ADVERTISEMENT

Poll: Greatest Military Leader/Tactician of all time.

Who was the GOAT at doing more with less?

  • Alexander the Great

    Votes: 19 38.0%
  • Napoleon Bonaparte

    Votes: 6 12.0%
  • Julius Caesar

    Votes: 5 10.0%
  • Hannibal Barca

    Votes: 8 16.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 12 24.0%

  • Total voters
    50
One of my favorite historical anecdotes - Livy tells the story of a later in life meeting between Hannibal and Scipio Africanus in Ephesus. Both agree Alexander is the greatest general of all time, sort of, while throwing plenty of shade and begrudging respect at each other.


However neither were around for Caesar, who is the correct answer
 
In this poll it’s Hannibal. All military leaders aspire to the brilliance that was Cannae.

Frederick the Great. Napoleon masterful in the beginning but relied too much on sledgehammer tactics towards the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKMKG and chroix
I went with a Robert E Lee. He nearly beat a country with some pissed off rednecks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKMKG
Lot of dudes to pick from … Leonidas for example did a lot with little.
 
Not to go all pun/baseball/war stat nerd, but Napoleon had the greatest WAR rating in history. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatguy87
Who would win a game of RISK?


A solid case can be made for any of 'em.

However -- there's clearly but one indisputable answer as to what the greatest version of RISK is:


7fa44f60-cdf0-4026-9b11-0e30c169f8ac.jpeg



I'd like to watch Hannibal just try to march those elephants through my fortified Ocean of Storms, I'd show him what "Barca" really is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HymanKaplan
Stonewall Jackson was pretty good. So was James Longstreet. But the best ever was probably Napoleon.
 
Are we factoring in the fact that the winner gets to write the history books? Even if some of these guys got lucky as shit or got bailed out the accounts of the time would make them sound like brilliant tacticians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tskware
Are we factoring in the fact that the winner gets to write the history books? Even if some of these guys got lucky as shit or got bailed out the accounts of the time would make them sound like brilliant tacticians.
Unless you're the nazis. Then you get to write hundreds of books saying your cause wasn't that bad and all your failure was due to Hitler.
 
Georgy Zhukov


"Comrades who had participated in the Kursk battle have come to me with questions: Why has Marshal Zhukov distorted history in his memoirs, claiming credit for things he never did? He shouldn't be permitted to do that!"
Rovvososky

"Marshal Zhukov, having lost any sense of modesty and obsessed with personal ambition, considers that his services have been insufficiently appreciated. He, in conversations with subordinates, claims to have led all the major operations in the Great Patriotic War, even those in which he had not the slightest connection."-Stalin
 
  • Like
Reactions: AustinTXCat
The answer is Alexander and there is no debate to be had here.

Dude was even prophesied about in the Bible, as was the fact that the four generals replacing him would not combined be as strong as he was.

Napoleon - marched the Grande Armee into Russia where it promptly froze to death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKMKG and entropy13
From this list, Alexander the Great.

Reported the OP's post, though, due to its horrific lack of diversity. All caucasian.

Subutai is the real winner.
Subutai was a Mongol general and the primary military strategist of Genghis Khan and Ögedei Khan. He directed more than 20 campaigns, during which he conquered or overran more territory than any other commander in history as part of the expansion of the Mongol Empire, the largest contiguous empire in human history.

He often gained victory by means of sophisticated strategies and routinely coordinated movements of armies that operated hundreds of kilometers apart from each other. Subutai is well known for the geographical diversity and success of his expeditions, which took him from central Asia to the Russian steppe and into Europe.

If Ögedei Khan hadn't died when he did, Subutai probably conquers most or all of Europe.
 
Last edited:
It’s either a Mongol or a Chinese general.

Mongols created the largest land empire. Only thing that stopped them from pushing into Europe was the forest and that Europe didn’t really have anything
 
Georgy Zhukov
"Comrades who had participated in the Kursk battle have come to me with questions: Why has Marshal Zhukov distorted history in his memoirs, claiming credit for things he never did? He shouldn't be permitted to do that!"
Rovvososky

"Marshal Zhukov, having lost any sense of modesty and obsessed with personal ambition, considers that his services have been insufficiently appreciated. He, in conversations with subordinates, claims to have led all the major operations in the Great Patriotic War, even those in which he had not the slightest connection."-Stalin
Additionally, Zhukov enjoyed roughly 1/6 of US WW2 arms and material production 1942-45.
 
It’s either a Mongol or a Chinese general.

Mongols created the largest land empire. Only thing that stopped them from pushing into Europe was the forest and that Europe didn’t really have anything
I think what happened was they got to Germany, and as they observed the locals, one general commented these men are much larger than ours to which his second in command responded, Sir, those are the women.
 
I think it's funny people put Sherman in here. The guy was one of the worst tactical generals during the civil war on either side. And was a mentally ill drunk. His most famous campaign he went to war against women and children and old men. Truly a tactial genuis.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT