Think some things that get coded as effort, offensive rebounding and forcing turnovers, are areas we won’t be strong in this season.
In the case of the Clemson game, they had a higher offensive rebound rate and took better care of the ball. It’s why they edged us out despite similar shooting.
I think we have to get better at offensive rebounding, but it doesn’t come natural to this group. It should improve as we become better at running our offense.
On that note, part of the effort I saw missing was failure to run through the bumps. We allowed them to take us out of our offense.
For this team to click on all cylinders, they have to make teams pay for being overly aggressive. I think they know that. But it’s like Tyson says, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.”
We will have lots of chances to improve. SEC will be a war.
I’m as analytics heavy as anyone, but there are layers to this. One layer is, “ we went 7-27. Hit 9-27 and we win.”
Another layer is, “why 7-27?” Did we get all the shots we wanted and just get unlucky, or were there other underlying issues that put us in position to underperform? That is tougher to quantify, but it doesn’t mean it isn’t important.
For the record, I don’t think effort was the only reason we lost. I’m well aware that had we knocked down a couple more shots we win.
But knock down 2 more shots and we might only mask some other issues. Like being around a 1 assist/turnover when we’re usually closer to 2.
Total focused effort is the first domino, imo. It’s also the “easiest” to control. Again, imo, when the effort level is right, it makes a few other things go right as well.
If we do everything perfectly last night, we win by 20. I’m well aware we won’t do everything perfectly most nights. But I think we were 2-3 effort plays away from a win. In the scheme of things, I think it’s healthier to win that way than to knock down a couple extra bad shots.