Todd Golden, the young up and coming coach at Florida said the same thing a couple weeks ago. No clue why you would try to build around freshmen this day and age.
That is where the game has goneDo you think this is wise? I get not putting most of your efforts into recruiting OAD high schoolers. It’s often a bad value play. But to not recruit high schoolers at all? Can you effectively build your base with just transfers? I have major doubts about that. First, to have any continuity – which the data says is key to chasing titles – you would have to get a lot of guys who have at least two years of eligibility left. These types don’t seem to be as prevalent, but maybe it’s just that we don’t hear them being touted as much.
I understand Pitino’s position that he can’t replace his best seniors with freshmen and expect to win at a high level in today’s game, but that doesn’t mean you can’t or shouldn’t build your base with your own players coming from high school.
We'll call it Junior CollegeWatch this create a scenario where college freshman start to go to lesser programs, basically as a form of "minor league" development before the Dukes and Kentucky's of the world pluck them from these mid majors, if they are so deserving.
Football is in the same boat.That is where the game has gone
I may be wrong, but I think the rulings were addressing the ambiguity of their rules, which included lots of exceptions.
Do you really think having Pitino on the bench would elevate our team or Pope to final four or championship status. Rick is a good coach but not a magician. I think he would be a huge distraction for Coach Pope and would set our program back. Can you imagine the fan's reactions every time we lost a game? Half of our fans would be screaming, "if Rick was in charge"' or confusion in a time out would be the blame. Let Rick retire at USJ and Coach Pope lead us to become great again. We are not there yet, but in time Pope can and will be the perfect fit for UK.Pitino should join the UK staff with Mark and lead Kentucky back to the rightful spot. Winning a title with coach Pope is better then finishing his career at St Johns and not winning anything. Sounds like a horrible idea but for the man to still be coaching might as well come home and win one with a former player.
Presumably they sit quietly allowing schools to do whatever they want for a few years, then pick a school they don't like and attempt to hammer them for the same stuff everyone else is doing.And that kind of hints at the mess
The NCAA didn't publish rules for NIL
They published guidelines THEN tried enforcing them like rules with UT, UF and others
One sticking point I remember was the NCAA saying that NIL money wasn't intended influence students deciding which school to commit to (??)
So they shouldn't be receiving official university letterhead/monetary offers -- rather, an impartial assessment of their NIL value should be extended without any initial direct link to the University ---
That was apparently part of their beef with UT which ended up in court -- then State AGs jumped in claiming anti-trust violations
I believe the NCAA went to the Supreme Court TWICE -- losing badly and unanimously both times AND was ordered to pay some restitution
So - there were never any actual RULES or policies
NCAA outlined guidelines for administering NIL payments then peed themselves in shock when schools actually started paying players
They're still trying to figure out how to deal with the situation they've created here
What does the NCAA infractions committee actually DO now?
but he actually recruitsTodd Golden, the young up and coming coach at Florida said the same thing a couple weeks ago. No clue why you would try to build around freshmen this day and age.
Agreed.Balance balance balance and more balance.
A little off topic.
But, imo, if a player is being paid NIL money they should be paying for their own education and not on scholarship.
True. First year Pope has to rebuild a roster from 0Agreed.
Get 1-2 elite HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year Portal players (guys with 2-3 years left).
Get 1-2 Senior Portal players (if that).
The rest of the roster should be guys coming back to the program.
Almonar is not backYou can build continuity and still lean heavily on the portal. Not counting our 3 freshmen, UK can potentially have Oweh, Garrison, and Almanor back next year. Add in our 3 freshmen and that’s 6 potential returners. Granted, players have the option of leaving and teams usually have a surprise departure.
I think Pitino is saying he cannot get freshmen that impact the game in year 1 and will probably transfer out. Better for those teams to focus on incoming transfers, but still bring in some younger transfers to build continuity.
UK and other programs CAN get freshmen who can make impact their freshman year based off skill and size, or others who simply fit your scheme. I’m guessing Pope will go after top tier recruits AND some lower recruits that fit his scheme. At same time, he’ll go after top portal players who fill needs and fit scheme.
I would skew this more toward the Portal players than you have it. I'd shoot for one elite HS and 1 multi-year HS and the rest proven portal players with 1 or more years of eligibility plus any returning players that performed up to expectations.Agreed.
Get 1-2 elite HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year Portal players (guys with 2-3 years left).
Get 1-2 Senior Portal players (if that).
The rest of the roster should be guys coming back to the program.
Something like this:True. First year Pope has to rebuild a roster from 0
Yes, we need to have the continuity of a system.
Hopefully Chandler, Perry, Noah and Oweh return and all four make progress next year. I think Johnson will be OAD and Lewis Moreno will play at least two years. Then we bring 5 more transfers, 3 are senior and 2 are multi year players
Let’s see how boy wonder plays against the SEC in the tournament if they allow us to be physical. My guess he pouts and wilts when he leaves the soft as Charmin ACC.If I was a HC of a major program I’d put my NIL money at least 80 to 90 % of it on guys who have played and played well in College over just about any HIgh Schooler minus 17 year old PUKe 🤮 BOY wonder
This is perfect roster building and this is how I hope Pope builds UK's roster!Agreed.
Get 1-2 elite HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year HS recruits.
Get 1-2 multi year Portal players (guys with 2-3 years left).
Get 1-2 Senior Portal players (if that).
The rest of the roster should be guys coming back to the program.
Like an ipso facto return to freshmen ineligibe days. I'd like to see itI also like that Coaches and Fans are starting to push back on the NIL/Transfer stuff, but in a different way. So if players can transfer at will, and the pool has over a thousand of players, then why as a coach would I bother with freshman?
It might be kind of knocking the freshman down a peg (imagine is all P5 coaches took this approach), but the coaches and the programs are going to do whats best for THEIR team.. nothing says Rick Pitino has to roll the dice on some 18-year old anymore. I say good. Glad to see the programs taking SOME power back.
Off Topic: Ipso Facto would be a cool name for a 7'2" big from Europe or Africa !!Like an ipso facto return to freshmen ineligibe days. I'd like to see it