ADVERTISEMENT

Onyenso

If you are missing the sarcasm in the useless +/- stat not sure what to tell you
Sarcasm at the half as well, game thread jester? [roll] [roll] [roll]

cWw5pYK.png
 
I was not big on UGO returning this game or really even being a part of this team. I will say he seemed much quicker getting up and down the floor this year than last and made some great defensive plays tonight. Thought he played outstanding tonight with it being his first live game action in almost a year. Showed a lot more potential tonight than I saw in him last year.
 
I was not big on UGO returning this game or really even being a part of this team. I will say he seemed much quicker getting up and down the floor this year than last and made some great defensive plays tonight. Thought he played outstanding tonight with it being his first live game action in almost a year. Showed a lot more potential tonight than I saw in him last year.
I agree
 
Gotta wonder whose call it was having Onyenso flown to Atlanta the morning of the game and still playing the kid after he was puking at the shoot around and literally played with the flu? He played that well no where NEAR 100%. Just really odd thing since they left him in Lexington from the get go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Only thing I know is his paperwork, and a lot of others (non-athletes included) got royally screwed up and was put in late...

But at this point, it's clearly the ncaa screwing the kid...

There has been a lot of chatter lately that the whole "late enrollment" thing may have not been real. Meaning Z really needed to be here must sooner than he was to enroll in Fall semester and be eligible on the court.

Wondering if it may be as simple as him being eligible for spring semester.

Either way, seems like he may be out starting 4 next year.
 
I was not big on UGO returning this game or really even being a part of this team. I will say he seemed much quicker getting up and down the floor this year than last and made some great defensive plays tonight. Thought he played outstanding tonight with it being his first live game action in almost a year. Showed a lot more potential tonight than I saw in him last year.
He is the youngest of our three 7-footers.
 
Just having him or Bradshaw in the game makes peoples hesitate about driving the basketball. The negativity of some people on this board has went from laughable to strange to borderline psychotic. Good to have him back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Gotta wonder whose call it was having Onyenso flown to Atlanta the morning of the game and still playing the kid after he was puking at the shoot around and literally played with the flu? He played that well no where NEAR 100%. Just really odd thing since they left him in Lexington from the get go.
Good thing he played, I hope he said I’m ready to ball out coach, I’m flying down.
 
There has been a lot of chatter lately that the whole "late enrollment" thing may have not been real. Meaning Z really needed to be here must sooner than he was to enroll in Fall semester and be eligible on the court.

Wondering if it may be as simple as him being eligible for spring semester.

Either way, seems like he may be out starting 4 next year.
Could be that. He seems too content as if he already knows his fate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
The refs robbed him on a 4th block.

Like others mentioned, he blocked three shots, and altered 2 or 3 more. He did all of that in 9 or 10 minutes of play.

And this, coming in the 2nd biggest game of the year after he's been our for almost a year with an injury?

You take that any day. He's exactly what this team needs, and his presence will be huge for us as the season goes along.
 
-13 with Ugo in the game. He was not good tonight
I wish we'd quit using this totally meaningless stat. This is a team sport - you can't put the results of part of the game on 1 person. Hell he could be the only one to score any points while he was in. Have you ever seen this stat used in football for let's say a TE? Same worthless stat in any team sport.
 
+- is a terrible judge of how a player played IMO. Sometimes it shows the real picture but a lot of times it doesn’t.
Exactly!! It’s one of the dumbest analytics of the dumb analytics.

If a guy is just standing out there with 4 guys balling out his +- is good even though he may have never touched the ball or guarded anyone.

Conversely a guy can be dominating his position with 4 guys that can’t play and his +- is bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
Exactly!! It’s one of the dumbest analytics of the dumb analytics.

If a guy is just standing out there with 4 guys balling out his +- is good even though he may have never touched the ball or guarded anyone.

Conversely a guy can be dominating his position with 4 guys that can’t play and his +- is bad.
Not good as a snap-shot, but can be useful over time to see definite trends ...
 
+/- is just another tool in the toolbox to be used mostly to support someone's own agenda when it works for them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT