reading. Stathead is really cool feature they have.
I'm aware they have separate categories to show how many 3's are taken but overall percentage is both 2 point fg and 3 point fg
 
Smith's NIL with Purdue is 1.9 million.......they can keep him

hoped UK would get involved with Dent, but I think his price tag is going to be high

They can definitely keep him. Hes mostly a hustle and guts player, which is fine, but he wont cut it vs the sec elite. Definitely not at that price.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: trueblujr2
Where did you see this at? I would pay that for Braden smith. Absolutely I would.
I don't get it in todays game in order to have those type of WINNING players we might have to spend a little bit of money to get those type of guys. I hate it just like the rest of the older generation but it is what it is now! Dude has been to the Championship game just like Butler and Purdue is still in it this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueSince92
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT